Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities

Subsidiaries of multinational firms play an important role in the globalization of innovation, yet we have an incomplete idea of the influences on their innovative activity. Drawing on prior research in international business and strategy, we identify two sets of factors that influence the absorption and utilization of knowledge in multinational corporation subsidiaries: (a) the range of external and internal knowledge sources available; and (b) the subsidiary capabilities associated with knowledge absorption and utilization. We find that knowledge absorbed from the host country is useful to subsidiary innovation. We also find support for the role of subsidiary capabilities: both sourcing capability and combinative capability have a significant influence on the scale and quality of innovation.

[1]  BoschFrans A. J. Van Den,et al.  Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment , 1999 .

[2]  Örjan Sölvell,et al.  Cross-Border Innovation in the Multinational Corporation , 2000 .

[3]  A. Saxenian.  The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy , 1994 .

[4]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[5]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  BUILDING FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: THE ROLE OF SUBSIDIARY INITIATIVE , 1998 .

[6]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[7]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[8]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[9]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Technology sourcing and output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change , 2003 .

[10]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[11]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[12]  J. Birkinshaw.  How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost , 1996 .

[13]  Harbir Singh,et al.  The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode , 1988 .

[14]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[15]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[16]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[17]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations , 2004 .

[18]  R. Parente,et al.  Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation , 2007 .

[19]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[20]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Prospects for Developing Absorptive Capacity Through Internal Information Provision , 2004 .

[21]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[22]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States , 1991 .

[23]  Stephen Tallman.  Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[24]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[25]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[26]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[27]  A. Rugman,et al.  Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises , 2001 .

[28]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[29]  J. Dunning.  Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity , 1994 .

[30]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag? , 1986 .

[31]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[32]  Dennis C. Mueller.  Patents, Research and Development, and the Measurement of Inventive Activity , 1966 .

[33]  D. Westney,et al.  The Role of Japan-Based R&D in Global Technology Strategy : Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 1985 .

[34]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[35]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[36]  R. Gulati,et al.  STRATEGIC NETWORKS , 2000 .

[37]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[38]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[39]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters , 2000 .

[40]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[41]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[42]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[44]  Tony S. Frost,et al.  R&D co-practice and ‘reverse’ knowledge integration in multinational firms , 2005 .

[45]  W. Kuemmerle.  The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[46]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[47]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[48]  J. Jarillo,et al.  Coordination Demands of International Strategies , 1991 .

[49]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D , 1996 .

[50]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[51]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment and the Sourcing of Technological Advantage: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry , 1997 .

[52]  Jennifer W. Spencer,et al.  How Relevant is University-Based Scientific Research to Private High-Technology Firms? A United States–Japan Comparison , 2001 .

[53]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[54]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[55]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[56]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[57]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[58]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[59]  Stephen E. Thomsen,et al.  Scale and scope: the dynamics of industrial capitalism , 1992 .

[60]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Patents and R&D: is There a Lag? , 1984 .

[61]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[62]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[63]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .

[64]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[65]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[66]  Ho Gyun Kim.  On the Evolutionary Theory of the Firm , 2009 .

[67]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[68]  Anupama Phene,et al.  How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries , 2003 .

[69]  Björn Ambos,et al.  CAPABILITIES, CULTURAL DISTANCE AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF KNOWELDGE FLOWS WITHIN THE MNC. , 2005 .

[70]  Ian Cockburn,et al.  Racing or spilling? : the determinants of research productivity in ethical drug discovery , 1996 .

[71]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[72]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[73]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[74]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[75]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[76]  S. Feinberg.  Do World Product Mandates Really Matter? , 2000 .

[77]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs , 2004 .

[78]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[79]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[80]  David F. Midgley,et al.  Dual paths to performance: the impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance , 2005 .

[81]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[82]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation , 1997 .

[83]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[84]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[85]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .