Implications and Late Outcomes of Type II Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

[1]  S. Scali,et al.  Management of Endoleaks After Elective Infrarenal Aortic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Review. , 2023, JAMA surgery.

[2]  S. Scali,et al.  Incidence, Re-intervention and Survival Associated with Type II Endoleak at Hospital Discharge after Elective EVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative. , 2023, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  P. Goodney,et al.  High Incidence of Type 2 Endoleak and Low Associated Adverse Events in the Vascular Quality Initiative Linked to Medicare Claims. , 2022, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  H. Yasunaga,et al.  Nationwide Analysis of Persistent Type II Endoleak and Late Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Japan: A Propensity-Matched Analysis , 2022, Circulation.

[5]  G. Oderich,et al.  Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Koelemay,et al.  Type 2 Endoleak With or Without Intervention and Survival After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. , 2021, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  G. Long,et al.  Type II endoleak with an enlarging aortic sac after endovascular aneurysm repair predisposes to the development of a type IA endoleak. , 2020, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  J. Teijink,et al.  Incidence, natural course, and outcome of type II endoleaks in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair based on the ENGAGE registry data. , 2020, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  Paul A. Harris,et al.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  Michael J. Singh,et al.  Occult type I or III endoleaks are a common cause of failure of type II endoleak treatment after endovascular aortic repair , 2019, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  M. Schermerhorn,et al.  Trends of 30‐day mortality and morbidities in endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm during the last decade , 2019, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  P. Kolh,et al.  Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. , 2019, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  M. Sweeting,et al.  Editor's Choice – Re-interventions After Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Report From the IMPROVE Randomised Trial , 2018, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[14]  M. Fillinger,et al.  Risk factors and consequences of persistent type II endoleaks. , 2016, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  J. Matsumura,et al.  Predictors and outcomes of endoleaks in the Veterans Affairs Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. , 2015, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  P. Stather,et al.  Type II endoleak: conservative management is a safe strategy. , 2014, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[17]  Anahita Dua,et al.  Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  F. Verzini,et al.  Type II endoleak is an enigmatic and unpredictable marker of worse outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair. , 2014, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  F. Roudot-thoraval,et al.  Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[21]  G. LaMuraglia,et al.  Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  Carl van Walraven,et al.  Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  P. Harris,et al.  Is a type II endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[24]  C. Zarins,et al.  Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  Ashraf Mansour Habib Mansour,et al.  The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2018, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  M. Schermerhorn,et al.  Aneurysm sac expansion is independently associated with late mortality in patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair , 2018, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  P. Lin,et al.  Lower Extremity Bypass Using Bovine Carotid Artery Graft (Artegraft): An Analysis of 124 Cases with Long-Term Results , 2017, World Journal of Surgery.

[28]  J. Alsac,et al.  Reinterventions for type 2 endoleaks with enlargement of the aneurismal sac after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2014, Annals of vascular surgery.

[29]  P. Lin,et al.  Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted? , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.