The Trajectory Touchpoint Technique: A Deep Dive Methodology for Service Innovation

This article introduces the trajectory touchpoint technique (TTT), a service design methodology that harnesses customer experiences for enriched understanding of value throughout multilevel service components to ultimately increase innovativeness. We detail the design and development of the TTT using design science research, a goal-oriented methodology that produces robust and practical solutions to organizational problems. We demonstrate the TTT’s practical utility through collaborations with different organizations (n = 9) and diverse service users (n = 240). We show how the TTT is an easy to use methodology that enhances understanding of value creation and illustrate its benefits with concrete examples of innovations to service encounters, the service system, and the value constellation. We reveal how a service design methodology can be the bridge between the theoretical standpoint of S-D logic’s perspective on value cocreation and the practical tools and techniques required to operationalize it.

[1]  A. Payne,et al.  Managing the co-creation of value , 2008 .

[2]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[3]  Simon Clatworthy,et al.  Service Innovation Through Touchpoints : Development of an Innovation Toolkit for the First Stages of New Service Development , 2011 .

[4]  P John Clarkson,et al.  History of Inclusive Design in the UK. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Design Science at the Intersection of Physical and Virtual Design , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Dirk Snelders,et al.  The Object of Service Design , 2011, Design Issues.

[7]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation , 2008 .

[8]  Brady T. West,et al.  Explaining Interviewer Effects: A Research Synthesis , 2016 .

[9]  K. Stowman World health statistics. , 1949, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[10]  Suresh C. Sood,et al.  When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing , 2008 .

[11]  Lia Patrício,et al.  Service Design for Value Networks: Enabling Value Cocreation Interactions in Healthcare , 2018 .

[12]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[13]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Population targeted requirements acquisition , 2018, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[16]  Lars Witell,et al.  Service Innovation and Customer Co-development , 2010 .

[17]  Daniel Pacheco Lacerda,et al.  Design Science Research: A Method for Science and Technology Advancement , 2014 .

[18]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Catharina von Koskull,et al.  Exploring value propositions and service innovation: a service-dominant logic study , 2015 .

[20]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Design for Value Co-Creation: Exploring Synergies Between Design for Service and Service Logic , 2014 .

[21]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  A research manifesto for services science , 2006, CACM.

[22]  Lucy Kimbell,et al.  Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I , 2011 .

[23]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[24]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[25]  Paul T. Skaggs,et al.  Rethinking Design Thinking , 2016 .

[26]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic 2025 , 2017 .

[27]  Leonel Nóbrega,et al.  The MINDS Method , 2017 .

[28]  Katarina Wetter-Edman,et al.  Staging aesthetic disruption through design methods for service innovation , 2017 .

[29]  Steven W. Rayburn,et al.  Transformative service research and service design: synergistic effects in healthcare , 2018 .

[30]  Lia Patrício,et al.  Designing Multi-Interface Service Experiences , 2008 .

[31]  K. Gwinner,et al.  Why don’t some people complain? A cognitive-emotive process model of consumer complaint behavior , 1998 .

[32]  Suvi Nenonen,et al.  Managing Co‐Creation Design: A Strategic Approach to Innovation , 2015 .

[33]  L. G. Zomerdijk,et al.  Service Design for Experience-Centric Services , 2010 .

[34]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Bringing Design Science Research to Service Design , 2018, IESS.

[35]  Richard Churchman,et al.  Revisiting Perceptions of Quality of Hospice Care , 2014, The American journal of hospice & palliative care.

[36]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Using a national archive of patient experience narratives to promote local patient-centered quality improvement: an ethnographic process evaluation of ‘accelerated’ experience-based co-design , 2014, Journal of health services research & policy.

[37]  A. Parant [World population prospects]. , 1990, Futuribles.

[38]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[40]  Katherine N. Lemon,et al.  Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey , 2016 .

[41]  S. Alinsky,et al.  Rules for Radicals , 2015 .

[42]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[43]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[44]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research , 2018, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Katarina Wetter-Edman,et al.  Designing for Aesthetic Disruption: Altering Mental Models in Social Systems through Designerly Practices , 2017 .

[46]  Dimitris Michailakis,et al.  The Systems Theory Concept of Disability: One is not born a disabled person, one is observed to be one , 2003 .

[47]  Lisa A. Giovanni End-of-life care in United States: current reality and future promise--a policy review. , 2012, Nursing economic$.

[48]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Design for Services , 2011 .

[49]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-Dominant Logic as a Foundation for Service Science: Clarifications , 2009 .

[50]  L. Ngo,et al.  Innovation and business success: The mediating role of customer participation , 2013 .

[51]  Aken van Je Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences : the quest for tested and grounded technological rules , 2001 .

[52]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[53]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange , 2011 .

[54]  Robert Winter,et al.  Towards an Innovative Service Development Process in the Electricity Industry , 2013, DESRIST.

[55]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Explanatory Design Theory , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[56]  S. Dy,et al.  Methodological Research Priorities in Palliative Care and Hospice Quality Measurement. , 2016, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[57]  M. Rosenbaum,et al.  How to create a realistic customer journey map , 2017 .

[58]  G. L. Shostack,et al.  How to Design a Service , 1982 .

[59]  Winifred Shaffer ANATOMY OF DESIGN , 1927 .

[60]  Paul Bate,et al.  Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement , 2012 .

[61]  R. Fisk,et al.  Upframing Service Design and Innovation for Research Impact , 2018 .

[62]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[63]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Making Sense by Making Sentient : Effectance Motivation Increases , 2010 .

[64]  Martin Culliney,et al.  The Oldest Old and the Risk of Social Exclusion , 2016, Social Policy and Society.

[65]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Participative, co-operative, emancipatory : From participatory design to service design , 2012 .

[66]  Leonel Nóbrega,et al.  Designing Services with Model-based Methods , 2012 .

[67]  Stan Maklan,et al.  Customer service experiences , 2013 .

[68]  Robert J. Glushko Describing service systems , 2013 .

[69]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[70]  C. Storey ABSORBING CUSTOMER KNOWLEDGE: HOW CUSTOMER INVOLVEMENT ENABLES SERVICE DESIGN SUCCESS , 2017 .

[71]  Tuure Tuunanen,et al.  Design Science Research Evaluation , 2012, DESRIST.

[72]  L. Moja,et al.  Exploring the practice of patient centered care: The role of ethnography and reflexivity. , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[73]  W. Helton,et al.  Using Experience-Based Design to Improve the Care Experience for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. , 2016, Journal of oncology practice.

[74]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis , 2016 .

[75]  R. Fisk,et al.  Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting , 2011 .

[76]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Fundamentals of service science , 2008 .

[77]  Stefan Holmlid,et al.  Resource Integration as a Perspective on Value in Interaction Design , 2018 .