A novel mobile monitoring approach to characterize spatial and temporal variation in traffic-related air pollutants in an urban community

Air concentrations of traffic-related air pollutants (TRAPs) vary in space and time within urban communities, presenting challenges for estimating human exposure and potential health effects. Conventional stationary monitoring stations/networks cannot effectively capture spatial characteristics. Alternatively, mobile monitoring approaches became popular to measure TRAPs along roadways or roadsides. However, these linear mobile monitoring approaches cannot thoroughly distinguish spatial variability from temporal variations in monitored TRAP concentrations. In this study, we used a novel mobile monitoring approach to simultaneously characterize spatial/temporal variations in roadside concentrations of TRAPs in urban settings. We evaluated the effectiveness of this mobile monitoring approach by performing concurrent measurements along two parallel paths perpendicular to a major roadway and/or along heavily trafficked roads at very narrow scale (one block away each other) within short time period (<30 min) in an urban community. Based on traffic and particulate matter (PM) source information, we selected 4 neighborhoods to study. The sampling activities utilized real-time monitors, including battery-operated PM2.5 monitor (SidePak), condensation particle counter (CPC 3007), black carbon (BC) monitor (Micro-Aethalometer), carbon monoxide (CO) monitor (Langan T15), and portable temperature/humidity data logger (HOBO U12), and a GPS-based tracker (Trackstick). Sampling was conducted for ∼3 h in the morning (7:30–10:30) in 7 separate days in March/April and 6 days in May/June 2012. Two simultaneous samplings were made at 5 spatially-distributed locations on parallel roads, usually distant one block each other, in each neighborhood. The 5-min averaged BC concentrations (AVG ± SD, [range]) were 2.53 ± 2.47 [0.09–16.3] μg/m3, particle number concentrations (PNC) were 33,330 ± 23,451 [2512–159,130] particles/cm3, PM2.5 mass concentrations were 8.87 ± 7.65 [0.27–46.5] μg/m3, and CO concentrations were 1.22 ± 0.60 [0.22–6.29] ppm in the community. The traffic-related air pollutants, BC and PNC, but not PM2.5 or CO, varied spatially depending on proximity to local stationary/mobile sources. Seasonal differences were observed for all four TRAPs, significantly higher in colder months than in warmer months. The coefficients of variation (CVs) in concurrent measurements from two parallel routes were calculated around 0.21 ± 0.17, and variations were attributed by meteorological variation (25%), temporal variability (19%), concentration level (6%), and spatial variability (2%), respectively. Overall study findings suggest this mobile monitoring approach could effectively capture and distinguish spatial/temporal characteristics in TRAP concentrations for communities impacted by heavy motor vehicle traffic and mixed urban air pollution sources.

[1]  J. Froines,et al.  Intra-community spatial variability of particulate matter size distributions in Southern California/Los Angeles , 2008 .

[2]  J. Kadane,et al.  Understanding intra-neighborhood patterns in PM2.5 and PM10 using mobile monitoring in Braddock, PA , 2012, Environmental Health.

[3]  Michael G Yost,et al.  Multi-pollutant mobile platform measurements of air pollutants adjacent to a major roadway. , 2014, Atmospheric environment.

[4]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Using mobile monitoring to characterize roadway and aircraft contributions to ultrafine particle concentrations near a mid-sized airport , 2014 .

[5]  Erik Lebret,et al.  Small area variations in ambient NO2 concentrations in four European areas , 2000 .

[6]  P. Elliott,et al.  A regression-based method for mapping traffic-related air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Particulate matter exposure along designated bicycle routes in Vancouver, British Columbia. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Kiros Berhane,et al.  Childhood Incident Asthma and Traffic-Related Air Pollution at Home and School , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  D. Niemeier,et al.  Near-roadway air quality: synthesizing the findings from real-world data. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Air pollution from traffic in city districts near major motorways. , 1998 .

[11]  A. Peters,et al.  Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio- respiratory mortality: a review , 2013, Environmental Health.

[12]  Steve L Mara,et al.  A Wide Area of Air Pollutant Impact Downwind of a Freeway during Pre-Sunrise Hours. , 2009, Atmospheric environment.

[13]  Griša Močnik,et al.  Impact of traffic volume and composition on the air quality and pedestrian exposure in urban street canyon , 2014 .

[14]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Land use regression modeling of intra-urban residential variability in multiple traffic-related air pollutants , 2008, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[15]  M. Brauer,et al.  Changes in Residential Proximity to Road Traffic and the Risk of Death From Coronary Heart Disease , 2010, Epidemiology.

[16]  Yungang Wang,et al.  Long-term study of urban ultrafine particles and other pollutants , 2011 .

[17]  Jay R. Turner,et al.  Post-processing Method to Reduce Noise while Preserving High Time Resolution in Aethalometer Real-time Black Carbon Data , 2011 .

[18]  M. Hallquist,et al.  Urban aerosol evolution and particle formation during wintertime temperature inversions , 2009 .

[19]  A. Frey,et al.  Mobile Particle and NO_x Emission Characterization at Helsinki Downtown: Comparison of Different Traffic Flow Areas , 2014 .

[20]  Altaf Arain,et al.  A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[21]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Factors influencing the spatial extent of mobile source air pollution impacts: a meta-analysis , 2007, BMC public health.

[22]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Comparison of daytime and nighttime concentration profiles and size distributions of ultrafine particles near a major highway. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Characterizing local traffic contributions to particulate air pollution in street canyons using mobile monitoring techniques , 2011 .

[24]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Exposure assessment of a cyclist to PM10 and ultrafine particles. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  Beizhan Yan,et al.  Optimization Approaches to Ameliorate Humidity and Vibration Related Issues Using the MicroAeth Black Carbon Monitor for Personal Exposure Measurement , 2013, Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research.

[26]  Julio Lumbreras,et al.  Study of PM10 and PM2.5 levels in three European cities: Analysis of intra and inter urban variations , 2014 .

[27]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Spatial variability of fine particle concentrations in three European areas , 2002 .

[28]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Nanoparticle emissions on Minnesota highways , 2004 .

[29]  John D. Spengler,et al.  Modeling Spatial Patterns of Traffic-Related Air Pollutants in Complex Urban Terrain , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Pedestrian exposure to air pollution along a major road in Central London, UK , 2005 .

[31]  J. Kaufman.  Toward a more disproportionate epidemiology. , 2010, Epidemiology.

[32]  Gayle S.W. Hagler,et al.  High-Resolution Mobile Monitoring of Carbon Monoxide and Ultrafine Particle Concentrations in a Near-Road Environment , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[33]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near a Major Highway , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[34]  Doug Brugge,et al.  Mobile monitoring of particle number concentration and other traffic-related air pollutants in a near-highway neighborhood over the course of a year. , 2012, Atmospheric environment.

[35]  Simon Kingham,et al.  Using mobile monitoring to visualise diurnal variation of traffic pollutants across two near-highway neighbourhoods , 2014 .

[36]  J. Levy,et al.  Spatial and temporal differences in traffic-related air pollution in three urban neighborhoods near an interstate highway. , 2014, Atmospheric environment.

[37]  L. Naeher,et al.  A review of traffic-related air pollution exposure assessment studies in the developing world. , 2006, Environment international.

[38]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  SAS for Linear Models , 2002 .

[39]  Patrick Berghmans,et al.  Monitoring PM10 and Ultrafine Particles in Urban Environments Using Mobile Measurements , 2013 .