Ecotourism land capability evaluation using spatial multi criteria evaluation.

Study ahead, aims at examination of applicability of multi criteria evaluation in land suitability analysis. In recent years, multiple criteria decision making models have been entered in the field of ecological land evaluation studies significantly. Among the important features of multiple criteria decision-making system can be named its involving with various factors weight, or quantifying experts' opinions in decision-making models. In this study, a region with an extent of 7181 ha was selected in Dohezar Basin (located on northern part of Iran) in which the land capability was evaluated for tourism land use using multi criteria evaluation. All criteria were weighed using experts' opinion and relevant standards and ultimately areas were selected as suitable places for tourism which have the highest suitability. Compared with the traditional model in which some important factors is ignored due to its limited ability in simultaneous consideration of all effective criteria as well as poor integration and weighting, can be easily inferred that such a model can not be held accountable in watershed decision-making levels, especially in small and complex physiographic conditions. In multiple criteria evaluation methods, all the indicators after forming the decision matrix and weighting process, were integrated and classified based on the rating received for tourism potentiality, and the suitability map for the tourism land use was prepared. The results of this approach, while consistent with the existing conditions, also has made possible the appropriate decision making to allocate the land to different land uses.

[1]  Mir Masoud Kheirkhah Zarkesh,et al.  Application of spatial analytical hierarchy process model in land use planning. , 2010 .

[2]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach to GIS-Based Land Suitability Evaluation , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Y. Murayama,et al.  Land evaluation for peri-urban agriculture using analytical hierarchical process and geographic information system techniques: A case study of Hanoi , 2008 .

[4]  A. Hu,et al.  Green supply chain management in the electronic industry , 2008 .

[5]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning , 2003 .

[6]  T. Saaty An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” , 1990 .

[7]  P. Kuyler Application of multi-criteria analysis in land use decisions , 2006 .

[8]  M. K. Zarkesh,et al.  Decision Support System for Floodwater Spreading Site Selection in Iran , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[10]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[11]  T. Saaty Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[12]  M. Nyeko GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Land Use Resource Planning , 2012 .

[13]  Land use potential and suitability for areas of arable and garden farming, meadow-pasture and recreation-tourism in Alpağut Village, Bolu, Turkey. , 2006 .

[14]  Narges Zaredar,et al.  Examination of compensatory model application in site selection , 2011, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[15]  Seyed Ali Jozi,et al.  Investigation of fuzzy as well as Boolean logics application in land evaluation (Case study: Taleghan basin-Iran) , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Chemistry and Chemical Engineering.

[16]  E. Karami,et al.  A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP , 2008 .

[17]  T N Prakash,et al.  Land Suitability Analysis for Agricultural Crops: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Approach , 2003 .