Modeling the integration of motion signals across space.

Experiments by Loffler and Orbach on the integration of motion signals across space [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 1461 (2003)] revealed that both three-dimensional analysis and object interpretation play a much smaller role than previously assumed. These results motivated the quantitative description of a low-level, bottom-up model presented here. Motion is computed in parallel at different spatial sites, and excitatory interactions operate between sites. The strength of these interactions is determined mainly by distance. Simulations correctly predict behavior for a variety of manipulations on multi-aperture stimuli: aligned and skewed lines, different presentation times, different inter-aperture gaps, and different spatial frequencies. However, strictly distance-dependent mechanisms are too simplistic to account for all experimental data. Mismatches for grossly misoriented lines suggest collinear facilitation as a promising extension. Once incorporated, collinear facilitation not only correctly predicts results for misoriented patterns but also accounts for the lack of motion integration between heterogeneous stimuli such as lines and dots.

[1]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area , 1992, Nature.

[2]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  The role of terminators and occlusion cues in motion integration and segmentation: a neural network model , 1999, Vision Research.

[4]  D. Field,et al.  Integration of contours: new insights , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Relationship between intrinsic connections and functional architecture revealed by optical imaging and in vivo targeted biocytin injections in primate striate cortex. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J Lorenceau,et al.  Cooperative and competitive spatial interactions in motion integration , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Cowan,et al.  A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue , 1973, Kybernetik.

[8]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[9]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[10]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  Jeounghoon Kim,et al.  Direction repulsion between components in motion transparency , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The aperture problem—I. Perception of nonrigidity and motion direction in translating sinusoidal lines , 1988, Vision Research.

[14]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  Isolating the effect of one-dimensional motion signals on the perceived direction of moving two-dimensional objects , 1993, Vision Research.

[15]  H. Wilson A model for direction selectivity in threshold motion perception , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  S. Dakin,et al.  Snakes and ladders: the role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  Maggie Shiffrar,et al.  The influence of terminators on motion integration across space , 1992, Vision Research.

[18]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  James T. Todd,et al.  The perception of globally coherent motion , 1992, Vision Research.

[20]  Mercedes Barchilon Ben-Av,et al.  Disambiguating velocity estimates across image space , 1995, Vision Research.

[21]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[22]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Dynamics of contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.

[23]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Hysteresis in binocular grating perception: Contrast effects , 1977, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Wuerger,et al.  Perception of Moving Lines: Interactions Between Local Perpendicular Signals and 2D Motion Signals , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  Gunter Loffler The integration of motion signals across space. , 1999 .

[26]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  W Singer,et al.  The Perceptual Grouping Criterion of Colinearity is Reflected by Anisotropies of Connections in the Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[30]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of motion perception: Direction fields, apertures, and resonant grouping , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of motion grouping: from aperture ambiguity to object speed and direction , 1997 .

[32]  Hans Wallach Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[33]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[34]  H. Wilson,et al.  Motion Integration over Space: Interaction of the Center and Surround Motion* * This research was first reported at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, May 1994 and 1995. , 1997, Vision Research.

[35]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[36]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[37]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[39]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[40]  B Moulden,et al.  A Simultaneous Shift in Apparent Direction: Further Evidence for a “Distribution-Shift” Model of Direction Coding , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  Jeounghoon Kim,et al.  Perceived motion in the vector sum direction , 1994, Vision Research.

[43]  G. Orban,et al.  Shape and Spatial Distribution of Receptive Fields and Antagonistic Motion Surrounds in the Middle Temporal Area (V5) of the Macaque , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[44]  R. Gregory Stars to Eyes by Adaptive Optics , 2002, Perception.

[45]  F. Kooi Local direction of edge motion causes and abolishes the barberpole illusion , 1993, Vision Research.

[46]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[47]  H R Wilson,et al.  Curvature and separation discrimination at texture boundaries. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[48]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[49]  Ennio Mingolla,et al.  Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon , 1998, Vision Research.

[50]  J. B. Mulligan,et al.  Effect of contrast on the perceived direction of a moving plaid , 1990, Vision Research.

[51]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[52]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Harry S. Orbach,et al.  Computing feature motion without feature detectors: A model for terminator motion without end-stopped cells 1 This research was first reported at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, May 1997. 1 , 1999, Vision Research.

[54]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[55]  Eric Castet,et al.  The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli , 1999, Vision Research.

[56]  David Bradley MT signals: better with time , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Assimilation and contrast in motion perception: Explorations in cooperativity , 1990, Vision Research.

[58]  H R Wilson,et al.  A model for motion coherence and transparency , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[59]  J. Lund,et al.  Widespread periodic intrinsic connections in the tree shrew visual cortex. , 1982, Science.

[60]  G. Blasdel,et al.  Physiological organization of layer 4 in macaque striate cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[61]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[62]  C D Salzman,et al.  Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision. , 1994, Science.

[63]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Factors affecting motion integration. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[64]  D Purves,et al.  A wholly empirical explanation of perceived motion , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  H. Rodman,et al.  Single-unit analysis of pattern-motion selective properties in the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[66]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex. , 1993, Science.

[67]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  Jeounghoon Kim,et al.  Dependence of plaid motion coherence on component grating directions , 1993, Vision Research.

[69]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Coordinate transformations in the representation of spatial information , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[70]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns depends on duration, contrast and eccentricity , 1992, Vision Research.

[71]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  The primal sketch revisited: locating and representing edges in human vision via Gaussian-derivative filtering , 2002 .

[72]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Theories for the Visual Perception of Local Velocity and Coherent Motion , 1991 .

[73]  Robert Jefferson Snowden,et al.  Motions in orthogonal directions are mutually suppressive , 1989 .

[74]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.