Methods for assessing the effectiveness of using bone morphogenetic proteins in spondylodesis

BACKGROUND: Today, growth factors, in particular bone morphogenetic proteins in the composition of osteoplastic materials, are widely used to accelerate bone tissue regeneration after injuries or diseases of the musculoskeletal system. There are various methods for evaluating the effectiveness of using these proteins, in particular, the methods for medical imaging and determining specific markers. Bone loss often occurs after trauma or injury, including surgery. Rapid impairment of bone formation and increased bone resorption, as reflected by biochemical markers of bone metabolism, may cause this bone loss. Therefore, the detection of these markers in patients after spinal fusion using bone morphogenetic proteins is important in assessing the effectiveness of this therapy at various stages of observation in the postoperative period. However, due to the widespread use of bone morphogenetic proteins, their therapeutic efficacy can increasingly be seen in everyday radiological practice. X-ray or computed tomography is usually used to assess the effectiveness of the surgical intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging may be a useful adjunct, however, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging analysis is vulnerable to hardware artifacts. Although there is extensive data in the literature on the outcomes of surgical interventions for spondylodesis using bone morphogenetic proteins, radiographic data and data on the detection of specific markers and their use are scarce. AIM: In this study, we will discuss the current knowledge about existing and possible methods for evaluating the effectiveness of the use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spondylodesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar, we conducted a comprehensive literature search demonstrating possible methods for evaluating the effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins in spondylodesis. RESULTS: This study presents various methods for determining the effectiveness of the use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spondylodesis. In addition, the results of preclinical and clinical studies, which analyzed the effectiveness of the use of bone morphogenetic proteins, have been analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: To identify the effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins in spondylodesis further preclinical and clinical studies are required.

[1]  J. Payer,et al.  Parathyroid Hormone-Related Changes of Bone Structure. , 2021, Physiological research.

[2]  K. Şahin,et al.  Magnesium Picolinate Improves Bone Formation by Regulation of RANK/RANKL/OPG and BMP-2/Runx2 Signaling Pathways in High-Fat Fed Rats , 2021, Nutrients.

[3]  Yi Wang,et al.  Parathyroid hormone and its related peptides in bone metabolism. , 2021, Biochemical pharmacology.

[4]  V. Alt,et al.  Molecular enhancement of fracture healing - Is there a role for bone Morphogenetic Protein-2, Parathyroid Hormone, statins, or sclerostin-antibodies? , 2021, Injury.

[5]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Modeling cortical bone adaptation using strain gradients , 2021, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  A. Hayes,et al.  Osteocalcin and vascular function: is there a cross-talk? , 2021, Molecular metabolism.

[7]  H. Yasuda Discovery of the RANKL/RANK/OPG system , 2021, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[8]  J. Delaissé,et al.  Re-thinking the bone remodeling cycle mechanism and the origin of bone loss. , 2020, Bone.

[9]  M. Oyewumi,et al.  Overcoming barriers confronting application of protein therapeutics in bone fracture healing , 2020, Drug Delivery and Translational Research.

[10]  T. Komori What is the function of osteocalcin? , 2020, Journal of oral biosciences.

[11]  S. Vimalraj Alkaline Phosphatase: Structure, Expression and its Function in Bone Mineralization. , 2020, Gene.

[12]  P. Szulc Biochemical bone turnover markers in hormonal disorders in adults: a narrative review , 2020, Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.

[13]  M. Moghadasian,et al.  RANKL/RANK/OPG Pathway: A Mechanism Involved in Exercise-Induced Bone Remodeling , 2020, BioMed research international.

[14]  L. Bonewald,et al.  The Osteocyte: New Insights. , 2020, Annual review of physiology.

[15]  A. Lupp,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of tissue and serum parameters of bone metabolism in a series of orthopaedic patients , 2019, PloS one.

[16]  Xiong-Gang Yang,et al.  Efficacy and safety of bone substitutes in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2019, European Spine Journal.

[17]  R. Recker,et al.  Bone remodeling and bone matrix quality before and after menopause in healthy women. , 2019, Bone.

[18]  D. Vohora,et al.  Biomarkers of Osteoporosis: An Update. , 2019, Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets.

[19]  F. Zhao,et al.  Complications and Prevention Strategies of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Technique , 2018, Orthopaedic surgery.

[20]  B. Yoon,et al.  Clinical Utility of Biochemical Marker of Bone Turnover: Fracture Risk Prediction and Bone Healing , 2018, Journal of bone metabolism.

[21]  V. Rosen,et al.  Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Based Therapeutic Approaches. , 2018, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[22]  J. Bassett,et al.  The bone remodelling cycle , 2018, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[23]  M. Doschak,et al.  Urinary Bone Turnover Markers as Target Indicators for Monitoring Bisphosphonate Drug Treatment in the Management of Osteoporosis. , 2017, Current drug targets.

[24]  K. Rijkers,et al.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[25]  P. Katsimbri The biology of normal bone remodelling , 2017, European journal of cancer care.

[26]  B. Clarke,et al.  Biochemical Testing Relevant to Bone. , 2017, Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America.

[27]  S. Khosla,et al.  Cathepsin K Inhibitors for Osteoporosis: Biology, Potential Clinical Utility, and Lessons Learned , 2017, Endocrine reviews.

[28]  S. Dhall,et al.  Bone Morphogenic Protein Use in Spinal Surgery. , 2017, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[29]  M. Benderitter,et al.  Synergistic effect of human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells on chronic wounds through hypoxia-inducible factor-1 α induction , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[30]  L. Felli,et al.  Extreme lateral interbody fusion in spinal revision surgery: clinical results and complications , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[31]  Jianru Wang,et al.  Comparison of the use of rhBMP-7 versus iliac crest autograft in single-level lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2017, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[32]  W. Yue,et al.  Bone Morphogenic Protein Is a Viable Adjunct for Fusion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2016, Asian spine journal.

[33]  Miho Nakamura,et al.  Osteoclasts and Remodeling Based Bone Formation. , 2016, Current stem cell research & therapy.

[34]  R. Chapurlat,et al.  Novel biological markers of bone: from bone metabolism to bone physiology. , 2016, Rheumatology.

[35]  R. Miron,et al.  Characterization of a shorter recombinant polypeptide chain of bone morphogenetic protein 2 on osteoblast behaviour , 2015, BMC Oral Health.

[36]  B. Larijani,et al.  Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover and their Role in Osteoporosis Diagnosis: A Narrative Review. , 2015, Recent patents on endocrine, metabolic & immune drug discovery.

[37]  P. Cerri,et al.  Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells , 2015, BioMed research international.

[38]  M. Veliky,et al.  Biochemical markers of bone collagen type I metabolism. , 2015, Ukrainian biochemical journal.

[39]  C. Cooper,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Reference Markers of Bone Turnover for Prediction of Fracture , 2014, Calcified Tissue International.

[40]  Arpita Tiwari,et al.  Effectiveness and Harms of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spine Fusion , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[41]  P. Liberski,et al.  Assessment of OPG/RANK/RANKL gene expression levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after treatment with strontium ranelate and ibandronate in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. , 2013, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[42]  T. Bellido Osteocyte-Driven Bone Remodeling , 2013, Calcified Tissue International.

[43]  J. Westendorf,et al.  Bone morphogenic protein 2 directly enhances differentiation of murine osteoclast precursors , 2010, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[44]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE SAFETY PROFILE OF BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN IN SPINE SURGERY , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[45]  J. Compston Skeletal actions of intermittent parathyroid hormone: effects on bone remodelling and structure. , 2007, Bone.

[46]  S. Doty,et al.  Alendronate Inhibits PTH (1–34)-induced Bone Morphogenetic Protein Expression in MC3T3-E1 Preosteoblastic Cells , 2007, HSS Journal.

[47]  P. Pietschmann,et al.  Serum levels of cathepsin K decrease with age in both women and men , 2005, Experimental Gerontology.

[48]  R. Baron,et al.  Opposite effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor-beta1 on osteoblast differentiation. , 2001, Bone.

[49]  M. Kumegawa,et al.  Direct stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and expression of BMP receptors in mature osteoclasts. , 2000, Bone.