Social Media and Multinational Corporations’ Corporate Social Responsibility in China: The Case of ConocoPhillips Oil Spill Incident

Research problem: The study attempts to study how an empowered Chinese public coped with and interpreted the environmental crisis of the ConocoPhillips oil spill and how ConocoPhillips reacted to the growing influence of social media. Research questions: In what ways did the Chinese public exercise its new power through social media in addressing the ConocoPhillips Oil Spill Incident? How did a multinational company like ConocoPhillips act during the crisis and react to the voices of the public through new media? Literature review: Social media has caused a power shift in China by allowing the ordinary Chinese public who used to be the silent majority to expose scandals and express their opinions about crises with greater freedom. At the same time, pressure is growing on corporations to exercise social responsibility, through responding to economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations that society has. Stakeholder theory indicates that only by meeting the needs and expectations of the individuals and groups who can affect or are affected by the firm's objectives can a firm survive and succeed. In developing countries, corporate social responsibility is characterized by a lack of systematic and institutionalized approach, with stakeholders, such as the public and community, being neglected for a long time. Methodology: Researchers conducted a thematic analysis of 932 microblog and blog entries about the ConocoPhillips Oil Spill Incident in China that were published on leading Chinese social media websites between June 2011 to February 2013. Results and discussion: The study found that the oil spill sparked an uproar of anger and criticism in the Chinese online community. Most posts on microblogs and blogs engaged in finding the causes and laying the blame for the oil spill. The overwhelming majority of the Chinese public attributed the crisis to the faulty laws and inaction on the part of the Chinese government regulators, to ConocoPhillips, and the Chinese joint venture partner China National Offshore Oil Corporation's failure to undertake due responsibilities. In response to mounting online criticisms, ConocoPhillips exhibited little interest in engaging with the Chinese public and showed poor communication in terms of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The study's theoretical contribution lies in combining CSR and Stakeholder theory with Discourse Power theory. Practical implications to multinational corporations seeking long-term business development in the developing country contexts, such as China, are that managers need to engage in responsive listening, actively participate in online conversations, and constantly scan the social media environment to manage its relations with the general public. Particularly, firms experiencing crises can gain the public's emotional support by communicating emotion-laden messages through social media.

[1]  A. Schaefer,et al.  Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities , 2001 .

[2]  Tom Kelleher,et al.  Social media use, perceptions of decision-making power, and public relations roles , 2009 .

[3]  T. V. Dijk.  Discourse studies : a multidisciplinary introduction , 2011 .

[4]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[5]  Maureen Taylor,et al.  Diffusion of traditional and new media tactics in crisis communication , 2005 .

[6]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[7]  Jae-Hwa Shin,et al.  The Gulf Coast oil spill: Extending the theory of image restoration discourse to the realm of social , 2011 .

[8]  Tom Kelleher,et al.  Organizational Blogs and the Human Voice: Relational Strategies and Relational Outcomes , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[10]  Dirk Matten,et al.  Multinational Corporation Codes of Conduct: Governance Tools for Corporate Social Responsibility? , 2008 .

[11]  Fei Li,et al.  Corporate social responsibility as a legitimate concern for Chinese enterprises: An analysis of media depictions , 2011 .

[12]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students , 2012 .

[13]  H. Ladegaard.  Negotiation style, speech accommodation and small talk in Sino-Western business negotiations: A Hong Kong case study , 2011 .

[14]  N. Smith,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? , 2003 .

[15]  Jinbong Choi,et al.  A content analysis of BP's press releases dealing with crisis , 2012 .

[16]  Norman Fairclough,et al.  Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report , 2011 .

[17]  Sherry J. Holladay,et al.  Communication and Attributions in a Crisis: An Experimental Study in Crisis Communication , 1996 .

[18]  G. Isabeau.  “Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited““, ... , 2010 .

[19]  Kaye D. Sweetser,et al.  PR practitioners’ use of social media tools and communication technology , 2008 .

[20]  Heli Wang,et al.  Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Financial Performance: The Roles of Stakeholder Response and Political Access , 2011 .

[21]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Choosing Is Believing? How Web Gratifications and Reliance Affect Internet Credibility Among Politically Interested Users , 2010 .

[22]  Aditi Bhatia,et al.  The Corporate Social Responsibility Report: The Hybridization of a “Confused” Genre (2007–2011) , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[23]  Heli Wang,et al.  Corporate Philanthropy and Financial Performance : The Roles of Social Expectations and Political Access , 2014 .

[24]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  The political blogosphere in China: A content analysis of the blogs regarding the dismissal of Shanghai leader Chen Liangyu , 2009, New Media Soc..

[25]  Trent Seltzer,et al.  The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building , 2007 .

[26]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Yoonhyeung Choi,et al.  Consumer Responses to Mattel Product Recalls Posted on Online Bulletin Boards: Exploring Two Types of Emotion , 2009 .

[28]  Thomas W. Dunfee,et al.  How Binding the Ties? Business Ethics as Integrative Social ContractsTies That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics , 1999 .

[29]  Guobin Yang,et al.  The Internet and Civil Society in China: A preliminary assessment , 2003 .

[30]  Teun A. van Dijk.  Discourse studies and hermeneutics , 2011 .

[31]  Keri K. Stephens,et al.  If the Organizations Won't Give Us Information…: The Use of Multiple New Media for Crisis Technical Translation and Dialogue , 2009 .

[32]  M. Morsing,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies , 2006 .

[33]  Andreas Falkenberg,et al.  When in Rome ... Moral Maturity and Ethics for International Economic Organizations , 2004 .

[34]  Justin Tan,et al.  Institutional Structure and Firm Social Performance in Transitional Economies: Evidence of Multinational Corporations in China , 2009 .

[35]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  The BP Oil Spill as a Cultural Anomaly? Institutional Context, Conflict, and Change , 2010 .

[36]  Issam c.,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,... , 2014 .

[37]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less , 2010, ArXiv.

[38]  Matt Barton.  The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheres , 2005 .

[39]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[40]  Jonathan Sullivan,et al.  China’s Weibo: Is faster different? , 2014, New Media Soc..

[41]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[42]  S. Utz,et al.  Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication on twitter, blogs and traditional media , 2011 .

[43]  Stephen. Pavelin,et al.  Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit , 2006 .

[44]  W. T. Coombs,et al.  Impact of Past Crises on Current Crisis Communication , 2004 .

[45]  Kaye D. Trammell,et al.  Examining the New Influencers: A Self-Presentation Study of A-List Blogs , 2005 .

[46]  L. Men,et al.  Beyond liking or following: Understanding public engagement on social networking sites in China , 2013 .

[47]  Frederick R. Post.  The Social Responsibility of Management: A Critique of the Shareholder Paradigm and Defense of Stakeholder Primacy , 2003 .

[48]  Claude Emerson Welch,et al.  Multinational Corporations and the Ethics of Global Responsibility: Problems and Possibilities , 2003 .

[49]  Tao Sun,et al.  Media dependencies in a changing media environment: the case of the 2003 SARS epidemic in China , 2007, New Media Soc..

[50]  Richard D. Waters,et al.  Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations Twitter updates , 2011 .

[51]  Claire H. Procopio,et al.  Do You Know What It Means to Miss New Orleans? Internet Communication, Geographic Community, and Social Capital in Crisis , 2007 .

[52]  Jörg Andriof,et al.  Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement , 2017 .

[53]  Matthew W. Seeger,et al.  Communication, Organization, and Crisis , 1998 .

[54]  Shruti Gupta,et al.  Consumer stakeholder view of corporate social responsibility: a comparative analysis from USA and India , 2011 .

[55]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[56]  Francis O. Adeola,et al.  Environmental Injustice and Human Rights Abuse: The States, MNCs, and Repression of Minority Groups in the World System , 2001 .

[57]  Bin Sheng,et al.  From China Local Case to Study the Corporate Social Responsibility of the Multinational Corporations and the Functions of Host Governments , 2009 .

[58]  A. Scherer,et al.  Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility - Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective , 2007 .

[59]  Antonio Argandoña,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good , 1998 .

[60]  Gang Han,et al.  Starbucks is forbidden in the Forbidden City: Blog, circuit of culture and informal public relations campaign in China , 2009 .

[61]  Jill Walker Rettberg.  ‘Freshly Generated for You, and Barack Obama’ , 2009 .

[62]  A. Pang,et al.  Negotiating crisis in the social media environment: Evolution of crises online, gaining credibility offline , 2014 .

[63]  Dima Jamali,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context , 2007 .

[64]  Robert L. Heath,et al.  New Communication Technologies: An Issues Management Point of View. , 1998 .

[65]  Carol M. Sánchez.  Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics , 1999 .

[66]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in Organizations , 2004 .

[67]  Jonathan Hassid,et al.  The Politics of China's Emerging Micro-Blogs: Something New or More of the Same? , 2012 .

[68]  Jieyun Feng.  Advertising discourses and social changes in China : an investigation of the changing advertising discourses in Yangcheng Evening News and Nanfang Daily from 1980 to 2002 , 2008 .