Polyhedral Model Retrieval Using Weighted Point Sets

Due to the recent improvements in laser scanning technology, 3D visualization and modeling, there is an increasing need for tools supporting the automatic search for 3D objects in archives. In this paper we describe a new geometric approach to 3D shape comparison and retrieval for arbitrary objects described by 3D polyhedral models that may contain gaps. In contrast with the existing approaches, our approach takes the overall relative spatial location into account by representing the 3D shape as a weighted point set. To compare two objects geometrically, we enclose each object by a 3D grid and generate a weighted point set, which represents a salient point for each non-empty grid cell. We compare three methods to obtain a salient point and a weight in each grid cell: (1) choosing the vertex in the cell with the highest Gaussian curvature, and choosing a measure as weight for that curvature, (2) choosing the area-weighted mean of the vertices in the cell, and choosing a measure as weight denoting the normal variation of the facets in the cell and (3) choosing the center of mass of all vertices in the cell, and choosing one as weight. Finally, we compute the similarity between two shapes by comparing their weighted point sets using a new shape similarity measure based on weight transportation that is a variation of the Earth Mover's Distance. Unlike the Earth Mover's Distance, the new shape similarity measure satisfies the triangle inequality. This property makes it suitable for use in indexing schemes, that depend on the triangle inequality, such as the one we introduce, based on the so-called vantage objects. The strength of our approach is proven through experimental results using a database consisting of 133 models such as mugs, cars and boats, and a database consisting of 512 models, mostly air planes, classified into conventional air planes, delta-jets, multi-fuselages, biplanes, helicopters and other models. The results show that the retrieval performance is better than related shape matching methods.

[1]  Remco C. Veltkamp,et al.  Shape matching: similarity measures and algorithms , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[2]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Dynamic 3D models with local and global deformations: deformable superquadrics , 1990, [1990] Proceedings Third International Conference on Computer Vision.

[3]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Image processing, the fundamentals , 2001 .

[4]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  Indexing and retrieval of 3D models aided by active learning , 2001, MULTIMEDIA '01.

[5]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  A geometric approach to 3D object comparison , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[6]  C. Calladine.  Gaussian curvature and shell structures , 1984 .

[7]  Chin Seng Chua,et al.  Point Signatures: A New Representation for 3D Object Recognition , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  J. A. Gregory.  The Mathematics of Surfaces. , 1987 .

[9]  R. Veltkamp,et al.  EÆcient Image Retrieval through Vantage Objects ? , 1999 .

[10]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  A Reflective Symmetry Descriptor , 2002, ECCV.

[11]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Shape Evolution With Structural and Topological Changes Using Blending , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Remco C. Veltkamp,et al.  A Pseudo-Metric for Weighted Point Sets , 2002, ECCV.

[13]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Matching 3D models with shape distributions , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[14]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  A metric for distributions with applications to image databases , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[15]  Taku Komura,et al.  Topology matching for fully automatic similarity estimation of 3D shapes , 2001, SIGGRAPH.

[16]  William C. Regli,et al.  Machining feature-based comparisons of mechanical parts , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[17]  Dietmar Saupe,et al.  3D Shape Descriptor Based on 3D Fourier Transform , 2001 .

[18]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Tracking Points on Deformable Objects Using Curvature Information , 1992, ECCV.

[19]  Ryutarou Ohbuchi,et al.  Shape-similarity search of three-dimensional models using parameterized statistics , 2002, 10th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2002. Proceedings..

[20]  Andrew E. Johnson,et al.  Using Spin Images for Efficient Object Recognition in Cluttered 3D Scenes , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Shape distributions , 2002, TOGS.

[22]  Michael Elad,et al.  Content based retrieval of VRML objects: an iterative and interactive approach , 2002 .

[23]  B. Kimia,et al.  3D object recognition using shape similiarity-based aspect graph , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.

[24]  Jarek Rossignac,et al.  Multi-resolution 3D approximations for rendering complex scenes , 1993, Modeling in Computer Graphics.

[25]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  3D Shape Histograms for Similarity Search and Classification in Spatial Databases , 1999, SSD.

[26]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  A Survey Of Free-Form Object Representation and Recognition Techniques , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[27]  Remco C. Veltkamp,et al.  Efficient image retrieval through vantage objects , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[28]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance under transformation sets , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[29]  James C. French,et al.  Using the triangle inequality to reduce the number of comparisons required for similarity-based retrieval , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[30]  Benjamin Watson,et al.  Model Simplification Through Refinement , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[31]  Martial Hebert,et al.  On 3D shape similarity , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[32]  Luiz A. Costa,et al.  Determining the similarity of deformable shapes , 1995, Vision Research.

[33]  Marc Rioux,et al.  Description of shape information for 2-D and 3-D objects , 2000, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[34]  Anthony Pugh,et al.  Polyhedra: A Visual Approach , 1976 .

[35]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  A search engine for 3D models , 2003, TOGS.

[36]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Dynamic 3D Models with Local and Global Deformations: Deformable Superquadrics , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[37]  Peter Braß.  On the nonexistence of Hausdorff-like metrics for fuzzy sets , 2002, Pattern Recognit. Lett..