Design and simulation analysis of a soft manipulator based on honeycomb pneumatic networks

In this paper, we introduce a systematic process of design, simulation and experimental validation of a manipulator based on the honeycomb pneumatic network (HPN) structure. The HPN structure shows potential in achieving balance between flexibility and load bearing capacity, which overcomes the shortcoming of pneumatic networks in strength. To reach the best performance of both features above, we establish explicit evaluation criteria and conduct specific simulation experiments employing nonlinear finite element method (FEM). Finally, the manipulator prototype is validated to have decent load bearing capacities as well as flexibility in experimental tests.

[1]  Hao Sun,et al.  Towards Honeycomb PneuNets Robots , 2013, RiTA.

[2]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Hao Sun,et al.  Evolving Honeycomb Pneumatic Finger in Bullet Physics Engine , 2014, RiTA.

[4]  Cagdas D. Onal,et al.  Design and control of a soft and continuously deformable 2D robotic manipulation system , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[5]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[6]  B Mazzolai,et al.  Soft-robotic arm inspired by the octopus: II. From artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[7]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  A Bending Pneumatic Rubber Actuator Realizing Soft-bodied Manta Swimming Robot , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  RusDaniela,et al.  Design, kinematics, and control of a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator , 2016 .

[9]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Design and experimental testing of the OctArm soft robot manipulator , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Design, kinematics, and control of a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[12]  Daniela Rus,et al.  A Recipe for Soft Fluidic Elastomer Robots , 2015, Soft robotics.

[13]  Siddharth Sanan,et al.  Soft Inflatable Robots for Safe Physical Human Interaction , 2013 .

[14]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Robust, Low-cost, Highly Articulated manipulator enabled by jamming of granular media , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  MajidiCarmel,et al.  Soft Robotics: A Perspective—Current Trends and Prospects for the Future , 2014 .

[16]  Tao Deng,et al.  Development of a new cable-driven soft robot for cardiac ablation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[17]  N. Giri,et al.  Continuum robots and underactuated grasping , 2011 .

[18]  S. Wakimoto,et al.  Development of pneumatic rubber actuator of 400μm in diameter generating bi-directional bending motion , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO 2014).

[19]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Design and development of a soft robotic octopus arm exploiting embodied intelligence , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.