Numerical Investigation of Flow in an Overexpanded Nozzle with Porous Surfaces

A new porous condition has been implemented in the PAB3D solver for simulating the flow over porous surfaces. The newly-added boundary condition is utilized to compute the flow field of a non-axisymmetric, convergent-divergent nozzle incorporating porous cavities for shock-boundary layer interaction control. The nozzle has an expansion ratio (exit area/throat area) of 1.797 and a design nozzle pressure ratio of 8.78. The flow fields for a baseline nozzle (no porosity) and for a nozzle with porous surfaces (10% porosity ratio) are computed for NPR varying from 2.01 to 9.54. Computational model results indicate that the over-expanded nozzle flow was dominated by shock-induced boundary-layer separation. Porous configurations were capable of controlling off-design separation in the nozzle by encouraging stable separation of the exhaust flow. Computational simulation results, wall centerline pressure, mach contours, and thrust efficiency ratio are presented and discussed. Computed results are in excellent agreement with experimental data.

[1]  Ana Fiorella Tinetti.  On the Use of Surface Porosity to Reduce Wake-Stator Interaction Noise , 2001 .

[2]  Sally A. Viken,et al.  Advanced Aerodynamic Design of Passive Porosity Control Effectors , 2001 .

[3]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[4]  R. J. Re,et al.  Static internal performance including thrust vectoring and reversing of two-dimensional convergent-divergent nozzles , 1984 .

[5]  A Boundary Condition for Simulation of Flow Over Porous Surfaces , 2001 .

[6]  Steven J. Massey,et al.  Enhancement and Validation of PAB3D for Unsteady Aerodynamics , 2003 .

[7]  R. Bush,et al.  Engine face and screen loss models for CFD applications , 1997 .

[8]  Mehul P. Patel,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Reconfigurable Porosity for Aerodynamic Control , 2004 .

[9]  J. Carlson.  Applications of Algebraic Reynolds Stress Turbulence Models Part 2: Transonic Shock-Separated Afterbody , 1997 .

[10]  Craig A. Hunter,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Separated Nozzle Flows , 2004 .

[11]  C Asbury Scott,et al.  Static Performance of a Fixed-Geometry Exhaust Nozzle Incorporating Porous Cavities for Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction Control , 1999 .

[12]  Craig A. Hunter,et al.  Experimental, Theoretical, and Computational Investigation of Separated Nozzle Flows , 1998 .

[13]  J. Lumley,et al.  A new Reynolds stress algebraic equation model , 1994 .

[14]  S. Girimaji.  Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model , 1995 .

[15]  Khaled S. Abdol-Hamid,et al.  Implementation of Algebraic Stress Models in a General 3-D Navier-Stokes Method (PAB3D) , 1995 .

[16]  Mehul P. Patel,et al.  Flow Control Using Reconfigurable Porosity , 2003 .

[17]  C Asbury Scott,et al.  A Passive Cavity Concept for Improving the Off-Design Performance of Fixed Geometry Exhaust Nozzles , 1996 .