From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact.

A computer simulation modeled the change of attitudes in a population resulting from the interactive, reciprocal, and reeursive operation of Latan~'s (198 I) theory of social impact, which specifies principles underlying how individuals are affected by their social environment. Surprisingly, several macrolevel phenomena emerged from the simple operation of this microlevei theory, including an incomplete polarization of opinions reaching a stable equilibrium, with coherent minority subgroups managing to exist near the margins of the whole population. Computer simulations, neglected in group dynamics for 20 years, may, as in modern physics, help determine the extent to which group-level phenomena result from individual-level processes. Writing about social phenomena, social scientists have produced empirical generalizations and theoretical analyses of social processes representing differing levels of social reality. Some analyses concern the cognitions, feelings, and behavior of individuals; others deal with small, medium, or large groups, collectivities, and organizations; still others involve such largescale human aggregates and systems as nations, societies, or cultures. Theories can be and are formulated and tested independently for phenomena at each of these levels, but one can also ask about the relations between mechanisms operating at different levels (Doise, 1986; Kenny, 1987; Nowak, 1976). These relations may be of two kinds. The functioning of higher level units (e.g., social groups) may be partly or completely determined and therefore explained by mechanisms known from theories describing phenomena at lower levels (e.g., human individuals). Alternatively, the functioning of lower level units (e.g., individuals) may be affected by the higher level units to which they belong. In other words, individuals in a given social context behave differently than they would outside that context. These relations, taken together, suggest that the interactive impact of individuals and their social context can result in the emergence of new regularities at the levels of both the individual

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life. , 1949 .

[3]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[4]  L. Festinger,et al.  Social pressures in informal groups , 1950 .

[5]  L. Festinger Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[6]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness , 1951 .

[7]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  H. Kelley,et al.  The Resistance to Change of Group-Anchored Attitudes , 1952 .

[9]  William Allen,et al.  The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness , 1953 .

[10]  Gerald A. P. Carrothers An Historical Bedew of the Gravity and Potential Concepts of Human Interaction , 1956 .

[11]  S. Greer,et al.  The Mass Society and the Parapolitical Structure , 1962 .

[12]  Leon Festinger,et al.  The Effectiveness of "Overheard" Persuasive Communications , 1962 .

[13]  B. Cohen Conflict And Conformity: A Probability Model And Its Application , 1963 .

[14]  A. Bernstein,et al.  A COMPUTER SIMULATION MODEL OF COMMUNITY REFERENDUM CONTROVERSIES , 1963 .

[15]  W H MCWHINNEY SIMULATING THE COMMUNICATION NETWORK EXPERIMENTS. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[16]  Harold Gulliksen,et al.  Contributions to mathematical psychology , 1964 .

[17]  Metropolitics: A Study of Political Culture. , 1964 .

[18]  R. Faris,et al.  Handbook of modern sociology , 1965 .

[19]  T. Brock,et al.  COMMUNICATOR-RECIPIENT SIMILARITY AND DECISION CHANGE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Torsten Hägerstrand,et al.  A Monte Carlo Approach to Diffusion , 1965, European Journal of Sociology.

[21]  The Use of Electronic Computers in the Study of Social Organisation , 1965, European Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Kullervo Rainio Social Interaction as a Stochastic Learning Process , 1965, European Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[24]  B. A. Farbey,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1966 .

[25]  D. Apter,et al.  Ideology and discontent , 1966 .

[26]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator , 1966 .

[27]  R. Putnam Political Attitudes and the Local Community , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[28]  Mathematical explorations in behavioral science , 1966 .

[29]  S. Bochner,et al.  Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. , 1966 .

[30]  S. Moscovici,et al.  The group as a polarizer of attitudes. , 1969 .

[31]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[32]  W. Crano,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation of a Hyperbolic Model of Attitude Change. , 1972 .

[33]  J. H. Davis Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[34]  George R. Goethals,et al.  Similarity in the influence process: The belief-value distinction. , 1973 .

[35]  Ada W. Finifter The Friendship Group as a Protective Environment for Political Deviants , 1974 .

[36]  Bernard P. Cohen,et al.  Conflict, conformity, and social status , 1975 .

[37]  S. Chaiken,et al.  An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. , 1975 .

[38]  Understanding and prediction : essays in the methodology of social and behavioral theories , 1976 .

[39]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Social Influence And Social Change , 1976 .

[40]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[41]  Norman H. Nie,et al.  The Changing American Voter. , 1976 .

[42]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Cross-modality matches suggest anticipated stage fright a multiplicative power function of audience size and status , 1976 .

[43]  R. Harris The uncertain connection between verbal theories and research hypotheses in social psychology , 1976 .

[44]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization , 1977 .

[45]  H. Lasswell,et al.  On political sociology , 1977 .

[46]  A. Tesser Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[47]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[48]  S. Chaiken Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. , 1979 .

[49]  R. Abelson CHAPTER 13 – SOCIAL CLUSTERS AND OPINION CLUSTERS , 1979 .

[50]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[51]  John Ziman,et al.  Models of disorder , 1979 .

[52]  Reid Hastie,et al.  A computer simulation of jury decision making. , 1980 .

[53]  Bibb Latané,et al.  All alone in front of all those people: Stage fright as a function of number and type of co-performers and audience. , 1981 .

[54]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. , 1981 .

[55]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Stages in the Analysis of Persuasive Messages: The Role of Causal Attributions and Message Comprehension. , 1981 .

[56]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[57]  B. Latané,et al.  The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities. , 1981 .

[58]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[59]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[60]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  S. Wolf,et al.  Majority and minority influences on restaurant preferences. , 1983 .

[62]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .

[63]  S. Penrod,et al.  Computer Modeling of Influence in the Jury: The Role of the Consistent Juror , 1983 .

[64]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. , 1984 .

[65]  M. M. Ferree,et al.  Zeitgeist as an Empirical Phenomenon@@@The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion--Our Social Skin. , 1985 .

[66]  Norman Miller,et al.  Assumed Similarity and Opinion Certainty , 1985 .

[67]  N. Lin,et al.  Social structure and network analysis , 1985 .

[68]  S. Moscovici Social influence and conformity , 1985 .

[69]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[70]  C. Lumsden Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London (1985), viii, +301. Price $29.95 , 1986 .

[71]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[72]  Arthur Meier Schlesinger,et al.  The Cycles of American History , 1986 .

[73]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986 .

[74]  W. Doise,et al.  Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology , 1986 .

[75]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[76]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Thought experiments and the problem of sparse data in small-group performance research. , 1986 .

[77]  Debashish Chowdhury,et al.  Spin Glasses and Other Frustrated Systems , 1986 .

[78]  Courtney L. Brown,et al.  Political Context and Attitude Change , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[79]  James Gleick,et al.  Chaos, Making a New Science , 1987 .

[80]  Social science should invest in infrastructure. , 1987 .

[81]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making , 1988 .

[82]  David Pines,et al.  Emerging Syntheses In Science , 1988 .

[83]  T. Ostrom Computer simulation: the third symbol system , 1988 .

[84]  James Gleick,et al.  Chaos: Making a New Science , 1989 .

[85]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Peer Group Influence , 1990 .

[86]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[87]  Gerhard Werner,et al.  Computer-Assisted Theory Building: Modeling Dynamic Social Systems , 1990 .