Correlation between ω and ψ Dihedral Angles in Protein Structures

The planarity of the peptide group is one of the fundamental features of protein structure that is described in every chemistry and biochemistry textbook. By surveying a dataset of 163 atomic resolution protein structures we here identify the stereochemical conditions that favor significant deformations of peptide bond planarity. In particular, we demonstrate that the values of the ω dihedral angle are strictly correlated to the values of the adjacent ψ angle. This trend is also observed in highly strained states such as those occurring in vicinal disulfide bridges. These findings provide direct evidence for the mutual influence of the geometrical parameters that describe the protein structure.

[1]  M. Paddon-Row,et al.  Origin of .pi.-facial stereoselectivity in additions to .pi.-bonds: generality of the anti-periplanar effect , 1981 .

[2]  Z. Dauter,et al.  The benefits of atomic resolution. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Improvements and extensions in the conformational database potential for the refinement of NMR and X-ray structures of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[4]  C. Lecomte,et al.  Ultra-high-resolution X-ray structure of proteins , 2004, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[5]  Ab Initio Study of the Conformational Dependence of the Nonplanarity of the Peptide Group , 2000 .

[6]  G. A. Jeffrey,et al.  Pyramidalization of carbonyl carbons in asymmetric environments: carboxylates, amides, and amino acids , 1985 .

[7]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  The non-planar peptide unit. II. Comparison of theory with crystal structure data. , 1973, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  J. Priestle.  Improved dihedral-angle restraints for protein structure refinement , 2003 .

[9]  L. Vitagliano,et al.  Pyramidalization of backbone carbonyl carbon atoms in proteins. , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  S. Hayward,et al.  Peptide‐plane flipping in proteins , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[12]  Oliviero Carugo,et al.  Vicinal disulfide turns. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[13]  J. Thornton,et al.  Deviations from planarity of the peptide bond in peptides and proteins. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  L. Pauling,et al.  The pleated sheet, a new layer configuration of polypeptide chains. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs , 1991 .

[16]  L. Pauling,et al.  The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. , 1951, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  David Eisenberg,et al.  The discovery of the α-helix and β-sheet, the principal structural features of proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  P. Karplus.  Experimentally observed conformation‐dependent geometry and hidden strain in proteins , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  Luciana Esposito,et al.  Recent advances in atomic resolution protein crystallography. , 2002, Protein and peptide letters.

[20]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Theory of the non-planar peptide unit. , 1973, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  G. N. Ramachandhan.  Need for nonplanar peptide units in polypeptide chains. , 1968 .

[22]  A. Edison.  Linus Pauling and the planar peptide bond , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.