Attentional control, high intensity pleasure, and risky pedestrian behavior in college students.

Individual differences in temperament and personality are closely linked to motor vehicle safety. However, 13% of Americans who die in transportation-related injuries are not killed in motor vehicle crashes, but rather in pedestrian injuries. This study was designed to study links between two individual difference measures, attentional control and high intensity pleasure, and pedestrian injury risk among college students, a group at particular risk of pedestrian injury. A sample of 245 students completed a temperament questionnaire and engaged in a street-crossing task within an interactive, immersive virtual pedestrian environment. Individuals scoring high on attentional control (the capacity to focus and shift attention, one facet of conscientiousness) waited longer to choose gaps to cross within and showed some tendency to choose larger gaps after waiting. Individuals scoring high in high intensity pleasure (the tendency to desire novel, complex, and varied stimuli, one facet of sensation-seeking) were more likely to experience collisions with traffic in the virtual environment. Theoretical and applied implications are discussed.

[1]  Sharon Clarke,et al.  An Examination of the Role of Personality in Work Accidents Using Meta‐analysis , 2008 .

[2]  B A Jonah,et al.  Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Sharon Clarke,et al.  A meta‐analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non‐occupational settings , 2005 .

[4]  M. Zuckerman Behavioral Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking , 1994 .

[5]  Guohua Li,et al.  Injury prevention and control. , 2007, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[6]  Joan Severson,et al.  Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  D. French,et al.  Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination method and findings. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  N. Weinstein Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[9]  T. Rundmo,et al.  Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers , 2002 .

[10]  R. Vickers,et al.  Associations between major domains of personality and health behavior. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[11]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Individual difference factors in risky driving: the roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Six approaches to the explication of facet‐level traits: examples from conscientiousness , 1998 .

[13]  N D Weinstein,et al.  Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. , 1984, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[14]  D. Beirness DO WE REALLY DRIVE AS WE LIVE? THE ROLE OF PERSONALITY FACTORS IN ROAD CRASHES , 1993 .

[15]  Benjamin K Barton,et al.  The roles of age, gender, inhibitory control, and parental supervision in children's pedestrian safety. , 2006, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[16]  Katherine W. Byington,et al.  Effect of Cell Phone Distraction on Pediatric Pedestrian Injury Risk , 2009, Pediatrics.

[17]  Ryan C. Martin,et al.  Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Temperament and personality: origins and outcomes. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.