Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non‐contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients

Background:  To compare the intraocular pressure readings obtained with the iCare rebound tonometer and the 7CR non‐contact tonometer with those measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.

[1]  M. Gordon,et al.  Effect of measurement order between right and left eyes on intraocular pressure measurement. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  D. Wallace,et al.  Evaluation of the ICare Rebound Tonometer as a Home Intraocular Pressure Monitoring Device , 2011, Journal of glaucoma.

[3]  Joshua R. Ehrlich,et al.  Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser , 2010, Eye.

[4]  S. Fieuws,et al.  Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer , 2010, International Ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Jorge,et al.  Comparison of the IOPen® and iCare® rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population , 2010, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  A. Wells,et al.  The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[7]  M. Lanza,et al.  Corneal Parameters and Difference Between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Normal Eyes , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[8]  J. González-Méijome,et al.  Correlations Between Corneal Biomechanical Properties Measured With the Ocular Response Analyzer and ICare Rebound Tonometry , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[9]  J. B. Rehnman,et al.  Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension , 2008, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  G. Hobbs,et al.  Correlation of Intraocular Pressure Measured With Goldmann and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[11]  L. Abraham,et al.  Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists , 2008, Eye.

[12]  H. Thieme,et al.  Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range , 2008, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Mills,et al.  Clinical Comparison of the Icare Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[14]  J. González-Méijome,et al.  Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population , 2005, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  D. Luce.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  A. Kontiola,et al.  A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. , 2000, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[17]  A. Kontiola,et al.  A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure , 1997, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[18]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[19]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[20]  J. Moreno-Montañés,et al.  Comparation of the new rebound tonometer IOPen and the Goldmann tonometer, and their relationship to corneal properties , 2011, Eye.

[21]  A. Lam,et al.  The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[22]  K. D. Eichenbaum,et al.  Comparing dynamic contour tonometry to Goldmann and hand-held tonometry in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations , 2007, Annals of ophthalmology.