Career aspirations, perceived instrumentality, and achievement in undergraduate computer science courses

Abstract This research investigated the relationships among undergraduate computer science students’ computer-science-related career aspirations, perceived instrumentality (PI) for computer science courses, and achievement in those courses. Specifically, the two studies examined (a) change in PI and career aspirations during a single semester, (b) the relationship between change in career aspirations and change in PI, and (c) the influence of career aspirations, PI, and change in career aspirations and PI on achievement in computer science courses. Findings from both studies revealed that students experienced a decrease in endogenous PI and career aspirations and an increase in exogenous PI during the semester. Study 1 showed that non-computer science majors experienced greater shifts in PI and career aspirations than computer science majors. Study 2 showed that the change in PI happened in parallel and was curvilinear, with more change happening in the first half of the semester than the second half. Both studies also showed that computer-science-related career aspirations were associated with PI, and that aspirations and PI had a stronger relationship with scores on a computer science knowledge test than with course grades. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  Control, Motivation, Affect, and Strategic Self-Regulation in the College Classroom : A Multidimensional Phenomenon , 2008 .

[2]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[3]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Learning through computational creativity , 2015, Commun. ACM.

[4]  E. Alpay,et al.  Student enthusiasm for engineering: charting changes in student aspirations and motivation , 2008 .

[5]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Student motivation and self-regulation as a function of future time perspective and perceived instrumentality. , 2000 .

[6]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Computational Creativity Exercises: An Avenue for Promoting Learning in Computer Science , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[7]  John R. Staver,et al.  Examining Relationships Between Factors of Science Education and Student Career Aspiration , 2001 .

[8]  Willy Lens,et al.  Placing Motivation and Future Time Perspective Theory in a Temporal Perspective , 2004 .

[9]  C. Montmarquette,et al.  How do Young People Choose College Majors , 2002 .

[10]  Anthony P. Carnevale,et al.  Recovery: Job Growth and Education Requirements through 2020. , 2013 .

[11]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Understanding student retention in computer science education: The role of environment, gains, barriers and usefulness , 2016, Education and Information Technologies.

[12]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[13]  S. Dewitte,et al.  The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: know why you learn, so you'll know what you learn! , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[14]  S. Lindblom-Ylänne,et al.  Understanding individual differences in approaches to learning across courses: A mixed method approach , 2016 .

[15]  Jonathan C. Hilpert,et al.  Examining students' future time perspective: Pathways to knowledge building , 2012 .

[16]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Profiles of Motivated Self-Regulation in College Computer Science Courses: Differences in Major versus Required Non-Major Courses , 2013 .

[17]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence , 2004 .

[18]  S. Dewitte,et al.  Wanting to have vs. wanting to be: the effect of perceived instrumentality on goal orientation. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[19]  Altay Eren,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Instrumentality and Future Time Perspective on Students' Graded Performance and Attitudes Regarding English Class* , 2010 .

[20]  Willy Lens,et al.  Academic Achievement and Future Time Perspective as a Cognitive-Motivational Concept , 1982 .

[21]  J. Plucker.  The Relationship Between School Climate Conditions and Student Aspirations , 1998 .

[22]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Gender and Orientations Toward the Future: Links to Motivation , 2004 .

[23]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The Multivariate Dimensionality of Personal Control and Future Time Perspective Beliefs in Achievement and Self-Regulation. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[24]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The role of the future in student motivation , 1999 .

[25]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  Volitional Strategies and Future Time Perspective: Embracing the Complexity of Dynamic Interactions. , 2000 .

[26]  Martina Nieswandt,et al.  “I Just Want The Credit!” – Perceived Instrumentality as the Main Characteristic of Boys’ Motivation in a Grade 11 Science Course , 2008 .

[27]  K. Bui.  First-Generation College Students at a Four-Year University: Background Characteristics, Reasons for Pursuing Higher Education, and First-Year Experiences , 2002 .

[28]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Big fish in little ponds aspire more: mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science , 2012 .

[29]  A. Leondari,et al.  Future time perspective, possible selves, and academic achievement , 2007 .

[30]  Karen M. O’Brien.  The Influence of Psychological Separation and Parental Attachment on the Career Development of Adolescent Women. , 1996 .

[31]  Deborah Bybee,et al.  A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. , 2002, Journal of adolescence.

[32]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation , 2004 .

[33]  Jenefer Husman,et al.  The Intersection of Students' Perceptions of Instrumentality, Self-Efficacy, and Goal Orientations in an Online Mathematics Course , 2007 .

[34]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task valuing. , 1999 .

[35]  Jessica Watkins,et al.  Retaining Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors , 2013 .

[36]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Motivational and Self‐Regulated Learning Profiles of Students Taking a Foundational Engineering Course , 2015 .

[37]  Martin V. Covington,et al.  Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future goal attainment: Effects on graded performance , 2005 .

[38]  D. Shell,et al.  Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective , 2008 .

[39]  George Relyea,et al.  The Relationships Among Students' Future-Oriented Goals and Subgoals, Perceived Task Instrumentality, and Task-Oriented Self-Regulation Strategies in an Academic Environment , 2008 .

[40]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[41]  Jonathan C. Hilpert,et al.  Future Time Perspective Connectedness to a Career: The Contextual Effects of Classroom Knowledge Building , 2016, Psychologica Belgica.

[42]  Altay Eren.  Exploring the Effects of Changes in Future Time Perspective and Perceived Instrumentality on Graded Performance. , 2017 .