Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation

[1]  Daniel M. McNeish,et al.  Psychological Methods Thanks Coefficient Alpha , We ’ ll Take It From Here , 2022 .

[2]  Moritz Körber,et al.  Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers’ Takeover Performance and Automation Trust , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Jessica Kay Flake,et al.  Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research , 2017 .

[5]  Stephen D. Short,et al.  A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources , 2017, Journal of sex research.

[6]  Amar R. Marathe,et al.  From Trust in Automation to Decision Neuroscience: Applying Cognitive Neuroscience Methods to Understand and Improve Interaction Decisions Involved in Human Automation Interaction , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  Tianyi Yan,et al.  Neural Responses to Central and Peripheral Objects in the Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Keep Your Scanners Peeled , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[9]  J. Krems,et al.  Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study , 2015 .

[10]  D. Betsy McCoach,et al.  The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom , 2015 .

[11]  Masooda Bashir,et al.  Trust in Automation , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Jonathon Love,et al.  Software to Sharpen Your Stats , 2015 .

[13]  Gerhard Mels,et al.  Choosing the Optimal Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Model Selection Perspective , 2013, Multivariate behavioral research.

[14]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures: An overview. , 2013 .

[15]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Trust in Automation , 2013, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[16]  R. Eisinga,et al.  The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? , 2013, International Journal of Public Health.

[17]  V. Savalei,et al.  When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[18]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective , 2012 .

[19]  Bettina B. Hoeppner,et al.  Comparative utility of a single-item versus multiple-item measure of self-efficacy in predicting relapse among young adults. , 2011, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[20]  Moritz Heene,et al.  Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[21]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research Conceptual issues and application guidelines , 2009 .

[22]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-Based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[23]  H. Moosbrugger,et al.  Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion , 2008 .

[24]  D. Wiegmann,et al.  Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review , 2007 .

[25]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[26]  Scott M. Galster,et al.  Effects of Reliable and Unreliable Automation on Subjective Measures of Mental Workload, Situation Awareness, Trust and Confidence in a Dynamic Flight Task , 2004 .

[27]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Conceptual Issues in the Study of Dynamic Hazard Warnings , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[28]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[29]  D. Betsy McCoach,et al.  SEM Isn't Just the Schoolwide Enrichment Model Anymore: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Gifted Education , 2003 .

[30]  J. Annett Subjective rating scales: science or art? , 2002, Ergonomics.

[31]  J. Sloan,et al.  Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores. , 2002, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[32]  M. Nagy Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction , 2002 .

[33]  Ann M. Bisantz,et al.  Assessment of operator trust in and utilization of automated decision-aids under different framing conditions , 2001 .

[34]  K. Trzesniewski,et al.  Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale , 2001 .

[35]  Norman L. Chervany,et al.  Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time , 2000, Trust in Cyber-societies.

[36]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[37]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems , 2000 .

[38]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[39]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[40]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[41]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[42]  K. Blomqvist The many faces of trust , 1997 .

[43]  J. Michell Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology , 1997 .

[44]  A. Damasio The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[46]  N. Moray,et al.  Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[47]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[48]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust in automation. I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems , 1994 .

[49]  A Kirlik,et al.  Modeling Strategic Behavior in Human-Automation Interaction: Why an "Aid" Can (and Should) Go Unused , 1993, Human factors.

[50]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[51]  John K. Butler Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory , 1991 .

[52]  Bonnie M. Muir,et al.  Trust Between Humans and Machines, and the Design of Decision Aids , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[53]  Robert K. Gable,et al.  Instrument Development in the Affective Domain , 1986 .

[54]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[55]  John K. Butler,et al.  A Behavioral Decision Theory Approach to Modeling Dyadic Trust in Superiors and Subordinates , 1984 .

[56]  Matthias Burisch,et al.  Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. , 1984 .

[57]  John P. Campbell,et al.  JOB SATISFACTION: ARE ALL THE PARTS THERE? , 1983 .

[58]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[59]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[60]  Matthias Burisch Construction Strategies for Multiscale Personality Inventories , 1978 .

[61]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations , 1991 .

[62]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. , 1971 .

[63]  J. Horn A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[64]  Morton Deutsch,et al.  The Effect of Motivational Orientation upon Trust and Suspicion , 1960 .

[65]  M. Deutsch Trust and suspicion , 1958 .