Quantifying Tstress controlled constraint by the master curve transition temperature T0

Abstract Specimen size, crack depth and loading conditions may effect the materials fracture toughness. In order to safeguard against these geometry effects, fracture toughness testing standards prescribe the use of highly constrained deep cracked bend specimens having a sufficient size to guarantee conservative fracture toughness values. One of the more advanced testing standards, for brittle fracture, is the master curve standard ASTM E1921-97, which is based on technology developed at VTT Manufacturing Technology. When applied to a structure with low constraint geometry, the standard fracture toughness estimates may lead to strongly over-conservative estimate of structural performance. In some cases, this may lead to unnecessary repairs or even to an early “retirement” of the structure. In the case of brittle fracture, essentially three different methods to quantify constraint have been proposed, J small scale yielding correction, Q-parameter and the Tstress. Here, a relation between the Tstress and the master curve transition temperature T0 is experimentally developed and verified. As a result, a new engineering tool to assess low constraint geometries with respect to brittle fracture has been obtained.

[1]  C. Shih,et al.  Effect of Constraint on Specimen Dimensions Needed to Obtain Structurally Relevant Toughness Measures , 1993 .

[2]  T. Sham.  The determination of the elastic T-term using higher order weight functions , 1991 .

[3]  J. W. Hancock,et al.  J-Dominance of short cracks in tension and bending , 1991 .

[4]  Mg Dawes,et al.  Fracture Mechanics Tests on Welded Joints , 1988 .

[5]  Mg Dawes,et al.  Elastic-Plastic Fracture Toughness Based on the COD and J -Contour Integral Concepts , 1979 .

[6]  Gao,et al.  A Weibull stress model to predict cleavage fracture in plates containing surface cracks , 1999 .

[7]  Jdg Sumpter,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the T Stress Approach , 1993 .

[8]  A. J. Carlsson,et al.  Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials , 1973 .

[9]  J. Sumpter.  The effect of notch depth and orientation on the fracture toughness of multi-pass weldments , 1982 .

[10]  Jdg Sumpter.  Prediction of Critical Crack Size in Plastically Strained Welded Panels , 1988 .

[11]  K. Ravi-Chandar,et al.  Evaluation of elastic T-stress by the stress difference method , 1999 .

[12]  J. Hancock,et al.  Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack-Tip Fields , 1991 .

[13]  Andrew H. Sherry,et al.  COMPENDIUM OF T‐STRESS SOLUTIONS FOR TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONAL CRACKED GEOMETRIES , 1995 .

[14]  P. Leevers,et al.  Inherent stress biaxiality in various fracture specimen geometries , 1982 .

[15]  B. Timofeev,et al.  Brittle fracture toughness—Experimental estimation of RPV materials and their welds containing shallow cracks , 1994 .

[16]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  Specimen Size Requirements for Fracture Toughness Testing in the Transition Region , 1991 .

[17]  A. Kfouri.  Some evaluations of the elastic T-term using Eshelby's method , 1986 .

[18]  J. Willis,et al.  The influence of crack size on the ductile-brittle transition , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[19]  Robert H. Dodds,et al.  A framework to correlate a/W ratio effects on elastic-plastic fracture toughness (Jc) , 1991 .

[20]  C. Shih,et al.  Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—I. Structure of fields , 1991 .

[21]  C. Shih,et al.  Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—II. Fracture applications , 1992 .