A Randomized Trial Comparing Colloid Preload to Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery

BACKGROUND: Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is common. Previous studies have demonstrated that a crystalloid fluid “coload” (rapid administration of a fluid bolus starting at the time of intrathecal injection) is superior to the conventional crystalloid preload (fluid administered before the intrathecal injection) for preventing hypotension. Colloid preload provides a sustained increase in central blood volume. We hypothesized that, in contrast to crystalloid, a colloid preload may be more effective than colloid coload for reducing the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. METHODS: In this double-blind study, 178 patients were randomly assigned to receive a preload of 500 mL of hydroxyethyl starch over a period of 15–20 min before initiation of spinal anesthesia (n = 90) or an identical fluid bolus of hydroxyethyl starch starting at the time of identification of cerebrospinal fluid (n = 88). Vasopressors (ephedrine or phenylephrine) were administered if systolic arterial blood pressure decreased less than 80% of the baseline pressure and <100 mm Hg, or with smaller decreases in blood pressure if accompanied by nausea, vomiting, or dizziness. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension (defined as the administration of at least one dose of vasopressor). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of hypotension (68% in preload group and 75% in coload group, 95% confidence interval of difference −6%–20%; P = 0.28), doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine, and number of vasopressor unit doses. The incidence of severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg) was 16% in the preload group and 22% in the coload group (P = 0.30). There were no differences in the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting, or neonatal outcome between the groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension in women who received colloid administration before the initiation of spinal anesthesia compared with at the time of initiation of anesthesia. Both modalities are inefficient as single interventions to prevent hypotension.

[1]  A. Sia,et al.  Colloid Preload Versus Coload for Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effects on Maternal Cardiac Output , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  S. Saito,et al.  Comparison of effects of rapid colloid loading before and after spinal anesthesia on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in cesarean section , 2007, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[3]  D. Chestnut Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: An Effective Technique Using Combination Phenylephrine Infusion and Crystalloid CohydrationKee WDN, Khaw KS, Ng FF (Chinese Univ of Hong Kong) Anesthesiology 103:744–750, 2005§ , 2006 .

[4]  Kim S. Khaw,et al.  Prevention of Hypotension during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: An Effective Technique Using Combination Phenylephrine Infusion and Crystalloid Cohydration , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[5]  R. Dyer,et al.  Crystalloid Preload versus Rapid Crystalloid Administration after Induction of Spinal Anaesthesia (Coload) for Elective Caesarean Section , 2004, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[6]  M. Dresner,et al.  Aortocaval Compression in Pregnancy: The Effect of Changing the Degree and Direction of Lateral Tilt on Maternal Cardiac Output , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  L. Bautista,et al.  The Timing of Intravenous Crystalloid Administration and Incidence of Cardiovascular Side Effects During Spinal Anesthesia: The Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  W. N. Ngan Kee,et al.  Metaraminol Infusion for Maintenance of Arterial Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effect of a Crystalloid Bolus , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  S. Halpern,et al.  The Effects of an Increase of Central Blood Volume Before Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Qualitative Systematic Review , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  M. Kamenik,et al.  The Effects of Lactated Ringer’s Solution Infusion on Cardiac Output Changes After Spinal Anesthesia , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  T. Mashimo,et al.  Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[12]  I. Russell,et al.  Volume preload: lack of effect in the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. , 1998, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[13]  D. N. Gow,et al.  The caesarean section , 1996, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  D. Thomas,et al.  Randomized Trial of Bolus Phenylephrine or Ephedrine for Maintenance of Arterial Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section , 1996 .

[15]  M. Vercauteren,et al.  Hydroxyethylstarch compared with modified gelatin as volume preload before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. , 1996, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  A. Pouta,et al.  Effect of intravenous fluid preload on vasoactive peptide secretion during Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia , 1996, Anaesthesia.

[17]  R J Boys,et al.  Randomized trial of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for maintenance of arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. , 1996, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  S. Alahuhta,et al.  Effect of crystalloid and colloid preloading on uteroplacental and maternal haemodynamic state during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  A. Rubenstein,et al.  Prevention of Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Six Percent Hetastarch Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[20]  C. Rout,et al.  Volume preloading, spinal hypotension and caesarean section. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  R. Jackson,et al.  Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[22]  A. Namiki Handbook of Spinal Anesthesia and Analgesia , 1995 .

[23]  P. Morgan The role of vasopressors in the management of hypotension induced by spinal and epidural anaesthesia , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[24]  M. Laxenaire,et al.  Réactions anaphylactoïdes aux substituts colloïdaux du plasma : incidence, facteurs de risque, mécanismes. Enquête prospective multicentrique française , 1994 .

[25]  C. Charpentier,et al.  [Anaphylactoid reactions to colloid plasma substitutes: incidence, risk factors, mechanisms. A French multicenter prospective study]. , 1994, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[26]  C. Rout,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Role of Crystalloid Preload in the Prevention of Hypotension Associated with Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section , 1993, Anesthesiology.

[27]  P. Brownridge Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[28]  J. Whitwam,et al.  Aortic compression by the uterus: identification with the Finapres digital arterial pressure instrument , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  R. Boys,et al.  Changes in cardiac output during epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section , 1989, Anaesthesia.

[30]  D. Campbell,et al.  Lung water during the puerperium , 1987, Anaesthesia.