Dynamics of Friendship Reciprocity Among Professional Adults

Friendship is generally a reciprocal relation, yet many enduring ties are not symmetrical. Sometimes, only one member of a dyad considers the other a friend, or may see their relation as a close friendship while the other does not. Existing theories imply that personal and social attributes may influence the likelihood of reciprocity in friendship. In this longitudinal study, we found that demographic and educational attributes had little effect, but relative gregariousness and popularity consistently influenced development and persistence of unequally reciprocated friendships in 2 cohorts of executive MBA students. Additionally, higher gatekeeping power predicted greater tendency to befriend members of different age categories. Although gatekeeping power correlated directly with unequal reciprocity, the effect was mediated by gregariousness and popularity.

[1]  D. Krackhardt Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[2]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Informal contacts and performance in innovation teams , 2005 .

[3]  Bat Batjargal,et al.  Special Issue on Corporate Transformation in the People's Republic of China: Entrepreneurs' Access to Private Equity in China: The Role of Social Capital , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[4]  M. Hallinan,et al.  The Effects of Individual and Structural Characteristics on Intransitivity in Social Networks , 1988 .

[5]  De Soto Cb,et al.  Learning a social structure. , 1960 .

[6]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups , 1998 .

[7]  J. Wiseman,et al.  Friendship: Bonds and Binds in a Voluntary Relationship , 1986 .

[8]  J. Sterling Livingston,et al.  Pygmalion in Management , 2009 .

[9]  David R. Gibson Taking Turns and Talking Ties: Networks and Conversational Interaction1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Kathleen M. Carley Communication Technologies and their Effect on Cultural Homogeneity, Consensus, and the Diffusion of New Ideas , 1995 .

[11]  Phyllis Tharenou,et al.  Women’s Career Advancement , 2001 .

[12]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  The meaning of social interactions in the transition from acquaintanceship to friendship. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Evelien P. H. Zeggelink EVOLVING FRIENDSHIP NETWORKS - AN INDIVIDUAL-ORIENTED APPROACH IMPLEMENTING SIMILARITY , 1995 .

[14]  P. Ingram,et al.  Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Strategic Context Of External Network Ties: Examining The Impact Of Director Appointments On Board Involvement In Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[16]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[17]  A. Newcomb,et al.  Mutuality in boys' friendship relations. , 1982 .

[18]  P. C. Notaro,et al.  Stability and Change in Internal Working Models of Friendship: Associations with Multiple Domains of Urban Adolescent Functioning , 2002 .

[19]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[20]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Scale-free networks , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[21]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[22]  D. McNatt,et al.  Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: a meta-analysis of the result. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  W. Furman Working Models of Friendships , 2001 .

[24]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[25]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Racial Homophily and Its Persistence in Newcomers' Social Networks , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Positive Feelings in Friendship: Does Imbalance in the Relationship Matter? , 2003 .

[27]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Social Networks and Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties , 1998 .

[28]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: a social network perspective. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Judith Maas,et al.  Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in Your Workplace , 2000 .

[30]  L. Freeman Filling in the Blanks: A Theory of Cognitive Categories and the Structure of Social Affiliation , 1992 .

[31]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship , 1996 .

[32]  Thomas W. Dougherty,et al.  Correlates of Networking Behavior for Managerial and Professional Employees , 2001 .

[33]  G. H. Cheng,et al.  A Comparison of Offline and Online Friendship Qualities at Different Stages of Relationship Development , 2004 .

[34]  Isabelle Bouty Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[35]  J. Lincoln,et al.  Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relational Networks , 1979 .

[36]  Deborah E. Gibbons,et al.  Friendship and Advice Networks in the Context of Changing Professional Values , 2004 .

[37]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Social Capital as Social Mechanisms and Collective Assets : The Example of Status Auctions Among Colleagues , 2001 .

[38]  Miriam Erez,et al.  The transplanted executive , 1997 .

[39]  P. Olk,et al.  Individual and structural origins of friendship and social position among professionals. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  David Krackardt,et al.  QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness , 1987 .

[41]  Michael A. Gold,et al.  Pygmalion in work organizations: a meta-analysis , 2000 .

[42]  H. Ibarra Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[43]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Network Conditions for Organizational Change , 2003 .

[44]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Popularity as an Affordance for Friendship: The Link Between Group and Dyadic Experience* , 1996 .

[45]  L. Eby The Boundaryless Career Experiences of Mobile Spouses in Dual-Earner Marriages , 2001 .

[46]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[47]  C. D. De Soto,et al.  Learning a social structure. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[48]  Dov Eden,et al.  Pygmalion without interpersonal contrast effects: Whole groups gain from raising manager expectations. , 1990 .

[49]  B. Erickson,et al.  Corporate Social Capital and Liability , 2002 .

[50]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. , 1993 .

[51]  M. Hallinan The process of friendship formation , 1978 .

[52]  Robert R. Bell,et al.  Worlds of friendship , 1981 .

[53]  E. Morrison,et al.  NEWCOMERS' RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK TIES DURING SOCIALIZATION , 2002 .

[54]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Problems with the pygmalion effect and some proposed solutions , 2000 .

[55]  L. Bond,et al.  Conceptions of Conflict in Close Friendships and Ways of Knowing among Young College Women: A Developmental Framework , 2000 .

[56]  S. Feld Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.