A computational framework for polyconvex large strain elasticity for geometrically exact beam theory

In this paper, a new computational framework is presented for the analysis of nonlinear beam finite elements subjected to large strains. Specifically, the methodology recently introduced in Bonet et al. (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng  283:1061–1094, 2015) in the context of three dimensional polyconvex elasticity is extended to the geometrically exact beam model of Simo (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 49:55–70, 1985), the starting point of so many other finite element beam type formulations. This new variational framework can be viewed as a continuum degenerate formulation which, moreover, is enhanced by three key novelties. First, in order to facilitate the implementation of the sophisticated polyconvex constitutive laws particularly associated with beams undergoing large strains, a novel tensor cross product algebra by Bonet et al. (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng  283:1061–1094, 2015) is adopted, leading to an elegant and physically meaningful representation of an otherwise complex computational framework. Second, the paper shows how the novel algebra facilitates the re-expression of any invariant of the deformation gradient, its cofactor and its determinant in terms of the classical beam strain measures. The latter being very useful whenever a classical beam implementation is preferred. This is particularised for the case of a Mooney–Rivlin model although the technique can be straightforwardly generalised to other more complex isotropic and anisotropic polyconvex models. Third, the connection between the two most accepted restrictions for the definition of constitutive models in three dimensional elasticity and beams is shown, bridging the gap between the continuum and its degenerate beam description. This is carried out via a novel insightful representation of the tangent operator.

[1]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Director‐based beam finite elements relying on the geometrically exact beam theory formulated in skew coordinates , 2014 .

[2]  Rogelio Ortigosa,et al.  A computational framework for polyconvex large strain elasticity for geometrically exact beam theory , 2015, Computational Mechanics.

[3]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  P. Neff,et al.  Invariant formulation of hyperelastic transverse isotropy based on polyconvex free energy functions , 2003 .

[5]  Peter Betsch,et al.  On the consistent formulation of torques in a rotationless framework for multibody dynamics , 2013 .

[6]  J. Stuelpnagel On the Parametrization of the Three-Dimensional Rotation Group , 1964 .

[7]  P. Betsch,et al.  Frame‐indifferent beam finite elements based upon the geometrically exact beam theory , 2002 .

[8]  Andrew M. Stuart,et al.  A First Course in Continuum Mechanics: Bibliography , 2008 .

[9]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  A new Mixed Finite Element based on Different Approximations of the Minors of Deformation Tensors , 2011 .

[10]  Ignacio Romero,et al.  An objective finite element approximation of the kinematics of geometrically exact rods and its use in the formulation of an energy–momentum conserving scheme in dynamics , 2002 .

[11]  T. R. Hughes,et al.  Mathematical foundations of elasticity , 1982 .

[12]  P. Neff,et al.  Anisotropic polyconvex energies on the basis of crystallographic motivated structural tensors , 2008 .

[13]  F. Gruttmann,et al.  A geometrical nonlinear eccentric 3D-beam element with arbitrary cross-sections , 1998 .

[14]  Michael Renardy Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity (Stuart S. Antman) , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[15]  B. Dacorogna Direct methods in the calculus of variations , 1989 .

[16]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  Geometrically exact 3D beam theory: implementation of a strain-invariant finite element for statics and dynamics , 1999 .

[17]  P. Ciarlet,et al.  Mathematical elasticity, volume I: Three-dimensional elasticity , 1989 .

[18]  Jörg Schröder,et al.  Anisotropie polyconvex energies , 2010 .

[19]  P. Neff,et al.  A variational approach for materially stable anisotropic hyperelasticity , 2005 .

[20]  Trevor Coward,et al.  Finite element superplastic forming (FE‐SPF) of patient‐specific maxillofacial prostheses , 2010 .

[21]  Jörg Schröder,et al.  Poly-, quasi- and rank-one convexity in applied mechanics , 2010 .

[22]  F. Auricchio,et al.  On the geometrically exact beam model: A consistent, effective and simple derivation from three-dimensional finite-elasticity , 2008 .

[23]  P. Ciarlet,et al.  Existence theorems in intrinsic nonlinear elasticity , 2010 .

[24]  Daniel Balzani,et al.  Analysis of thin shells using anisotropic polyconvex energy densities , 2008 .

[25]  Kewei Zhang A construction of quasiconvex functions with linear growth at infinity , 1992 .

[26]  Anisotropic Materials which Can be Modeled by Polyconvex Strain Energy Functions , 2006 .

[27]  J. Ball Some Open Problems in Elasticity , 2002 .

[28]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[29]  Antonio J. Gil,et al.  A computational framework for the analysis of linear piezoelectric beams using hp-FEM , 2015 .

[30]  Reint Boer,et al.  Vektor- und Tensorrechnung für Ingenieure , 1982 .

[31]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis , 1997 .

[32]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I , 1985 .

[33]  Rogelio Ortigosa,et al.  On a tensor cross product based formulation of large strain solid mechanics , 2016 .

[34]  P. Neff,et al.  Polyconvex Energies for Trigonal, Tetragonal and Cubic Symmetry Groups , 2010 .

[35]  Antonio J. Gil,et al.  Simulating superplastic forming , 2006 .

[36]  Rogelio Ortigosa,et al.  A first order hyperbolic framework for large strain computational solid dynamics. Part I: Total Lagrangian isothermal elasticity , 2015 .

[37]  Peter Betsch,et al.  On the use of geometrically exact shells in a conserving framework for flexible multibody dynamics , 2009 .

[38]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  A stability study of some mixed finite elements for large deformation elasticity problems , 2005 .

[39]  J. Ball Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity , 1976 .

[40]  A. Ibrahimbegovic,et al.  Computational aspects of vector-like parametrization of three-dimensional finite rotations , 1995 .

[41]  Simon R. Eugster,et al.  On the Foundations of Continuum Mechanics and its Application to Beam Theories , 2014 .

[42]  Gordan Jelenić,et al.  A kinematically exact space finite strain beam model - finite element formulation by generalized virtual work principle , 1995 .

[43]  J. Ball,et al.  W1,p-quasiconvexity and variational problems for multiple integrals , 1984 .