Wie reliabel sind Informationen aus der 3D-Ganganalyse?
暂无分享,去创建一个
AIM The aim of the present study was to collect preliminary data to determine the test-retest reliability in healthy subjects using 3-dimensional computerised gait analysis. METHOD Ten healthy subjects (6 females, 4 males) were tested using a 3-dimensional computerized gait analysis system (VICON 512, Oxford Metrics). There were two trials within a 2-hour period in which kinetic, kinematic and time-distance data were collected. Markers were removed after the first trial and reapplied for the second trial and Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS The correlation coefficients were all positive and high for time-distance (r = 0.86-0.99), sagittal plane kinematics (r = 0.86-0.98) and power (r = 0.90-0.98) parameters, indicating excellent reliability of these measures. Correlation coefficients for frontal and transverse plane kinematics were lower (r = 0.59-0.89). The lowest correlation coefficient values were obtained for transverse plane measures at the hip joint indicating poor reliability of this measure in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION The results suggest excellent test-retest reliability using 3-dimensional computerized gait analysis, especially in the sagittal plane. Therefore this method is a very valuable tool in the analysis as well as in the outcome evaluation of conservative and operative procedures in movement disorders