Major factors affecting cross-city R&D collaborations in China: evidence from cross-sectional co-patent data between 224 cities

Scientific research activities cluster in cities or towns. Modern cities can play a crucial role in the national or regional innovation system. Strengthening R&D collaboration between cities can contribute to perfectly integrating various regional innovation systems. Using the cross-sectional co-patent data of the Chinese Patent Database as a proxy for R&D collaboration, this paper investigates the spatial patterns of R&D collaborations between 224 Chinese cities and the major factors that affect cross-city R&D collaborations in China. A spatial interaction model was used to examine how spatial, economic, technological and political factors affect cross-city R&D collaborations. The degree of centrality shows that cross-city collaborative R&D activities mainly occur in favored regions, advanced municipalities and coastal regions. The mean collaboration intensity for intra-provincial cross-city collaborations is 4.74; however, for inter-provincial collaborations, it is 0.69. The econometric findings reveal that spatial, economic, technological and political bias factors do yield significant influences on the frequency of cross-city R&D collaboration. Specifically, as evidenced by the model coefficient, it is more likely that R&D collaborations occur among cities that are connected by high-speed railways.

[1]  S. Sassen,et al.  The Global City , 2011 .

[2]  J. Guzmán Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[3]  Xiaobo Zhang,et al.  Spatial Inequality in Education and Health Care in China , 2003 .

[4]  S. Sassen The Global City , 1992 .

[5]  Xu Jian-hua,et al.  Spatial and temporal scale analysis on the regional economic disparities in China , 2005 .

[6]  Wei Hong Decline of the center: The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004 , 2008 .

[7]  Koen Jonkers,et al.  Mobility, Migration and the Chinese Scientific Research System , 2010 .

[8]  Ingo Liefner,et al.  Structural Holes and New Dimensions of Distance: The Spatial Configuration of the Scientific Knowledge Network of China's Optical Technology Sector , 2011 .

[9]  T. Wang,et al.  Measuring regional science networks in China: a comparison of international and domestic bibliographic data sources , 2011, Scientometrics.

[10]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[11]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  China’s bullet trains facilitate market integration and mitigate the cost of megacity growth , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Radhamany Sooryamoorthy,et al.  Can the centre–periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany , 2010, Scientometrics.

[13]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[14]  Ling Zhu,et al.  Major factors affecting China's inter-regional research collaboration: Regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity , 2002, Scientometrics.

[15]  M. Barber,et al.  Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme , 2010, 1004.3685.

[16]  Yan Wang,et al.  Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship , 2005, Scientometrics.

[17]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class , 2002 .

[18]  Jungwon Yoon,et al.  Exploring regional innovation capacities of PR China: toward the study of knowledge divide , 2011 .

[19]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[20]  Manuel Acosta,et al.  Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: the role of economic distance , 2011, Scientometrics.

[21]  J. Hoekman,et al.  The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe , 2009 .

[22]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Mapping collaborative knowledge production in China using patent co-inventorships , 2011, Scientometrics.

[23]  J. Sylvan Katz,et al.  Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration , 1994, Scientometrics.

[24]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers across Europe. Evidence from a Poisson Spatial Interaction Model with Spatial Effects , 2015 .

[25]  Thomas Schøtt,et al.  Ties between Center and Periphery in the Scientific World-System: Accumulation of Rewards, Dominance and Self-Reliance in the Center , 1998 .

[26]  Hai-long Ma,et al.  The Effect of Geographical Proximity on Scientific Cooperation among Chinese Cities from 1990 to 2010 , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  Joseph M. Hilbe,et al.  Negative Binomial Regression: Overdispersion , 2011 .

[28]  J. Hilbe Negative Binomial Regression: Preface , 2007 .

[29]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers between High-Technology Firms in Europe - Evidence from a Spatial Interaction Modelling Perspective , 2006 .

[31]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Universities/Research Institutes and Regional Innovation Systems: The Cases of Beijing and Shenzhen , 2007 .

[32]  Thomas Scherngell,et al.  Collaborative Knowledge Production in China: Regional Evidence from a Gravity Model Approach , 2011 .