The Multiple-Update-Infill Sampling Method Using Minimum Energy Design for Sequential Surrogate Modeling

Computer experiments are widely used to evaluate the performance and reliability of engineering systems with the lowest possible time and cost. Sometimes, a high-fidelity model is required to ensure predictive accuracy; this becomes computationally intensive when many computational analyses are required (for example, inverse analysis or uncertainty analysis). In this context, a surrogate model can play a valuable role in addressing computational issues. Surrogate models are fast approximations of high-fidelity models. One efficient way for surrogate modeling is the sequential sampling (SS) method. The SS method sequentially adds samples to refine the surrogate model. This paper proposes a multiple-update-infill sampling method using a minimum energy design to improve the global quality of the surrogate model. The minimum energy design was recently developed for global optimization to find multiple optima. The proposed method was evaluated with other multiple-update-infill sampling methods in terms of convergence, accuracy, sampling efficiency, and computational cost.

[1]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models , 2016, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[2]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method , 2010 .

[3]  D. Krige.  A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, by D.G. Krige, published in the Journal, December 1951 : introduction by the author , 1951 .

[4]  Robert B. Gramacy,et al.  Adaptive Design and Analysis of Supercomputer Experiments , 2008, Technometrics.

[5]  Huajiang Ouyang,et al.  A Kriging Model Based Finite Element Model Updating Method for Damage Detection , 2017 .

[6]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Sequential surrogate modeling for efficient finite element model updating , 2016 .

[7]  Tirthankar Dasgupta,et al.  Sequential Exploration of Complex Surfaces Using Minimum Energy Designs , 2015, Technometrics.

[8]  Kenny Q. Ye.  Orthogonal Column Latin Hypercubes and Their Application in Computer Experiments , 1998 .

[9]  Wei Chen,et al.  A non‐stationary covariance‐based Kriging method for metamodelling in engineering design , 2007 .

[10]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Global versus local search in constrained optimization of computer models , 1998 .

[11]  V. Roshan Joseph,et al.  Space-filling designs for computer experiments: A review , 2016 .

[12]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Uniform Design: Theory and Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[13]  Bruce E. Stuckman,et al.  A global search method for optimizing nonlinear systems , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[15]  D Deschrijver,et al.  Adaptive Sampling Algorithm for Macromodeling of Parameterized $S$ -Parameter Responses , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[16]  James M. Parr,et al.  Infill sampling criteria for surrogate-based optimization with constraint handling , 2012 .

[17]  Haitao Liu,et al.  An adaptive sampling approach for Kriging metamodeling by maximizing expected prediction error , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[18]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Two-Stage Sensitivity-Based Group Screening in Computer Experiments , 2012, Technometrics.

[19]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation , 2010, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput..

[20]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Exploratory designs for computational experiments , 1995 .

[21]  Holger Dette,et al.  Generalized Latin Hypercube Design for Computer Experiments , 2010, Technometrics.

[22]  Shiyu Zhou,et al.  A Simple Approach to Emulation for Computer Models With Qualitative and Quantitative Factors , 2011, Technometrics.

[23]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Self-adaptive sampling for sequential surrogate modeling of time-consuming finite element analysis , 2016 .

[24]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .

[25]  Wei Gong,et al.  An evaluation of adaptive surrogate modeling based optimization with two benchmark problems , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  Byeng D. Youn,et al.  A framework of model validation and virtual product qualification with limited experimental data based on statistical inference , 2015 .

[27]  Hans-Martin Gutmann,et al.  A Radial Basis Function Method for Global Optimization , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[28]  Ying Ma,et al.  An Adaptive Bayesian Sequential Sampling Approach for Global Metamodeling , 2016 .