What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments

This study investigates what pupils aged 10–12 can learn from working with robots, assuming that understanding robotics is a sign of technological literacy. We conducted cognitive and conceptual analysis to develop a frame of reference for determining pupils’ understanding of robotics. Four perspectives were distinguished with increasing sophistication; “psychological”, “technological”, “function”, and “controlled system”. Using Lego® Mindstorms® NXT robots, as an example of a Direct Manipulation Environment, we developed and conducted a lesson plan to investigate pupils’ reasoning patterns. There is ample evidence that pupils have little difficulty in understanding that robots are man-made technological and functional artifacts. Pupils’ understanding of the controlled system concept, more specifically the complex sense-reason-act loop that is characteristic of robotics, can be fostered by means of problem solving tasks. The results are discussed with respect to pupils’ developing technological literacy and the possibilities for teaching and learning in primary education.

[1]  W. Dugger.  Standards for Technological Literacy. Content for the Study of Technology. , 2000 .

[2]  Derek Hodson,et al.  In search of a meaningful relationship: an exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education , 1992 .

[3]  Edgar W. Jenkins,et al.  Scientific Literacy and School Science Education. , 1990 .

[4]  Marc J. de Vries,et al.  Technological knowledge and artifacts : an analytical view , 2006 .

[5]  David Mioduser,et al.  Does it “want” or “was it programmed to...”? Kindergarten children’s explanations of an autonomous robot’s adaptive functioning , 2008 .

[6]  David Mioduser,et al.  Students' perceptions and designs of simple control systems , 1996 .

[7]  Judy Moreland,et al.  Enhancing Practicing Primary School Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Technology , 2004 .

[8]  Michiel van Eijck.  Scientific Literacy: Past Research, Present Conceptions, and Future Developments , 2009 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[10]  V. Braitenberg.  Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[11]  John R Dakers,et al.  Defining technological literacy : towards an epistemological framework , 2006 .

[12]  Scott D. Johnson.  Learning Technological Concepts and Developing Intellectual Skills , 1997 .

[13]  L. Steffe,et al.  The Constructivist Researcher as Teacher and Model Builder , 1983 .

[14]  Namin Shin,et al.  Learning about, from, and with Robots: Students' Perspectives , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[15]  David Mioduser,et al.  Episodes to scripts to rules: concrete-abstractions in kindergarten children’s explanations of a robot’s behavior , 2009 .

[16]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  Robot Diaries: Broadening Participation in the Computer Science Pipeline through Social Technical Exploration , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Using AI to Motivate Greater Participation in Computer Science.

[17]  R. Alexander.  Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk , 2008 .

[18]  Greg Pearson,et al.  Technically speaking : why all Americans need to know more about technology , 2002 .

[19]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[20]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  Using robotic technology as a constructionist mindtool in knowledge construction , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[21]  Florence R. Sullivan.  Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding , 2008 .

[22]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Modeling with Technology: Mindtools for Conceptual Change , 2005 .

[23]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[24]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving , 2009 .

[25]  Greg Pearson,et al.  Tech tally : approaches to assessing technological literacy , 2006 .

[26]  Karen F. Zuga.  Improving Technology Education Research on Cognition , 2004 .

[27]  Lou Slangen,et al.  A case study about supporting the development of thinking by means of ICT and concretisation tools , 2008 .