Common (and multiple) neural substrates for static and dynamic motion after-effects: A rTMS investigation

INTRODUCTION Prolonged exposure to directional motion (adaptation) biases the perceived direction of subsequently presented test stimuli towards the opposite direction with respect to that of adaptation (i.e., motion after-effect; MAE). Different neural populations seem to be involved in the generation of the MAE, depending on the spatiotemporal characteristics of both adapting and test stimuli. Although the tuning mechanisms of the neural populations involved in the MAE have been psychophysically identified, the specific loci along the motion processing hierarchy where the different types of MAE take place is still debated. METHOD In this study, by using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered during the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) between adapting and test patterns, we investigated the cortical locus of processing of static MAE (sMAE) and dynamic MAE (dMAE). RESULTS Results showed that rTMS over V2/V3 or V5/MT decreased the perceived duration of both sMAE and dMAE, although rTMS over V2/V3 decreased mainly the perceived duration of sMAE. CONCLUSIONS sMAE and dMAE rely on the same cortical structures present at intermediate and low-levels of motion processing, although low-level visual areas (e.g., V2/V3) show a prevalence of neurons responsible for sMAE.

[1]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Independent Aftereffects of Attention and Motion , 2000, Neuron.

[2]  Z. Cattaneo,et al.  Investigating visual motion perception using the transcranial magnetic stimulation-adaptation paradigm , 2008, Neuroreport.

[3]  Lucia M. Vaina,et al.  The role of human extra-striate visual areas V5/MT and V2/V3 in the perception of the direction of global motion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Fan Wu,et al.  Robust object-based encoding in visual working memory. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[5]  S. Nishida,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing , 1995, Vision Research.

[6]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Looking ahead: the perceived direction of gaze shifts before the eyes move. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[7]  Simo Vanni,et al.  Neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation suggests that area V2 is necessary for visual awareness , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Z. Dienes Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  The fastest (and simplest), the earliest: The locus of processing of rapid forms of motion aftereffect , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area MT/V5 disrupts perception and storage of the motion aftereffect , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  G. Campana,et al.  Separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order patterns revealed by rapid forms of visual motion priming and motion aftereffect. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[12]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: a test of perceptual memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Kazushi Maruya,et al.  Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[14]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization , 2005, Vision Research.

[15]  T. Ledgeway Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli , 1994, Vision Research.

[16]  S. Nishida,et al.  Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test , 1994, Vision Research.

[17]  A. Metha,et al.  Enhanced motion aftereffect for complex motions , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  M. Aickin,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[20]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Occipital Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Has an Activity-Dependent Suppressive Effect , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  H. Müller-Gärtner,et al.  The motion aftereffect: more than area V5/MT? Evidence from 15O-butanol PET studies , 2001, Brain Research.

[23]  Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti,et al.  Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[24]  G. Mather,et al.  The motion aftereffect reloaded , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Aftereffect of High-Speed Motion , 1998, Perception.

[26]  Andrea Pavan,et al.  The role of stationary and dynamic test patterns in rapid forms of motion after-effect. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[27]  Talis Bachmann,et al.  Spatially localized motion aftereffect disappears faster from awareness when selectively attended to according to its direction , 2011, Vision Research.

[28]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[29]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  The role of high-level visual areas in short- and longer-lasting forms of neural plasticity , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Hiroshi Ashida,et al.  A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[32]  R. F. Hess,et al.  Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation , 1992, Vision Research.

[33]  K. Ziemons,et al.  The Network of Brain Areas Involved in the Motion Aftereffect , 2000, NeuroImage.

[34]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[35]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Frequency Tuning of the Flicker Motion Aftereffect , 1996, Vision Research.