Cephalometric Outcomes of Orthognathic Surgery in Hemifacial Microsomia

Abstract Hemifacial microsomia is a hypoplastic disorder of the first and second branchial arches that significantly impacts on the development of the jaws, leading to malocclusion and facial asymmetry. There is little in the literature regarding the application of orthodontic/orthognathic approaches to the correction of these deformities and the stability of the surgical results. To address this, a retrospective chart review of 10 patients with complete orthodontic records and greater than 1 year of follow-up was performed. Posteroanterior cephalograms were assessed by modified Grummons analysis to determine mandibular offset (deviation of the chin point from the skeletal midline) and occlusal cant. These measurements were performed at 3 time points (T1: preoperative, T2: immediate postoperative, T3: follow-up) to elucidate the surgical movement (T2–T1), the postoperative relapse (T3–T2), and the net gain movement (T3–T1). Maxillary movements were quantified, and the occlusal cant was expressed as a ratio between vertical heights of the maxilla at the first molar on each side. One sample t test demonstrated statistically significant surgical movement and net gain. Relapse was statistically insignificant. Repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated similar results for chin point position relative to the putative midline. Our results suggest that a combined orthodontic/orthognathic approach at skeletal maturity delivers improved occlusal outcomes in the long term as assessed by chin point deviation and occlusal cant, but secondary surgery rates are higher than those for orthognathic surgery in other patient groups. We advocate limiting surgery to skeletal maturity whenever possible to achieve stable long-term results while limiting morbidity and number of procedures.

[1]  S. Bartlett No evidence for long-term effectiveness of early osteodistraction in hemifacial microsomia. , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Craniomaxillofacial Reconstructive and Corrective Bone Surgery , 2002, Springer New York.

[3]  J. Mulliken,et al.  OMENS-Plus: analysis of craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in hemifacial microsomia. , 1995, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[4]  J. Mulliken,et al.  The O.M.E.N.S. classification of hemifacial microsomia. , 1991, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[5]  I. Munro,et al.  Growth after construction of the temporomandibular joint in children with hemifacial microsomia. , 1989, The Cleft palate journal.

[6]  A. Lin,et al.  Oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia. , 1988, American journal of medical genetics.

[7]  D C Grummons,et al.  A frontal asymmetry analysis. , 1987, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[8]  K. Vargervik,et al.  Factors affecting long-term results in hemifacial microsomia. , 1986, The Cleft palate journal.

[9]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child: a follow-up study. , 1986, The Cleft palate journal.

[10]  A. Lefebvre,et al.  Psychosocial Impact of Craniofacial Deformities Before and after Reconstructive Surgery * , 1982, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[11]  J. Mulliken,et al.  Three-dimensional approach to analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. , 1981, The Cleft palate journal.

[12]  H. Obwegeser Correction of the skeletal anomalies of oto-mandibular dysostosis. , 1974, Journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  P. J. Coccaro,et al.  THE CORRECTIVE TREATMENT OF THE SKELETAL ASYMMETRY IN HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA , 1973, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.