Reynolds number influences in aeronautics

Reynolds number, a measure of the ratio of inertia to viscous forces, is a fundamental similarity parameter for fluid flows and therefore, would be expected to have a major influence in aerodynamics and aeronautics. Reynolds number influences are generally large, but monatomic, for attached laminar (continuum) flow; however, laminar flows are easily separated, inducing even stronger, non-monatomic, Reynolds number sensitivities. Probably the strongest Reynolds number influences occur in connection with transitional flow behavior. Transition can take place over a tremendous Reynolds number range, from the order of 20 x 10(exp 3) for 2-D free shear layers up to the order of 100 x 10(exp 6) for hypersonic boundary layers. This variability in transition behavior is especially important for complex configurations where various vehicle and flow field elements can undergo transition at various Reynolds numbers, causing often surprising changes in aerodynamics characteristics over wide ranges in Reynolds number. This is further compounded by the vast parameterization associated with transition, in that any parameter which influences mean viscous flow development (e.g., pressure gradient, flow curvature, wall temperature, Mach number, sweep, roughness, flow chemistry, shock interactions, etc.), and incident disturbance fields (acoustics, vorticity, particulates, temperature spottiness, even electro static discharges) can alter transition locations to first order. The usual method of dealing with the transition problem is to trip the flow in the generally lower Reynolds number wind tunnel to simulate the flight turbulent behavior. However, this is not wholly satisfactory as it results in incorrectly scaled viscous region thicknesses and cannot be utilized at all for applications such as turbine blades and helicopter rotors, nacelles, leading edge and nose regions, and High Altitude Long Endurance and hypersonic airbreathers where the transitional flow is an innately critical portion of the problem.

[1]  Robert J. McGhee,et al.  A New Multipoint Thin-Film Diagnostic Technique for Fluid Dynamic Studies , 1988 .

[2]  P. Meredith,et al.  Areas for future CFD development as illustrated by transport aircraft applications , 1991 .

[3]  Edward J. Ray.  The NASA Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel , 1988 .

[4]  J. A. Penland,et al.  Advances in Hypersonic Exploration Capability- Wind Tunnel to Flight Reynolds Number , 1971 .

[5]  L. R. Gartrell,et al.  Laser velocimetry technique applied to the Langley 0.3 meter transonic cryogenic tunnel , 1981 .

[6]  R. A. Kilgore,et al.  The application of cryogenics to high Reynolds number testing in wind tunnels. I - Evolution, theory, and advantages , 1984 .

[7]  John W. Edwards,et al.  Current status of computational methods for transonic unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic applications , 1992 .

[8]  D. G. Mabey,et al.  A review of scale effects in unsteady aerodynamics , 1991 .

[9]  J. Barger,et al.  Elements of acoustics , 1998 .

[10]  R. M. Hicks,et al.  Use of grit-type boundary-layer transition trips on wind-tunnel models , 1966 .

[11]  A. D. Vakili,et al.  Wall shear stress measurements using a new transducer , 1986 .

[12]  K. Ahuja,et al.  Control of turbulent boundary layer flows by sound , 1983 .

[13]  William I. Scallion,et al.  Advanced Hypervelocity Aerophysics Facility Workshop , 1989 .

[14]  James N. Moss,et al.  Direct Simulation of Transitional Flow for Hypersonic Reentry Conditions , 1984 .

[15]  Stanley R. Cole.  Exploratory flutter test in a cryogenic wind tunnel , 1985 .

[16]  Dennis M. Bushnell.  Applications and suggested directions of transition research , 1990 .

[17]  Pierce L. Lawing,et al.  Construction of Airfoil Pressure Models Using the Multiple Plate Method , 1988 .

[18]  A. H. Whitehead.  Flow-field and drag characteristics of several boundary-layer tripping elements in hypersonic flow , 1969 .

[19]  C. V. Eckstrom,et al.  Drones for aerodynamic and structural testing /DAST/ - A status report , 1978 .

[20]  V. Vatsa,et al.  Prediction of separated transonic wing flows with a non-equilibrium algebraic model , 1989 .

[21]  D. G. Mabey,et al.  Further buffeting tests in a cryogenic wind tunnel , 1992 .

[22]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Observation of airplane flow fields by natural condensation effects , 1988 .

[23]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Some numerical and physical aspects of unsteady Navier-Stokes computations over airfoils using dynamic meshes , 1988 .

[24]  J. Edwards.  Unsteady aerodynamics - Physical issues and numerical predictions , 1990 .

[25]  D. Arnal,et al.  Leading-Edge Contamination and Relaminarization on a Swept Wing at Incidence , 1990 .

[26]  Daniel W. Banks,et al.  Surface flow visualization of separated flows on the forebody of an F-18 aircraft and wind-tunnel model , 1988 .

[27]  W. H. Reed.  Comparisons of flight measurements with predictions from aeroelastic models in the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel , 1975 .

[28]  A. Powell.  Theory of Vortex Sound , 1964 .

[29]  M. Lighthill.  On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[30]  J. Anderson,et al.  Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics , 2019 .

[31]  J. P. Arrington,et al.  A review of preflight estimates of real-gas effects on space shuttle aerodynamic characteristics , 1983 .

[32]  Luat T. Nguyen,et al.  Impact of emerging technologies on future combat aircraft agility , 1990 .

[33]  Tuncer Cebeci,et al.  An interactive boundary-layer approach to multielement airfoils at high lift , 1992 .

[34]  E. J. Ray.  A review of Reynolds number studies conducted in the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel , 1982 .

[35]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  Computation of three-dimensional turbulent vortical flows on bodies at high incidence , 1991 .

[36]  Ian Proudman,et al.  Boundary Layer Theory (fourth edition). By H. SCHLICHTINO. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960. 647 pp. £6. 8s. , 1962, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[37]  B. J. Griffith.  Comparison of Aerodynamic Data from the Gemini Flights and AEDC-VKF Wind Tunnels , 1967 .

[38]  R. H. Ricketts.  Selected topics in experimental aeroelasticity at the NASA Langley Research Center , 1985 .

[39]  C. J. Schueler,et al.  Radiated aerodynamic noise effects on boundary-layer transition in supersonic and hypersonic wind tunnels. , 1969 .

[40]  Parametric study of grid size, time step and turbulence modeling on Navier-Stokes computations over airfoils , 1988 .

[41]  Clarence P. Young,et al.  Buffet test in the National Transonic Facility , 1992 .

[42]  H. Schlichting.  Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[43]  W. G. Johnson,et al.  A summary of Reynolds number effects on some recent tests in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel , 1986 .

[44]  J. B. Hallissy,et al.  Review of vortex flow flight projects on the F-106B , 1987 .

[45]  J. J. Bertin,et al.  Shuttle orbiter boundary layer transition at flight and wind tunnel conditions , 1983 .

[46]  G. D. Walberg,et al.  A review of aeroassisted orbit transfer , 1982 .

[47]  Robert M. Hall,et al.  Navier-Stokes solutions for vortical flows over a tangent-ogive cylinder , 1990 .

[48]  J. R. Chambers,et al.  Technical evaluation report of AGARD technical meeting on unsteady aerodynamics : fundamentals and applications to aircraft dynamics , 1986 .

[49]  Charles G. Miller,et al.  Wind-tunnel based definition of the AFE aerothermodynamic environment. [Aeroassist Flight Experiment] , 1992 .

[50]  G. C. Greene,et al.  An approximate model of vortex decay in the atmosphere , 1985 .

[51]  W. C. Honaker,et al.  Measurements in the flow field of a cylinder with a laser transit anemometer and a drag rake in the Langley 0.3 m transonic cryogenic tunnel , 1985 .

[52]  R. A. Rozendaal,et al.  F-111 natural laminar flow glove flight test data analysis and boundary layer stability analysis , 1984 .

[54]  Coleman duP. Donaldson,et al.  Vortex Wakes of Conventional Aircraft , 1975 .

[55]  A. H. Whitehead,et al.  Transition fixing for hypersonic flow , 1967 .

[56]  S. B. Jones,et al.  Flow visualization in the Langley 0.3-meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel and preliminary plans for the National Transonic Facility , 1982 .

[57]  D. E. Boylan,et al.  Postflight Apollo command module aerodynamic simulation tests. , 1968 .

[58]  M. Holden,et al.  A review of aerothermal problems associated with hypersonic flight , 1986 .

[59]  Pierce L. Lawing,et al.  Transonic unsteady pressure measurements on a supercritical airfoil at high Reynolds numbers , 1989 .