Overview of Advances in Forensic Radiological Methods of Human Identification

Shortly after the discovery of X-rays in 1895, radiological methods have been widely used to assist in examination of human remains, contributing to the identification and investigative process. In our modern era when the invasive nature of some forensic medical procedures are increasingly at odds with the acceptable norms of society, medical imaging techniques enable the noninvasive examination of remains in a variety of states of decomposition. Recent advances in computer technology have revolutionized medical imaging methods which now employ radioactive materials, sound waves, and magnetic fields in addition to X-ray technology. This chapter reviews the current contribution of postmortem medical imaging methods to forensic skeletal human identification, discussing applications, equipment, and techniques used together with their relative advantages and disadvantages. It discusses current developments within the field and highlights the opportunities and challenges that forensic practitioners face when examining skeletal remains.

[1]  Norman R Goodman,et al.  The efficiency of an X-ray screening system at a mass disaster. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  M. Viner,et al.  Sex determination from the foramen magnum , 2013 .

[3]  Comparative radiographic study of human and animal long bone patterns. , 1987, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  R. Dorion,et al.  The use of Computed Tomography (CT) Scans in the Comparison of Frontal Sinus Configurations , 1992 .

[5]  S. Black,et al.  The Juvenile Skeleton , 2004 .

[6]  C. O'Donnell,et al.  Contribution of postmortem multidetector CT scanning to identification of the deceased in a mass disaster: Experience gained from the 2009 Victorian bushfires. , 2011, Forensic science international.

[7]  W. Mccormick Mineralization of the costal cartilages as an indicator of age: preliminary observations. , 1980, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  B. Brogdon,et al.  Forensic radiology in historical perspective. , 2000, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[9]  P C Goodman,et al.  The new light: discovery and introduction of the X-ray. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  A. Sajantila,et al.  Use of radiology in disaster victim identification: Positional statement of the members of the disaster victim identification working group of the international society of forensic radiology and imaging; May 2013 , 2013 .

[11]  Peter Mygind Leth,et al.  The use of CT scanning in forensic autopsy , 2007, Forensic science, medicine, and pathology.

[12]  P. Hofman,et al.  Use of radiography and fluoroscopy in Disaster Victim Identification. Positional statement of the members of the Disaster Victim Identification working group of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging , 2015 .

[13]  B. Brogdon Radiological Identification of Individual Remains , 1998 .

[14]  William Ledlie Culbert,et al.  IDENTIFICATION BY COMPARISON OF ROENTGENOGRAMS: OF NASAL ACCESSORY SINUSES AND MASTOID PROCESSES , 1927 .

[15]  H. Harcke,et al.  Forensic radiology: response to the Pentagon Attack on September 11, 2001. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  P. Nambiar,et al.  Anatomical variability of the frontal sinuses and their application in forensic identification , 1999, Clinical anatomy.

[17]  P. Levy,et al.  Determination of sex by costal cartilage calcification. , 1970, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[18]  T. Rogers,et al.  Accuracy of sex determination using morphological traits of the human pelvis. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  Radiology in Mass Casualty Situations , 1998 .

[20]  Ewa Pietka,et al.  Skeletal Age Determinations in Children of European and African Descent: Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle Standards , 2001, Pediatric Research.

[21]  Felix S Chew,et al.  Digital Tomosynthesis to Evaluate Fracture Healing: Prospective Comparison With Radiography and CT. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J M Suchey,et al.  Use of the ventral arc in pubic sex determination. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[23]  K. Eley,et al.  "Black bone" MRI: a partial flip angle technique for radiation reduction in craniofacial imaging. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  W. M. Krogman The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[25]  D. E. Newman,et al.  Leg length determination by CT digital radiography. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  H. Rousseau,et al.  Modern Cross-Sectional Imaging in Anthropology , 2010 .

[27]  Joachim Böttcher,et al.  Assessment of skeletal age at the wrist in children with a new ultrasound device , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[28]  G. Gleser,et al.  A re-evaluation of estimation of stature based on measurements of stature taken during life and of long bones after death. , 1958, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  S. Alqahtani,et al.  Brief communication: The London atlas of human tooth development and eruption. , 2010, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  Marc Goldstein,et al.  Skeletal identification using the frontal sinus region: a retrospective study of 39 cases. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[31]  E. Craig Intercondylar shelf angle: a new method to determine race from the distal femur. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.

[32]  Fischman Sl The use of medical and dental radiographs in identification. , 1985 .

[33]  Michael J. Thali,et al.  The rise of forensic and post-mortem radiology—Analysis of the literature between the year 2000 and 2011 , 2013 .

[34]  B. Brogdon Radiological Identification: Anthropological Parameters , 1998 .

[35]  T. Tytle,et al.  The role of radiology in the Oklahoma City bombing. , 1996, Radiology.

[36]  S. Jensen Identification of Human Remains Lacking Skull and Teeth: A Case Report with Some Methodological Considerations , 1991, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[37]  G. Gleser,et al.  Estimation of stature from long bones of American Whites and Negroes. , 1952, American journal of physical anthropology.

[38]  T. Noguchi,et al.  A new application of forensic radiology: identification of deceased from a single clavicle. , 1972, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[39]  Morio Iino,et al.  Use of post-mortem computed tomography in Disaster Victim Identification. Positional statement of the members of the Disaster Victim Identification working group of the International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging ; May 2014 , 2014 .

[40]  Guy N Rutty,et al.  The Role of Mobile Computed Tomography in Mass Fatality Incidents , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[41]  J Hiss,et al.  Identification of human remains: forensic radiology. , 1997, Journal of clinical forensic medicine.

[42]  A. Buchner The identification of human remains. , 1985, International dental journal.

[43]  Hansman Cf Appearance and fusion of ossification centers in the human skeleton. , 1962 .

[44]  J. Hiss,et al.  Radiographic identification of fragmentary human remains from a mass disaster. , 1997, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[45]  James T. Dobbins,et al.  Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[46]  Koshi Sato,et al.  Assessment of Measurement of Children's Bone Age Ultrasonically with Sunlight BonAge , 2005 .

[47]  Y. Kurihara,et al.  Radiologic evidence of sex differences: is the patient a woman or a man? , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[48]  A. Nicol,et al.  Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine , 2003, Emergency Radiology.

[49]  W. Greulich,et al.  Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist , 1999 .

[50]  G. Wagner,et al.  Radiologic evaluation of mass casualty victims: lessons from the Gander, Newfoundland, accident. , 1988, Radiology.

[51]  W. Murphy,et al.  Radiologic identification of unknown human remains. , 1980, Journal of forensic sciences.

[52]  M. A. Clark,et al.  Identification of human remains by comparison of frontal sinus radiographs: a series of four cases. , 1991, Journal of Forensic Sciences.