A novel method for tri-clustering dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) identifies significant schizophrenia effects across multiple states in distinct subgroups of individuals

Background Brain imaging data collected from individuals are highly complex with unique variation; however, such variation is typically ignored in approaches that focus on group averages or even supervised prediction. State-of-the-art methods for analyzing dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) subdivide the entire time course into several (possibly overlapping) connectivity states (i.e., sliding window clusters). Though, such an approach does not factor in the homogeneity of underlying data and may end up with a less meaningful subgrouping of the dataset. Methods Dynamic-N-way tri-clustering (dNTiC) incorporates a homogeneity benchmark to approximate clusters that provide a more apples-to-apples comparison between groups within analogous subsets of time-space and subjects. dNTiC sorts the dFNC states by maximizing similarity across individuals and minimizing variance among the pairs of components within a state. Results Resulting tri-clusters show significant differences between schizophrenia (SZ) and healthy control (HC) in distinct brain regions. Compared to HC, SZ in most tri-clusters show hypoconnectivity (low positive) among subcortical, default mode, cognitive control but hyper-connectivity (high positive) between sensory networks. In tri-cluster 3, HC subjects show significantly stronger connectivity among sensory networks and anticorrelation between subcortical and sensory networks compared to SZ. Results also provide statistically significant difference in reoccurrence time between SZ and HC subjects for two distinct dFNC states. Conclusions Outcomes emphasize the utility of the proposed method for characterizing and leveraging variance within high-dimensional data to enhance the interpretability and sensitivity of measurements in the study of a heterogeneous disorder like schizophrenia and in unconstrained experimental conditions such as resting fMRI.

[1]  J. Clayden Imaging connectivity: MRI and the structural networks of the brain. , 2013, Functional neurology.

[2]  S. Makeig,et al.  Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  S. Lawrie,et al.  Brain abnormality in schizophrenia , 1998, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic functional network connectivity discriminates mild traumatic brain injury through machine learning , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[5]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  The oscillating brain: Complex and reliable , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Yeung Sam Hung,et al.  Task-related functional connectivity dynamics in a block-designed visual experiment , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Classification As a Criterion to Select Model Order For Dynamic Functional Connectivity States in Rest-fMRI Data , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019).

[9]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Task-based dynamic functional connectivity: Recent findings and open questions , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Simone Kühn,et al.  Resting-state brain activity in schizophrenia and major depression: a quantitative meta-analysis. , 2013, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[12]  Jill Harkavy-Friedman,et al.  Resting neural activity distinguishes subgroups of schizophrenia patients , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[13]  Roberto Therón,et al.  Methods to Bicluster Validation and Comparison in Microarray Data , 2007, IDEAL.

[14]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[15]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Functional network connectivity during rest and task conditions: A comparative study , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[17]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  NeuroMark: an adaptive independent component analysis framework for estimating reproducible and comparable fMRI biomarkers among brain disorders , 2019 .

[18]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Replicability of time-varying connectivity patterns in large resting state fMRI samples , 2017, NeuroImage.

[19]  VD Calhoun,et al.  Classification of schizophrenia patients vs healthy controls with dynamic functional network connectivity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  S. Djurovic,et al.  Brain Heterogeneity in Schizophrenia and Its Association With Polygenic Risk. , 2019, JAMA psychiatry.

[21]  S. Kay,et al.  The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. , 1987, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[22]  Tülay Adali,et al.  Comparison of multi‐subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Dongdong Lin,et al.  Identifying dynamic functional connectivity biomarkers using GIG‐ICA: Application to schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic bipolar disorder , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[25]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Classification of schizophrenia and bipolar patients using static and dynamic resting-state fMRI brain connectivity , 2016, NeuroImage.

[27]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  The Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network Data Repository , 2016, NeuroImage.

[28]  Hyo Jong Lee,et al.  N-BiC: A method for multi-component and symptom biclustering of structural MRI data: Application to schizophrenia , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Yanbin Jia,et al.  Abnormal dynamic functional network connectivity in unmedicated bipolar and major depressive disorders based on the triple-network model , 2019, Psychological Medicine.

[30]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[31]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[33]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Higher Dimensional Meta-State Analysis Reveals Reduced Resting fMRI Connectivity Dynamism in Schizophrenia Patients , 2016, PloS one.

[34]  D. Yao,et al.  Altered Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Frontal Lobe Epilepsy , 2018, Brain Topography.

[35]  Yuan Zhou,et al.  Functional disintegration in paranoid schizophrenia using resting-state fMRI , 2007, Schizophrenia Research.

[36]  Junchao Li,et al.  High transition frequencies of dynamic functional connectivity states in the creative brain , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Andreas A Ioannides,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[39]  Fbirn,et al.  A multi-site resting state fMRI study on the amplitude of low frequency fluctuations in schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[40]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Technical Brief: Agreement, the F-Measure, and Reliability in Information Retrieval , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[41]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Modulation of temporally coherent brain networks estimated using ICA at rest and during cognitive tasks , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[42]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Brain covariance selection: better individual functional connectivity models using population prior , 2010, NIPS.

[43]  Theo G. M. van Erp,et al.  A framework for linking resting-state chronnectome/genome features in schizophrenia: A pilot study , 2019, NeuroImage.

[44]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  Chin-Hui Lee,et al.  Evaluation of sliding window correlation performance for characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states , 2016, NeuroImage.

[46]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[47]  P. DeRosse,et al.  Dynamic Functional Connectivity States Reflecting Psychotic-like Experiences. , 2017, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[48]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A classification-based approach to estimate the number of resting fMRI dynamic functional connectivity states , 2020, bioRxiv.

[49]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[51]  A. Belger,et al.  Resting-state thalamic dysconnectivity in schizophrenia and relationships with symptoms , 2018, Psychological Medicine.

[52]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Default mode network activity in schizophrenia studied at resting state using probabilistic ICA , 2012, Schizophrenia Research.

[53]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Characterizing dynamic amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and its relationship with dynamic functional connectivity: An application to schizophrenia , 2017, NeuroImage.

[54]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic changes of spatial functional network connectivity in healthy individuals and schizophrenia patients using independent vector analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[55]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in schizophrenia: A resting state fMRI study , 2010, Schizophrenia Research.

[56]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Functional Brain Networks in Schizophrenia: A Review , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  S. Faraone,et al.  Heterogeneity of Schizophrenia , 1990, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[58]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Interrater and intermethod reliability of default mode network selection , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[59]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[60]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using Static and Dynamic Connectivity Measures , 2016, Front. Neurosci..