The effect of time constraint on anticipation, decision making, and option generation in complex and dynamic environments

Abstract Researchers interested in performance in complex and dynamic situations have focused on how individuals predict their opponent(s) potential courses of action (i.e., during assessment) and generate potential options about how to respond (i.e., during intervention). When generating predictive options, previous research supports the use of cognitive mechanisms that are consistent with long-term working memory (LTWM) theory (Ericsson and Kintsch in Phychol Rev 102(2):211–245, 1995; Ward et al. in J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 7:231–254, 2013). However, when generating options about how to respond, the extant research supports the use of the take-the-first (TTF) heuristic (Johnson and Raab in Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 91:215–229, 2003). While these models provide possible explanations about how options are generated in situ, often under time pressure, few researchers have tested the claims of these models experimentally by explicitly manipulating time pressure. The current research investigates the effect of time constraint on option-generation behavior during the assessment and intervention phases of decision making by employing a modified version of an established option-generation task in soccer. The results provide additional support for the use of LTWM mechanisms during assessment across both time conditions. During the intervention phase, option-generation behavior appeared consistent with TTF, but only in the non-time-constrained condition. Counter to our expectations, the implementation of time constraint resulted in a shift toward the use of LTWM-type mechanisms during the intervention phase. Modifications to the cognitive-process level descriptions of decision making during intervention are proposed, and implications for training during both phases of decision making are discussed.

[1]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[2]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[3]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[4]  Melissa J. Hopwood,et al.  The influence of viewing perspective on decision-making and visual search behaviour in an invasive sport , 2009 .

[5]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[6]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  A. Williams,et al.  Perceptual and Cognitive Skill Development in Soccer: The Multidimensional Nature of Expert Performance , 2003 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[9]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Accelerated Expertise: Training for High Proficiency in a Complex World , 2013 .

[10]  Paul Ward,et al.  Complex Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in a Simulated Task Environment , 2013 .

[11]  G. Klein,et al.  A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. , 1993 .

[12]  Jerad H. Moxley,et al.  The role of intuition and deliberative thinking in experts’ superior tactical decision-making , 2012, Cognition.

[13]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. 1954. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  A. Osman,et al.  Mechanisms of speed–accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[15]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[16]  Caroline E. Zsambok,et al.  Characteristics of Skilled Option Generation in Chess , 1995 .

[17]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[18]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[19]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Roles of Recognition Processes and Look-Ahead Search in Time-Constrained Expert Problem Solving: Evidence From Grand-Master-Level Chess , 1996 .

[20]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[21]  Christopher F. Chabris,et al.  Visualization, pattern recognition, and forward search: effects of playing speed and sight of the position on grandmaster chess errors , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Gary Klein,et al.  Use of a prediction paradigm to evaluate proficient decision making , 1989 .

[23]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[24]  G. Lassiter,et al.  The Relative Contributions of Recognition and Search-Evaluation Processes to High-Level Chess Performance: Comment on Gobet and Simon , 2000, Psychological science.

[25]  Patrick K. Belling,et al.  Investigating constraints on decision making strategies , 2013 .

[26]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Take The First: Option-generation and resulting choices , 2003 .