Parallel non-verbal enumeration is constrained by a set-based limit

Adults can represent approximate numbers of items independently of language. This approximate number system can discriminate and compare entities as varied as dots, sounds, or actions. But can multiple different types of entities be enumerated in parallel and stored as independent numerosities? Subjects who were prevented from verbally counting watched an experimenter hide sequences of objects in two locations. The number of object types, which contrasted in category membership, color, shape, and texture, varied from 1 to 5, and object types were completely temporally intermixed. Subjects were then asked how many objects of each type were in each location. In three experiments, subjects successfully enumerated the objects of each type in each location when 1-3 types were presented, but failed with 4 or 5 types, regardless of the total number of objects seen. Thus, adults can perform simultaneous enumeration of multiple sets that unfold in temporally intermixed fashion, but are limited to 3 such sets at a time. Furthermore, they perform these parallel enumerations in the absence of training or instruction, and can do so for sets of objects that are hidden in distinct locations. The convergence of this 3-set capacity limit with the 3-item capacity limit widely observed in studies of working memory suggests that each enumeration requires a single slot in memory, and that storage in memory is required before enumeration can occur.

[1]  Susan Carey,et al.  What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge , 1999 .

[2]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  The multisensory representation of number in infancy. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  The Representations Underlying Infants' Choice of More: Object Files Versus Analog Magnitudes , 2002, Psychological science.

[5]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[6]  Warren H. Meck,et al.  Abstraction of Temporal Attributes , 1982 .

[7]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[8]  T. Simon,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Origins of Number Knowledge: A "Non-Numerical" Account , 1997 .

[9]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Enumeration Processes in the Primate Parietal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[10]  S. Carey,et al.  On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays , 2005, Cognition.

[11]  D. Yntema,et al.  Remembering the present states of a number of variables. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.

[13]  Soon Chun Siong,et al.  Parametric effects of numerical distance on the intraparietal sulcus during passive viewing of rapid numerosity changes , 2006, Brain Research.

[14]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  D. Yntema,et al.  Response selection in keeping track of several things at once. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[17]  R A MONTY,et al.  KEEPING TRACK OF SEQUENTIAL EVENTS: EFFECTS OF RATE, CATEGORIES, AND TRIAL LENGTH. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[19]  B B Murdock,et al.  Auditory and visual stores in short term memory. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[20]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[21]  A. Streri,et al.  Evidence of amodal representation of small numbers across visuo-tactile modalities in 5-month-old infants , 2006 .

[22]  Lisa Feigenson,et al.  Tracking individuals via object-files: evidence from infants' manual search , 2003 .

[23]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[24]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Auditory-visual intermodal matching of small numerosities in 6-month-old infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[25]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects , 2006, Nature.

[26]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[27]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Enumeration Processes in the Primate Parietal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[28]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[31]  Fei Xu,et al.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations , 2003, Cognition.

[32]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[33]  D. Erlick,et al.  ABSOLUTE JUDGMENTS OF DISCRETE QUANTITIES RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED OVER TIME. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Hilary Barth,et al.  Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[36]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.