reveal the dynamic range and diverse mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptor activation.

Author Contributions D.P.S and R.T.S conceived the project. Pharmacological assessment of the interactions between Nb60 and Nb80 with the β 2AR were designed, performed and analyzed by D.P.S., R.T.S, B.P., S.A., and A.C. Formation, purification, and crystallization of the β 2 AR-Nb60-Carazolol complex was conducted by D.P.S. and A.M. Data collection, refinement, and structural analysis was done by A.M., A.C.K., and A. Masoudi, and W.I.W. NMR spectroscopy was executed by A.M., T.H.K, and supervised by R.S.P. Isothermal titration calorimetry was conducted by A.W.K. Nanobody reagents were provided by E.P. and J.S. Detailed allosteric analysis of radioligand binding data was implemented by T.C. Figures were created by D.P.S., A.M., T.C., L.M.W., R.T.S., and A. Masoudi. Manuscript was written by D.P.S, T.C., R.T.S., L.M.W., A.M., A.K.C, and R.J.L. Overall research was supervised by B.K.K. and R.J.L. Abstract G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activation of downstream signaling effectors such as G proteins and β -arrestins. It is widely appreciated that different agonists can share the same binding pocket but evoke unique receptor conformations leading to a wide range of downstream responses (i.e., ‘efficacy’) 1 . Furthermore, mounting biophysical evidence, primarily using the β -adrenergic receptor ( β 2 AR) as a model system, supports the existence of multiple active and inactive conformational states 2–5 . However, how agonists with varying efficacy modulate these receptor states to initiate cellular responses is not well understood. Here we report stabilization of two distinct β 2 AR conformations using single domain camelid antibodies (nanobodies): a previously described positive allosteric nanobody (Nb80) and a newly identified negative allosteric nanobody (Nb60) 6,7 . We show that Nb60 stabilizes a previously unappreciated low affinity receptor state which corresponds to one of two inactive receptor conformations as delineated by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. We find that the agonist isoproterenol has a 15,000-fold higher affinity for the β 2 AR in the presence of Nb80 compared to Nb60, highlighting the full allosteric range of a GPCR. Assessing the binding of 17 ligands of varying efficacy to the β 2 AR in the absence and presence of Nb60 or Nb80 reveals large ligand-specific effects that can only be explained using an allosteric model which assumes equilibrium amongst at least three receptor states. Agonists generally exert efficacy by stabilizing the active Nb80-stabilized receptor state (R 80 ). In contrast, for a number of partial agonists, both stabilization of R 80 and destabilization of the inactive, Nb60-bound state (R 60 ) contribute to their ability to modulate receptor activation. These data demonstrate that ligands can initiate a wide range of cellular responses by differentially stabilizing

[1]  T. S. Kobilka,et al.  Structural Insights into the Dynamic Process of β2-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling , 2015, Cell.

[2]  S. Rajagopal,et al.  What is biased efficacy? Defining the relationship between intrinsic efficacy and free energy coupling. , 2014, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[3]  Ryan T. Strachan,et al.  Divergent Transducer-specific Molecular Efficacies Generate Biased Agonism at a G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR)* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Ryan T. Strachan,et al.  Regulation of Beta-2-Adrenergic Receptor Function by Conformationally Selective Single-domain Intrabodies , 2013 .

[5]  L. Kay,et al.  Tracing an allosteric pathway regulating the activity of the HslV protease , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Chris Abell,et al.  A three-stage biophysical screening cascade for fragment-based drug discovery , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[7]  K. Garcia,et al.  Adrenaline-activated structure of the β2-adrenoceptor stabilized by an engineered nanobody , 2013, Nature.

[8]  G. Balboni,et al.  Ligands Raise the Constraint That Limits Constitutive Activation in G Protein-coupled Opioid Receptors* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  The Dynamic Process of β2-Adrenergic Receptor Activation , 2013, Cell.

[10]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Biased Signaling Pathways in β2-Adrenergic Receptor Characterized by 19F-NMR , 2012, Science.

[11]  Ichio Shimada,et al.  Efficacy of the β2-adrenergic receptor is determined by conformational equilibrium in the transmembrane region , 2012, Nature Communications.

[12]  S. Iwata,et al.  G protein-coupled receptor inactivation by an allosteric inverse-agonist antibody , 2011, Nature.

[13]  Kunhong Xiao,et al.  Multiple ligand-specific conformations of the β2-adrenergic receptor. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[14]  Sudarshan Rajagopal,et al.  Quantifying Ligand Bias at Seven-Transmembrane Receptors , 2011, Molecular Pharmacology.

[15]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Crystal Structure of the β2Adrenergic Receptor-Gs protein complex , 2011, Nature.

[16]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Two distinct conformations of helix 6 observed in antagonist-bound structures of a β1-adrenergic receptor , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  S. Rasmussen,et al.  Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β2 adrenoceptor , 2010, Nature.

[18]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[19]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[20]  T. Costa,et al.  Allosteric coupling and conformational fluctuations in proteins. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.

[21]  Ron O Dror,et al.  Identification of two distinct inactive conformations of the β2-adrenergic receptor reconciles structural and biochemical observations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[23]  Richard N. Zare,et al.  A monomeric G protein-coupled receptor isolated in a high-density lipoprotein particle efficiently activates its G protein , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  David Colquhoun,et al.  The quantitative analysis of drug-receptor interactions: a short history. , 2006, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[25]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[26]  K. Pakdaman,et al.  Complex ligand-protein systems: a globally convergent iterative method for the n×m case , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.

[27]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Activation of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor Involves Disruption of an Ionic Lock between the Cytoplasmic Ends of Transmembrane Segments 3 and 6* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  D. Colquhoun,et al.  Binding, gating, affinity and efficacy: The interpretation of structure‐activity relationships for agonists and of the effects of mutating receptors , 1998, British journal of pharmacology.

[29]  B. Kobilka Amino and carboxyl terminal modifications to facilitate the production and purification of a G protein-coupled receptor. , 1995, Analytical biochemistry.

[30]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  A mutation-induced activated state of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor. Extending the ternary complex model. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  F. Ehlert The relationship between muscarinic receptor occupancy and adenylate cyclase inhibition in the rabbit myocardium. , 1985, Molecular pharmacology.

[32]  A. De Léan,et al.  The ternary complex model. Its properties and application to ligand interactions with the D2-dopamine receptor of the anterior pituitary gland. , 1984, Molecular pharmacology.

[33]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[34]  S. Meiboom,et al.  Modified Spin‐Echo Method for Measuring Nuclear Relaxation Times , 1958 .

[35]  Y. Kosmann-Schwarzbach,et al.  Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications , 2008 .