Model performance for the determination of appropriate harvest levels in the case of data-poor stocks

The determination of harvest limits for data-poor and data-limited stocks poses unique challenges for traditional complex stock assessment methods. Simulation is used to examine the performance of two new data-poor assessment methods, Depletion Corrected Average Catch (DCAC) and Depletion-Based Stock Reduction Analysis (DB-SRA), and a more complex catch-at-age method, Stock Synthesis (SS), in terms of estimating harvest levels for two life-history types (U.S. west coast flatfish and rockfish) under varying mis-specifications of parameter distributions. DCAC and DB-SRA are fairly robust to mis-specification of the distributions for natural mortality and the productivity parameter (the fishing mortality rate that corresponds to maximum sustainable yield relative to natural mortality) for the flatfish life-history, but led to greater error for the rockfish life-history when estimating harvest levels that would not result in overfishing. SS estimates of the harvest level increased when natural mortality was set to a higher value than the true value for both life-histories. Both DCAC and DB-SRA were highly sensitive to the assumed distribution for the ratio of the current to starting biomass and provided overestimates of the harvest level when based on an overly optimistic value for this ratio.

[1]  R. D. Stanley,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of recruitment parameters and reference points for Pacific rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) under alternative assumptions about the stock–recruit function , 2010 .

[2]  A. Maccall,et al.  Estimates of Sustainable Yield for 50 Data-Poor Stocks in the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan , 2013 .

[3]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  The state of the art in stock assessment: where we are and where we are going , 2003 .

[4]  Rainer Froese,et al.  Keep it simple: three indicators to deal with overfishing , 2004 .

[5]  C. J. Kelly,et al.  ‘Cheap and dirty’ fisheries science and management in the North Atlantic , 2006 .

[6]  Steven J. D. Martell,et al.  Fisheries Ecology and Management , 2004 .

[7]  Daniel H. Ito,et al.  Generalized Stock Reduction Analysis , 1984 .

[8]  M. Dorn,et al.  Advice on West Coast Rockfish Harvest Rates from Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Stock−Recruit Relationships , 2002 .

[9]  E. Cortés,et al.  Analytical reference points for age-structured models: application to data-poor fisheries , 2010 .

[10]  André E. Punt,et al.  Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures , 1999 .

[11]  Carl Walters,et al.  Lessons for stock assessment from the northern cod collapse , 1996, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[12]  André E. Punt,et al.  Among-stock comparisons for improving stock assessments of data-poor stocks: the “Robin Hood” approach , 2011 .

[13]  Washington Groundfish Fishery.  PACIFIC COAST GROUNDFISH FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN , 2005 .

[14]  André E. Punt,et al.  Reconciling Approaches to the Assessment and Management of Data-Poor Species and Fisheries with Australia's Harvest Strategy Policy , 2009 .

[15]  Steven J. D. Martell,et al.  A stochastic approach to stock reduction analysis , 2006 .

[16]  Alec D. MacCall,et al.  Depletion-corrected average catch: a simple formula for estimating sustainable yields in data-poor situations , 2009 .

[17]  M. Prager,et al.  Delay in fishery management: diminished yield, longer rebuilding, and increased probability of stock collapse1 , 2007 .

[18]  Ransom A. Myers,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in the biological basis of fisheries management by meta-analysis of data from many populations: a synthesis , 1998 .

[19]  André E. Punt,et al.  Length-Based Reference Points for Data-Limited Situations: Applications and Restrictions , 2009 .