Barriers and Facilitators to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis by Men Who Have Sex with Men and Community Stakeholders in Malaysia

Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia are disproportionately affected by HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an evidence-based HIV prevention strategy; yet, uptake remains low among Malaysian MSM, who have a limited understanding of barriers to PrEP. Methods: We employed the nominal group technique (NGT), a structured mixed-methods strategy to understand the barriers and facilitators to PrEP use among Malaysian MSM, combined with a qualitative focus group. Six virtual focus group sessions, three among MSM (n = 20) and three among stakeholders (n = 16), were conducted using a video-conferencing platform. Rank-ordering of barriers from NGT was recorded, and thematic analysis was conducted for content. Results: Similar barriers were reported by MSM and community stakeholders, with aggregated costs associated with PrEP care (e.g., consultation with a clinician, medication, laboratory testing) being the greatest barrier, followed by limited knowledge and awareness of PrEP. Additionally, the lack of access to PrEP providers, the complex clinical protocol for PrEP initiation and follow-up, and social stigma undermined PrEP delivery. Qualitative discussions identified potential new strategies to overcome these barriers, including expanded outreach efforts to reach hard-to-reach MSM, a ‘one-stop’ delivery model for PrEP services, a patient-centered decision aid to guide PrEP uptake, and easy access to LGBT-friendly PrEP providers. Conclusion: Current barriers may be overcome through governmental subsidy for PrEP and evidence-informed shared decision aids to support both MSM and PrEP providers.

[1]  D. Vlahov,et al.  Using nominal group technique to identify barriers and facilitators to preventing HIV using combination same-day pre-exposure prophylaxis and medications for opioid use disorder , 2022, Harm Reduction Journal.

[2]  F. Altice,et al.  Exploring Malaysian Physicians' Intention to Discriminate Against Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Patients. , 2022, LGBT health.

[3]  M. Lyons,et al.  Acceptance of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) referral among a sample of PrEP-eligible emergency department patients. , 2022, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[4]  L. Bekker,et al.  Acceptability and feasibility of leveraging community‐based HIV counselling and testing platforms for same‐day oral PrEP initiation among adolescent girls and young women in Eastern Cape, South Africa , 2022, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[5]  J. Wickersham,et al.  Exploring drivers of pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Malaysia , 2022, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[6]  S. Chariyalertsak,et al.  A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) between hospital and Key Population Led Health Service providers: Lessons for Thailand’s Universal Health Coverage implementation , 2022, PloS one.

[7]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Public Health Implications of Adapting HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Programs for Virtual Service Delivery in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review , 2022, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[8]  N. McGrath,et al.  Process evaluation of peer-to-peer delivery of HIV self-testing and sexual health information to support HIV prevention among youth in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: qualitative analysis , 2022, BMJ Open.

[9]  Gabrielle E. O'Malley,et al.  A one‐stop shop model for improved efficiency of pre‐exposure prophylaxis delivery in public clinics in western Kenya: a mixed methods implementation science study , 2021, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[10]  S. Sosa-Rubí,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among male sex workers in Mexico: an application of the RE-AIM framework , 2021, BMC Public Health.

[11]  Al Liu,et al.  Expanding the Pie–Differentiated PrEP Delivery Models to Improve PrEP Uptake in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2021, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[12]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Preference for and Efficacy of a PrEP Decision Aid for Women with Substance Use Disorders , 2021, Patient preference and adherence.

[13]  A. Aguiar,et al.  Knowledge and Use of PEP and PrEP Among Key Populations Tested in Community Centers in Portugal , 2021, Frontiers in Public Health.

[14]  D. Moore,et al.  PrEP University: A Multi-Disciplinary University-Based HIV Prevention Education Program , 2021, Journal of Community Health.

[15]  David A. Moskowitz,et al.  “It’s Very Inconvenient for Me”: A Mixed-Method Study Assessing Barriers and Facilitators of Adolescent Sexual Minority Males Attending PrEP Follow-Up Appointments , 2021, AIDS and Behavior.

[16]  K. Nyhan,et al.  Messaging matters: achieving equity in the HIV response through public health communication. , 2021, The lancet. HIV.

[17]  M. Andrasik,et al.  Perceptions of Sexual Risk, PrEP Services, and Peer Navigation Support Among HIV-Negative Latinx and Black Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) Residing in Western Washington , 2021, Sexuality Research and Social Policy.

[18]  P. Phanuphak,et al.  Client and provider preferences for HIV care: Implications for implementing differentiated service delivery in Thailand , 2021, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[19]  T. Finlayson,et al.  Health Care Coverage and Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Living in 22 US Cities With Medicaid Expansion, 2017. , 2021, American journal of public health.

[20]  F. Altice,et al.  Using individual stated-preferences to optimize HIV self-testing service delivery among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia: results from a conjoint-based analysis , 2020, BMC Public Health.

[21]  J. Schneider,et al.  Same-day prescribing of daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. , 2020, The lancet. HIV.

[22]  L. Wong,et al.  Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Research of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM). , 2020, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[23]  J. Uhrig,et al.  Effectively Communicating About HIV and Other Health Disparities: Findings From a Literature Review and Future Directions , 2020, Frontiers in Communication.

[24]  J. Bauermeister,et al.  PrEP Product Acceptability and Dual Process Decision-Making Among Men Who Have Sex with Men , 2020, Current HIV/AIDS Reports.

[25]  J. McVeigh,et al.  Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): A Scoping Review on PrEP Service Delivery and Programming , 2020, AIDS and Behavior.

[26]  R. Walensky,et al.  Medicare Part D and Cost-Sharing for Antiretroviral Therapy and Preexposure Prophylaxis , 2020, JAMA network open.

[27]  Benedikt Pleuhs,et al.  Health Care Provider Barriers to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the United States: A Systematic Review. , 2020, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[28]  T. Holtz,et al.  Facilitators and barriers affecting PrEP adherence among Thai men who have sex with men (MSM) in the HPTN 067/ADAPT Study , 2020, AIDS care.

[29]  E. Gardner,et al.  Same-Day HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Initiation During Drop-in Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic Appointments Is a Highly Acceptable, Feasible, and Safe Model that Engages Individuals at Risk for HIV into PrEP Care , 2019, Open forum infectious diseases.

[30]  Declan T. Barry,et al.  Using nominal group technique among clinical providers to identify barriers and prioritize solutions to scaling up opioid agonist therapies in Ukraine. , 2017, The International journal on drug policy.

[31]  J. Wickersham,et al.  Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in Malaysia: Findings from an online survey , 2017, PloS one.

[32]  A. Bourne,et al.  Willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia: findings from a qualitative study , 2017, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[33]  Zahra Fazli Khalaf,et al.  The Experience of Intimate Relationships Among Homosexual Men in Malaysia , 2017 .

[34]  Alana D. Steffen,et al.  Physician Decisions to Defer Antiretroviral Therapy in Key Populations: Implications for Reducing Human Immunodeficiency Virus Incidence and Mortality in Malaysia , 2017, Open forum infectious diseases.

[35]  Adem Sav,et al.  The ideal healthcare: priorities of people with chronic conditions and their carers , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.

[36]  S. Patman,et al.  Developing minimum clinical standards for physiotherapy in South African intensive care units: the nominal group technique in action. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[37]  Amanda J. Wheeler,et al.  Using the Nominal Group Technique: how to analyse across multiple groups , 2014, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[38]  F. Altice,et al.  Exploring intentions to discriminate against patients living with HIV/AIDS among future healthcare providers in Malaysia , 2014, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[39]  Margaret A. Chesney,et al.  Critical Delays in HIV Testing and Care , 1999 .

[40]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[41]  B. Grinsztejn,et al.  Barreiras e facilitadores do acesso de populações vulneráveis à PrEP no Brasil: Estudo ImPrEP Stakeholders , 2022, Cadernos de Saúde Pública.

[42]  F. Altice,et al.  Stigma Toward Men Who Have Sex with Men Among Future Healthcare Providers in Malaysia: Would More Interpersonal Contact Reduce Prejudice? , 2015, AIDS and Behavior.