The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech

The effect of perceived spatial separation, induced by the precedence effect, on release from noise or speech masking was investigated. Listeners were asked to orally repeat Chinese nonsense sentences, which were spoken by a female talker and presented by both the left (-45 degrees) and right (+45 degrees) loudspeakers, when maskers, which were either speech-spectrum noise sounds or Chinese nonsense sentences spoken by two other female talkers, were presented by the same two loudspeakers. Delays between identical sounds presented over the two loudspeakers were used to control the perceived locations of the target (right only) and masker (right, center, or left). The results show that perceived 45 degrees and 90 degrees separations of target speech from masking speech led to equivalently marked improvement in speech recognition, even though the degree of improvement was smaller than that reported in [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106 (1999) 3578 (using English nonsense speech)]. When the masker was noise, however, perceived separation only marginally improved speech recognition. These results indicate that release from informational masking, due to perceived target/masker spatial separation induced by the precedence effect, also occurs for tonal Chinese speech. Compared to the 45 degrees perceived within-hemifield separation, the 90 degrees perceived cross-hemifield separation does not produce further unmasking.

[1]  Lawrence S. Kroll Mathematica--A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer. , 1989 .

[2]  E. B. Newman,et al.  The precedence effect in sound localization. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  H S Colburn,et al.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R L Freyman,et al.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J M Besing,et al.  A Procedure for Testing Speech Intelligibility in a Virtual Listening Environment , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[7]  C. Mason,et al.  Release from masking due to spatial separation of sources in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  Liang Li,et al.  Auditory gating processes and binaural inhibition in the inferior colliculus , 2002, Hearing Research.

[10]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Sentence reception in noise from one versus two sources: effects of aging and hearing loss. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Azimuthal tuning of human perceptual channels for sound location. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[14]  D S Brungart,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  R Plomp,et al.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P M Zurek,et al.  The precedence effect and its possible role in the avoidance of interaural ambiguities. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A. Duquesnoy Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jian Kang Comparison of speech intelligibility between English and Chinese , 1998 .

[19]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Douglas S Brungart,et al.  The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  K S Helfer,et al.  Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[22]  H S Colburn,et al.  The precedence effect. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.