Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University-Industry Licensing

Understanding the nature of the involvement of faculty in university licensing is important for understanding how technology is transferred through licensing as well as more controversial issues, such as the need for university licensing. Using data from a survey of firms that actively license-in from universities we explore the importance of faculty in the licensing and development of inventions, as well as how and why they are used and how the use of faculty relates to characteristics of firms. In particular we find that the use of faculty through sponsored research in lieu of a license is closely related to the amount of basic research conducted by firms whereas the use of faculty within the terms of a license is related to the prevalence of personal contacts between industry R&D researchers and university faculty.

[1]  Rosalyn Stewart,et al.  Objectives , 1954, 2021 23rd International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[2]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty , 2005 .

[3]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[4]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[5]  Marie-Angèle de Looze,et al.  An analysis of innovation strategies and industrial differentiation through patent applications: the case of plant biotechnology , 1996 .

[6]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field , 1999 .

[7]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[8]  Roberto Mazzoleni,et al.  How Do University Inventions Get into Practice ? , 2000 .

[9]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[10]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Saul Lach Incentives and Invention in Universities1 , 2003 .

[12]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[13]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support , 1996 .

[14]  Kwanghui Lim,et al.  The many faces of absorptive capacity : spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips , 2000 .

[15]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[16]  L. Zucker,et al.  Virtuous Circles of Productivity: Star Bioscientists and the Institutional Transformation of Industry , 1995 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[18]  James D. Adams,et al.  Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers , 2001 .

[19]  C. Jansen,et al.  Where Do the Leads for Licences Come From? , 2000 .

[20]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Incentives and Invention in Universities , 2003 .

[21]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .