Simulation and experimental observation of contact conditions between stents and artery models.

Treatment of coronary artery stenosis with percutaneous coronary angioplasty and stenting is sometimes complicated by neointimal hyperplasia, possibly due to interaction of the stent with the arterial wall within a specific contact area. Therefore, we characterized the stress distribution at the contacts between the stent and the artery using mathematical and experimental modeling (an arterial cylinder model with a tube-like structure and an arterial stenosis model, consisting of a tube and plaque portion) and two kinds of link stents with different numbers of cells and links. First, the contact condition was investigated using a finite element method (FEM). Second, experimental visualization of the contact area between the stent and the artery models was performed. Comparison of the experimental results with the FEM analysis revealed that the contact area between the stent (with a high number of cells and links) and the artery model was distributed over the total surface of the stent. Further, values obtained from the experimental distribution and the calculated distribution were similar. These data indicate that experimental modeling and FEM analysis are useful methods for analyzing the relationship between stent structure and stent/wall stress distributions and may help guide the design of new stents.

[1]  D. Ku,et al.  Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in the Human Carotid Bifurcation: Positive Correlation between Plaque Location and Low and Oscillating Shear Stress , 1985, Arteriosclerosis.

[2]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. S. Williams,et al.  Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. , 2000, Circulation.

[4]  Weiqiang Wang,et al.  Analysis of the transient expansion behavior and design optimization of coronary stents by finite element method. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Gary S. Mintz,et al.  Nonuniform Strut Distribution Correlates With More Neointimal Hyperplasia After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation , 2004, Circulation.

[6]  R Beyar,et al.  Evaluation of the compressive mechanical properties of endoluminal metal stents. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[7]  John F LaDisa,et al.  Circumferential vascular deformation after stent implantation alters wall shear stress evaluated with time-dependent 3D computational fluid dynamics models. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  Renu Virmani,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a short transitional edge protection balloon for intracoronary stent deployment , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  E. Edelman,et al.  Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. , 1999, Circulation research.

[10]  S. Chua,et al.  Finite element simulation of slotted tube (stent) with the presence of plaque and artery by balloon expansion , 2004 .

[11]  R. Lutz,et al.  Comparison of mechanical deformation properties of metallic stents with use of stress-strain analysis. , 1994, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[12]  R. Virmani,et al.  Coronary stenting with a novel stainless steel balloon-expandable stent: determinants of neointimal formation and changes in arterial geometry after placement in an atherosclerotic model. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Ken Ikeuchi,et al.  Study on Bending Stiffness of Stents. , 2001 .

[14]  Zbigniew Paszenda,et al.  Experimental and numerical biomechanical analysis of vascular stent , 2005 .

[15]  D. Szolar,et al.  Strength, elasticity, and plasticity of expandable metal stents: in vitro studies with three types of stress. , 1994, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[16]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R D Kamm,et al.  Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels. , 1992, Circulation research.

[18]  Hui Zhu,et al.  Comparison of coronary artery dynamics pre- and post-stenting. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  N. Weissman,et al.  Extent and distribution of in-stent intimal hyperplasia and edge effect in a non-radiation stent population. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Gerhard A Holzapfel,et al.  Changes in the mechanical environment of stenotic arteries during interaction with stents: computational assessment of parametric stent designs. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  F. Auricchio,et al.  Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  M. Leon,et al.  Chronic arterial responses to stent implantation: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of Palmaz-Schatz stents in native coronary arteries. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  A Rachev,et al.  A model of stress-induced geometrical remodeling of vessel segments adjacent to stents and artery/graft anastomoses. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  S Glagov,et al.  Fluid wall shear stress measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta: oscillatory behavior and relationship to atherosclerosis. , 1994, Atherosclerosis.