Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations.

Thirty routine patients, provided with fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated Brånemark implants in edentulous lower jaws, were arranged into three different groups with regard to design of the metal framework. Ten patients received cast gold alloy frames and the other two groups were provided with two different designs of welded titanium frames. The fit of the completed prostheses was measured in three dimensions (3-D) in relation to the master cast, by means of a photogrammetric technique, prior to insertion. Mean 3-D distortion of the centre point of the gold cylinder was 42 (s.d. 8) microns for the cast framework. The corresponding mean distortion for the two designs of titanium frameworks was 43 (s.d. 16) and 36 (s.d. 10) microns, respectively. Least distortion was observed in vertical direction for all three designs. None of the different designs of metal frames showed a significantly better fit (P > 0.05), but the cast and oldest titanium framework design presented a much wider range of distortion. This indicated a higher risk of sectioning and resoldering during the fabrication of the prostheses as compared to the more consistently fabricated prostheses, with a new titanium framework design.

[1]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[2]  T Jemt,et al.  Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  S Karlsson,et al.  The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. , 1993, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[4]  S C Khera,et al.  The effects of bevel angulation on marginal integrity. , 1981, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[5]  C Bessing,et al.  Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. , 1994, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  T. Jemt Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  G Oilo,et al.  The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. , 1985, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  N Stern,et al.  Effect of impression materials and techniques on the marginal fit of metal castings. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  A H Tjan,et al.  Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  T Jemt,et al.  Photogrammetric measurements of implant positions. Description of a technique to determine the fit between implants and superstructures. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  T Jemt,et al.  In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study. , 1991, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  G J Ziebert,et al.  Comparison of accuracy of multiunit one-piece castings. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  J I Nicholls,et al.  Distortion in dental soldering as affected by gap distance. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.