Discrimination Between Closed and Open Shell (Turkish) Pistachio Nuts Using Undecimated Wavelet Packet Transform

Due to low consumer acceptance and the possibility of immature kernels, closed-shell pistachio nuts should be separated from open-shell nuts before reaching the consumer. A system using impact acoustics as a means of classifying closed-shell nuts from open-shell nuts has already been shown to be feasible and have better discrimination performance than a mechanical system.The accuracy of an impact acoustics based system is determined by the signal processing and feature extraction procedures. In this article, a new time-frequency plain feature extraction and classification algorithm was developed to discriminate between open- and closed-shell pistachio nuts produced in the Gaziantep region of Turkey. The proposed approach relies on the analysis of the impact acoustics signal of pistachio nuts, which are emitted from their impact with a steel plate after dropping from a certain height. Features are extracted by decomposing the acoustic signals into time and frequency components, using double-tree undecimated wavelet packet transform. The most discriminative features from the dual tree nodes are selected by a wrapper strategy that includes the structural pruning of the double-tree feature dictionary. The proposed approach requires no prior knowledge of the relevant time or frequency content of the acoustic signals. The algorithm used a small number of features and achieved a classification accuracy of 91.7% on the validation data set, while separating the closed shells from the open ones. A previously implemented algorithm, which uses maximum signal amplitude, absolute integration, and gradient features, achieved 82% classification accuracy on the same dataset. The results show that the time-frequency features extracted from impact acoustics can be used successfully for classification of open- and closed-shell Turkish pistachios.

[1]  Ahmed H. Tewfik,et al.  Extraction subject-specific motor imagery time-frequency patterns for single trial EEG classification , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[2]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Tom C. Pearson Detection of pistachio nuts with closed-shells using impact acoustics. , 2000 .

[4]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Discriminant feature extraction using empirical probability density estimation and a local basis library , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  A. Ghazanfari,et al.  Machine Vision Grading of Pistachio Nuts Using Fourier Descriptors , 1997 .

[6]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Wavelets, approximation, and compression , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[7]  Michael Unser,et al.  Texture classification and segmentation using wavelet frames , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  Mark A. Hall,et al.  Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning , 2003 .

[9]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[10]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[12]  K. Englehart,et al.  Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[14]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[15]  Nuri Firat Ince,et al.  Classification of single trial motor imagery EEG recordings with subject adapted non-dyadic arbitrary time–frequency tilings , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.