Risk assessment of groundwater pollution with a new methodological framework: application of Dempster–Shafer theory and GIS

Managing natural groundwater resources is challenged by nitrate pollution resulting from agricultural activities. This issue is emerging as an important environmental concern that needs to be addressed through effective groundwater management. Groundwater assessment is an important aspect of groundwater management, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. This study focused on the Kerman Plain, which is exposed to intensive agricultural activities and land exploitation that result in intense land pollution. The effects of nitrate pollution may be controlled by applying specific measures. Dempster–Shafer theory (DST) was applied in this study to develop a new methodology for assessing pollution risk. Applying this theory as a pioneering approach to assessing groundwater pollution risk is the novel component of this research. This approach provides a major advantage by dealing with varying levels of precision related to information. The spatial association between DRASTIC parameters including D (depth of water), R (net recharge), A (aquifer media), S (soil media), T (topography), I (impact of vadose zone) and C (hydraulic conductivity) and underground nitrate occurrence was evaluated by applying bivariate DST to assign mass functions. Dempster’s rule of combination using GIS was then applied to determine a series of combined mass functions for multiple hydrogeological data layers. The uncertainty of system responses was directly addressed by the proposed methodology. Finally, the modified DRASTIC map with the highest validity and accuracy was selected and combined with the damage map. The comparison between nitrate distribution and vulnerability and the risk maps exhibit high similarity between different vulnerability degrees and nitrate concentrations. Long-term planning of preventive measures and associated developments can be aided by the regions with low and very low risks located in the northeast, northwest, and central regions.

[1]  L. Aller,et al.  DRASTIC: A System to Evaluate the Pollution Potential of Hydrogeologic Settings by Pesticides , 1986 .

[2]  A. Leone,et al.  Vulnerability and risk evaluation of agricultural nitrogen pollution for Hungary's main aquifer using DRASTIC and GLEAMS models. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Michael A. Niedzielski,et al.  Comparative study of specific groundwater vulnerability of a karst aquifer in central Florida , 2012 .

[4]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Risk assessment of groundwater pollution using Monte Carlo approach in an agricultural region: An example from Kerman Plain, Iran , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[5]  J. C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for Models of Complex Systems , 2008 .

[6]  Barnali M. Dixon,et al.  Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence for groundwater vulnerability assessment in Maragheh-Bonab plain aquifer, Iran. , 2013 .

[7]  José A. Malpica,et al.  Dempster-Shafer Theory in geographic information systems: A survey , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping at Golestan Province, Iran: A comparison between frequency ratio, Dempster-Shafer, and weights-of-evidence models , 2012 .

[9]  A. Fabbri,et al.  Single-parameter sensitivity analysis for aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC and SINTACS , 2009 .

[10]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Regional prediction of landslide hazard using probability analysis of intense rainfall in the Hoa Binh province, Vietnam , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[11]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  Categorical Indicator Kriging for assessing the risk of groundwater nitrate pollution: the case of Vega de Granada aquifer (SE Spain). , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  B. Pradhan,et al.  An integrated DRASTIC model using frequency ratio and two new hybrid methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[13]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[14]  Wooil M. Moon,et al.  Integration Of Geophysical And Geological Data Using Evidential Belief Function , 1990 .

[15]  E. Carranza,et al.  Selection of coherent deposit-type locations and their application in data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping , 2008 .

[16]  T. Blaschke,et al.  GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[17]  Husam Baalousha,et al.  Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. , 2010 .

[18]  Shakhawat Chowdhury,et al.  Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  N. Lambrakis,et al.  Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece , 2007 .

[20]  E. Carranza,et al.  Spatial analysis of mutual fault, fracture and slope controls on rocksliding in Darjeeling Himalaya, India , 2010 .

[21]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A Comparison Between Probabilistic and Dempster‐Shafer Theory Approaches to Model Uncertainty Analysis in the Performance Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Chuanrong Zhang,et al.  Predictive mapping of soil total nitrogen at a regional scale: A comparison between geographically weighted regression and cokriging , 2013 .

[23]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[24]  G. Bonham-Carter,et al.  On Knowledge-based Approach Of Integrating Remote Sensing, Geophysical And Geological Information , 1992, [Proceedings] IGARSS '92 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[25]  Hamed Assaf,et al.  Geostatistical Assessment of Groundwater Nitrate Contamination with Reflection on DRASTIC Vulnerability Assessment: The Case of the Upper Litani Basin, Lebanon , 2009 .

[26]  Kourosh Mohammadi,et al.  Calibrating DRASTIC using field measurements, sensitivity analysis and statistical methods to assess groundwater vulnerability , 2011 .

[27]  B. Zahraie,et al.  Identification of long-term annual pattern of meteorological drought based on spatiotemporal methods: evaluation of different geostatistical approaches , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[28]  Elias Dimitriou,et al.  Groundwater risk assessment at a heavily industrialised catchment and the associated impacts on a peri-urban wetland. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Barnali M. Dixon,et al.  Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh–Bonab plain aquifer, Iran , 2013 .

[30]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Predicting the spatial variation of the soil organic carbon pool at a regional scale. , 2010 .

[31]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Manifestation of LiDAR-Derived Parameters in the Spatial Prediction of Landslides Using Novel Ensemble Evidential Belief Functions and Support Vector Machine Models in GIS , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[32]  M. H. Abokharima,et al.  Land subsidence susceptibility mapping at Kinta Valley (Malaysia) using the evidential belief function model in GIS , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[33]  E. Carranza,et al.  Predictive mapping of prospectivity and quantitative estimation of undiscovered VMS deposits in Skellefte district (Sweden) , 2010 .

[34]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Landslide Hazard Using Fuzzy k‐means and Dempster‐Shafer Theory , 2005, Trans. GIS.

[35]  E. Carranza.  Analysis and mapping of geochemical anomalies using logratio-transformed stream sediment data with c , 2011 .

[36]  Luis Cayuela,et al.  Classification of a complex landscape using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence , 2006 .

[37]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[38]  David M Wolock,et al.  Identifying pathways and processes affecting nitrate and orthophosphate inputs to streams in agricultural watersheds. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[39]  Yi Peng,et al.  Developing a probability-based model of aquifer vulnerability in an agricultural region , 2013 .

[40]  Honghan Chen,et al.  Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[41]  Kari Sentz,et al.  Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2002 .

[42]  Emmanuel John M. Carranza,et al.  Predicting Lahar-Inundation Zones: Case Study in West Mount Pinatubo, Philippines , 2006 .

[43]  B. Pradhan,et al.  Application of GIS based data driven evidential belief function model to predict groundwater potential zonation , 2014 .

[44]  Amadou K. Thiam,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach to Land Degradation Evaluation: Dempster‐Shafer Theory of Evidence , 2005, Trans. GIS.

[45]  Fernando António Leal Pacheco,et al.  The multivariate statistical structure of DRASTIC model , 2013 .

[46]  E. Carranza,et al.  Spatial Association of Mineral Occurrences and Curvilinear Geological Features , 2002 .

[47]  Tetsuya Hiyama,et al.  A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Kakamigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, central Japan. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  L. Ribeiro,et al.  Application of a groundwater quality index as an assessment and communication tool in agro-environmental policies – Two Portuguese case studies , 2006 .

[49]  J Papathanasiou,et al.  A multicriteria model for planning agricultural regions within a context of groundwater rational management. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  Cristiano Ballabio,et al.  Reliability of groundwater vulnerability maps obtained through statistical methods. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[51]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[52]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS , 2014 .

[53]  L. Zini,et al.  Intrinsic vulnerability assessment of Sette Comuni Plateau aquifer (Veneto Region, Italy). , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[54]  E. Cummins,et al.  Assessing the vulnerability of groundwater to pollution in Ireland based on the COST-620 Pan-European approach. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[55]  S. Saidi,et al.  Assessment of groundwater risk using intrinsic vulnerability and hazard mapping: Application to Souassi aquifer, Tunisian Sahel , 2011 .

[56]  S. Jellali,et al.  Ranking suitable sites for irrigation with reclaimed water in the Nabeul-Hammamet region (Tunisia) using GIS and AHP-multicriteria decision analysis , 2012 .

[57]  L. Aller,et al.  Drastic: A Standardized System to Evaluate Groundwater Pollution Potential using Hydrogeologic Setting , 1987 .

[58]  Biswajeet Pradhan,et al.  Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of , 2012 .