The Triple Helix Model and the Knowledge-Based Economy

The Triple Helix model of university-industry-government relations can be generalized from a neo-institutional model of networks of relations to a neo-evolutionary model of how three selection environments operate upon one another. Two selection mechanisms operating upon each other can mutually shape a trajectory, while three selection environments can be expected to generate a regime. The neo-evolutionary model enables us to appreciate both organizational integration in university-industry-government relations and differentiation among functions like wealth creation, knowledge production, and legislation. The specification of systems of innovations in terms of nations, sectors, and regions can then be formulated as empirical questions: is synergy generated among functions in a network of relations? Thus, this Triple Helix model enables us to study the knowledge base of an economy in terms of a trade-off between locally stabilized and (potentially locked-in) trajectories versus techno-economic regimes at the global level.

[1]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[2]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process , 1940 .

[3]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[4]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[5]  N. Luhmann Soziale Systeme : Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie , 1984 .

[6]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[7]  Michael Sonis,et al.  Nonlinear Socio-Ecological Dynamics and First Principles of Collective Choice Behavior of “Homo Socialis , 2000 .

[8]  A. M. Turing,et al.  The chemical basis of morphogenesis , 1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[9]  Eduardo Castro,et al.  Can a strategic project for a university be strategic to regional development , 1997 .

[10]  K. Frenken A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997) , 2000 .

[11]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Glenn C. Loury,et al.  Market Structure and Innovation , 1979 .

[13]  S. Counce The Strategy of the Genes , 1958, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[14]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[15]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Technological guideposts and innovation avenues , 1993 .

[16]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Industrial innovation and public policy: R Rothwell and W Zegveld London (1981) 251 pp , 1982 .

[17]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009 .

[18]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The complex dynamics of technological innovation: A comparison of models using cellular automata , 2002 .

[19]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science , 2002 .

[20]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[21]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[22]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage , 2006 .

[23]  K. Frenken Innovation, Evolution and Complexity Theory , 2006 .

[24]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[25]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[26]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[27]  N. Rashevsky,et al.  An approach to the mathematical biophysics of biological self-regulation and of cell polarity , 1940 .

[28]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[29]  A. Link,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices : An Exploratory Study # , 1999 .

[30]  青木 昌彦,et al.  比較制度分析 = Towards a comparative institutional analysis , 2001 .

[31]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[32]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[33]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[34]  Stanley N. Salthe,et al.  Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology , 1993 .

[35]  Robert M. May,et al.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics , 1976, Nature.

[36]  R. Whitley The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[37]  Freiberger Arbeitspapiere,et al.  Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics , 2005 .

[38]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Technological developments and factor substitution in a complex and dynamic system. , 1998 .

[39]  L. Leydesdorff The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated , 2006 .

[40]  Loet Leydesdorff A Methodological Perspective on the Evaluation of the Promotion of University–Industry–Government Relations , 2003 .

[41]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific , 1996 .

[42]  Devendra Sahal,et al.  Alternative conceptions of technology , 1981 .

[43]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition : The Realization of the Living (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Scie , 1980 .

[44]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The non-linear dynamics of meaning processing in social systems , 2009, 0911.1037.

[45]  Kurt Danziger The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power , 1997 .

[46]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[47]  C. Wagner,et al.  The New Invisible College , 2009 .

[48]  Cooper H. Langford,et al.  The ‘well-stirred reactor’: Evolution of industry-government-university relations in Canada , 1997 .

[49]  B. Latour Give me a Laboratory and 1 will raise the Word , 1983 .

[50]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2014 .

[51]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  M. Crowe,et al.  INTERACTION: Social Interaction. , 1974 .

[53]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[54]  David Charles,et al.  Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property , 1999 .

[55]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[56]  W. Ashby,et al.  Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems , 1991 .

[57]  B. Carlsson Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[58]  Werner Ebeling,et al.  A stochastic model of technological evolution , 1992 .

[59]  O. Morgenstern,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. , 1940 .

[60]  J. Kornai,et al.  From Socialism to Capitalism and Democracy , 2003 .

[61]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies , 1998 .

[62]  Apresentação Paulo Bastos Tigre Bengt-Åke Lundvall - Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation , 2009 .

[63]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  The Commercialization of Science and the Response of STS , 2008 .

[64]  Ernst Braun Industrial innovation and public policy , 1982 .

[65]  Marco Bellandi,et al.  From Industrial Districts to Local Development: An Itinerary of Research , 2003 .

[66]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Anticipatory systems: philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations , 2012, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[67]  F. Tödtling,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems , 2011 .

[68]  B. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[69]  Dr Tony McCall,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems , 2010 .

[70]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action , 2008 .

[71]  S. Kostof America by Design , 1987 .

[72]  Paola Criscuolo,et al.  The 'home advantage' effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USPTO and the EPO , 2006, Scientometrics.

[73]  Bo Carlsson Technological systems in the bio industries : an international study , 2002 .

[74]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[75]  C. S. Wagner,et al.  International collaboration in science : a new dynamic for knowledge creation , 2004 .

[76]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[77]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[78]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[79]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Agricultural productivity differences among countries. , 1970 .

[80]  A. Inzelt,et al.  The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition , 2004 .

[81]  Philippe C. Schmitter,et al.  Patterns of corporatist policy-making , 1983 .

[82]  Balázs Lengyel,et al.  A külföldi érdekeltségű vállalkozások és az egyetemek kapcsolatai Győrött, Miskolcon és Szegeden , 2006 .