Meeting the Challenge: Factors in the Design and Acquisition of Human- Engineered Systems

The design of effective military systems requires consideration of the skills, capabilities and fundamental performance limitations of end-user personnel involved in operations and maintenance over the life of the system. This concept, culminating in MANPRINT, is an important coalescence of system human engineering philosophy and concerns that have been evolving since World War II. Achieving a satisfactory match between system capabilities and the performance characteristics of users presumes the availability of requisite knowledge and the means to act upon it in the course of system design. The major challenges to broad acceptance and implementation of this concept lie in the ability to ensure an adequate supply of: (1)Useful and Usable Data Resources. Applicable MANPRINT data are needed that can be traded off against equipment variables; (2) Effective Methods and Media. Reliable means are needed to support the retrieval and application of people-oriented resources in the context of system acquisition and design. Also needed are methodologies and metrics for the test and evaluation of “MANPRINTed” system designs; and (3) Sophisticated and Motivated Users. Designers, design management and system acquisition personnel must believe that consideration of MANPRINT factors is “valuable” to the design of effective systems. Designing for the inclusion of these elements vitally depends on influencing individual, organizational and regulatory variables that jointly influence and support the design and acquisition processes.

[1]  Thomas B. Malone,et al.  Human Factors Engineering impact on System Workload and Manning Levels , 1986 .

[2]  Beverly M. Huey,et al.  Human Performance Models for Computer-Aided Engineering , 1990 .

[3]  Robert M. Elton Manprint (Manpower and Personnel Integration) , 1986 .

[4]  A. W. Melton,et al.  Psychological Principles in System Development , 1962 .

[5]  F. C. Gentner USAF Aeronautical Systems Division's model manpower personnel, and training organization-an update , 1988, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[6]  William J. Cody,et al.  On the Design of Man-machine Systems: Principles, Practices, and Prospects , 1987 .

[7]  William B. Rouse,et al.  On the value of information in system design: A framework for understanding and aiding designers , 1986, Inf. Process. Manag..

[8]  Ruston M. Hunt,et al.  Search technology, Inc. , 1989, CHI '89.

[9]  Stanley Ozog,et al.  On the Value of Information , 2007, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[10]  William B. Rouse,et al.  System design: behavioral perspectives on designers, tools and organizations , 1987 .

[11]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Research Needs for Human Factors , 1983 .

[12]  Christensen Jm THE EMERGING ROLE OF ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY. AMRL-TR-64-88. , 1964 .

[13]  Harris M. Burte,et al.  Unified life cycle engineering , 1987 .

[14]  D. Meister Are Our Methods any Good? A Way to Find Out , 1983 .

[15]  James Coates,et al.  Heavy losses : the dangerous decline of American defense , 1986 .

[16]  Sandra H. Rouse,et al.  Human information seeking and design of information systems , 1984, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[18]  William R. King,et al.  An experimental study of the value of information , 1982 .

[19]  Kenneth R. Boff,et al.  Engineering data compendium : human perception and performance , 1988 .

[20]  A. P. Sage,et al.  Information systems engineering for distributed decisionmaking , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of human factors. , 1987 .

[22]  Andrew J. Pierre,et al.  The defense game , 1986 .

[23]  Andrew J. Pierre,et al.  The Pentagon and the Art of War , 1985 .

[24]  N. Feather Expectations and Actions , 2021 .