Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Dietary Records: A Pilot Study

Background/Aims: Paper-based dietary records (Paper-DR) can be replaced by web-based dietary records (Web-DR) in both epidemiological studies and clinical practice to reduce the time and logistic burden. We aimed to compare Paper-DR and Web-DR. Methods: We compared the matching of different food items (n = 1,103) from Paper-DR and Web-DR for energy and 48 nutrients among 16 pregnant volunteers, with DR for the same individuals matched for the same 4 days. Paper-DR were coded into the web-based version (referred to as Paper-Web-DR) independently by the same research dietitian. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing mean rank differences, Spearman's ρ to measure associations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement to evaluate the level of agreement between the two dietary methods across the range of parameters were used. Volunteers also completed an evaluation questionnaire regarding the user acceptability of Paper-DR and Web-DR. Results: A high correlation between Paper-DR and Web-DR was noted. There were statistically insignificant differences among 45 nutrients, except for free sugars (p < 0.001), α-linolenic acid (p = 0.041), folate (p = 0.036) and pantothenic acid (p = 0.023). Volunteers found the Paper-DR equally time-consuming as the Web-DR. The majority of the volunteers (75%) preferred the Web-DR. Conclusions: Paper-DR and Web-DR were comparable across a range of nutritional parameters, with a few exceptions. The Web-DR was more convenient for the majority and has substantial logistic and cost advantages.

[1]  W. Riley,et al.  Evaluation of a PDA-based Dietary Assessment and Intervention Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2006, Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

[2]  Jeff Davies.  Reproduced with the permission of Bird life Australia and , 2013 .

[3]  F. Bennett,et al.  Use of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Jamaican adults: validation and correlation with biomarkers , 2011, Nutrition journal.

[4]  M. A. Calhau,et al.  General principles for the collection of national food consumption data in the view of a pan-European dietary survey 1 European Food Safety Authority , 2009 .

[5]  Barbara Koroušić Seljak,et al.  The Slovenian food composition database. , 2013, Food chemistry.

[6]  B. Koroušić Seljak,et al.  Food composition databases for effective quality nutritional care. , 2013, Food chemistry.

[7]  Barbara Koroušić Seljak,et al.  Computer-based dietary menu planning: how to support it by complex knowledge? , 2010 .

[8]  Corey Greenlaw,et al.  A Comparison of Web-Based and Paper-Based Survey Methods , 2009, Evaluation review.

[9]  I. Huybrechts,et al.  Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  D. A. T. Southgate,et al.  Food Composition Data: Production, Management and Use , 1992 .

[11]  Mathilde Touvier,et al.  Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire , 2010, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[12]  L. Burke,et al.  Using a personal digital assistant for self-monitoring influences diet quality in comparison to a standard paper record among overweight/obese adults. , 2011, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[13]  Lora E Burke,et al.  Self-monitoring dietary intake: current and future practices. , 2005, Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation.

[14]  M. Touvier,et al.  Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies , 2010, British Journal of Nutrition.

[15]  A. Stone,et al.  Ancillary study to the PREFER trial: a descriptive study of participants' patterns of self-monitoring--rationale, design and preliminary experiences. , 2006, Contemporary clinical trials.

[16]  J. P. Madden,et al.  Validity of the 24-hr. dietary recall and seven-day record for group comparisons. , 1978, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[17]  C. Dujovne,et al.  Methods to assess relative reliability of diet records: minimum records for monitoring lipid and caloric intake. , 1986, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[18]  D. Mackerras,et al.  The reliability of ten-year dietary recall: implications for cancer research. , 2003, The Journal of nutrition.

[19]  Lea Maes,et al.  Feasibility of the Young Children's Nutrition Assessment on the Web. , 2009, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[20]  N. Fidler Mis,et al.  Dietary Intake of Macro- and Micronutrients in Slovenian Adolescents: Comparison with Reference Values , 2012, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.

[21]  Janice Baranowski,et al.  The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children. , 2002, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[22]  H. Vorster,et al.  A culture-sensitive quantitative food frequency questionnaire used in an African population: 1. Development and reproducibility , 2001, Public Health Nutrition.

[23]  L. Serra-Majem,et al.  New technologies applied to food frequency questionnaires: a current perspective. , 2011, Nutrición Hospitalaria.

[24]  S. W. Souci,et al.  Food composition and nutrition tables. , 2000 .

[25]  J. Who,et al.  Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases : report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation , 2003 .

[26]  Linda C Tapsell,et al.  Overview of computerized dietary assessment programs for research and practice in nutrition education. , 2005, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[27]  R. G. Carrascosa,et al.  Paper and pencil vs online self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) applied to university population: a pilot study , 2011 .

[28]  T. Wong,et al.  Usability Test of an Interactive Dietary Recording , 2009 .

[29]  Mathilde Touvier,et al.  Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study , 2011, International Journal of Public Health.

[30]  Rachel K. Johnson,et al.  Personal Digital Assistants are Comparable to Traditional Diaries for Dietary Self-Monitoring During a Weight Loss Program , 2007, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[31]  R. Hanning,et al.  Dietary assessment and self-monitoring with nutrition applications for mobile devices. , 2012, Canadian journal of dietetic practice and research : a publication of Dietitians of Canada = Revue canadienne de la pratique et de la recherche en dietetique : une publication des Dietetistes du Canada.