Improved disinfection byproduct removal using a polysulfone membrane loaded with powdered activated carbon

Powdered activated carbon was immobilized by casting it in a polysulfone polymer membrane, which was then tested for disinfection byproduct (chloroform) and bacteria (Escherichia coli) removal. The membrane prepared using 90% T20 carbon and 10% polysulfone (M20‐90) provided a filtration capacity of 2783 L m−2, adsorption capacity of 2.85 mg g−1, and 95% chloroform removal in a 10 s empty bed contact time. Flaws and cracks on the membrane surface caused by the carbon particles appeared to reduce chloroform and E. coli removal. To overcome this challenge, up to six layers of the M20‐90 membrane were overlapped, which improved chloroform filtration capacity by 94.6%, to 5416 L m−2, and increased the adsorption capacity by 93.3%, to 5.51 mg g−1. E. coli removal also increased from 2.5 logs reduction using a single membrane layer to 6.3 logs using six layers under 10 psi feed pressure. The filtration flux declined from 6.94 m3 m−2 day−1 psi−1 for a single layer (0.45 mm thick) to 1.26 m3 m−2 day−1 psi−1 for the six‐layer membrane system (2.7 mm thick). This work demonstrated the feasibility of using powdered activated carbon immobilized on a membrane to improve chloroform adsorption and filtration capacity while simultaneously removing microbes.

[1]  Sher Jamal Khan,et al.  Water Treatment Using High Performance Antifouling Ultrafiltration Polyether Sulfone Membranes Incorporated with Activated Carbon , 2022, Polymers.

[2]  M. Bashir,et al.  A New Polyvinylidene Fluoride Membrane Synthesized by Integrating of Powdered Activated Carbon for Treatment of Stabilized Leachate , 2021, Water.

[3]  W. Chu,et al.  Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes. , 2020, Chemosphere.

[4]  K. Goswami,et al.  Credibility of polymeric and ceramic membrane filtration in the removal of bacteria and virus from water: A review. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Tao Wu,et al.  Closing the active carbon cycle: Regeneration of spent activated carbon from a wastewater treatment facility for resource optimization , 2020 .

[6]  J. Ran,et al.  Adsorption materials for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the key factors for VOCs adsorption process: A review , 2020 .

[7]  J. Cotruvo,et al.  National Trends of Bladder Cancer and Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water: A Review and Multicountry Ecological Study , 2019, Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society.

[8]  Qifeng Zhang,et al.  Novel insights into the interplay between support and active layer in the thin film composite polyamide membranes , 2017 .

[9]  Martin J. Sweetman,et al.  Activated Carbon, Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene: Materials and Composites for Advanced Water Purification , 2017 .

[10]  D. Werner,et al.  Trihalomethanes formation in point of use surface water disinfection with chlorine or chlorine dioxide tablets , 2016 .

[11]  K. Cen,et al.  Pressure drop in a packed bed with sintered ore particles as applied to sinter coolers with a novel vertically arranged design for waste heat recovery , 2016 .

[12]  G. Yuan,et al.  Removal of VOCs by activated carbon microspheres derived from polymer: a comparative study , 2015, Adsorption.

[13]  G. Ayoko,et al.  Structural characterisation and environmental application of organoclays for the removal of phenolic compounds. , 2013, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[14]  M. Çakmakci,et al.  Removal of trihalomethanes from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  M. C. Antunes,et al.  Factorial analysis of the trihalomethanes formation in water disinfection using chlorine. , 2007, Analytica chimica acta.

[16]  D. Reckhow,et al.  Characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors based on hydrophobicity and molecular size. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Krishna Gopal,et al.  Chlorination byproducts, their toxicodynamics and removal from drinking water. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  S. Richardson,et al.  Occurrence of a new generation of disinfection byproducts. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Christopher Bellona,et al.  Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review. , 2004, Water research.

[20]  B. Keskinler,et al.  Removal of surfactants by powdered activated carbon and microfiltration. , 2004, Water research.

[21]  J. Maruyama,et al.  Preparation of carbonaceous adsorbents for removal of chloroform from drinking water , 2001 .

[22]  G A Boorman,et al.  Drinking water disinfection byproducts: review and approach to toxicity evaluation. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  P. Singer Control of Disinfection By‐Products in Drinking Water , 1994 .

[24]  Vernon L. Snoeyink,et al.  Predicting and Verifying Organics Removal by PAC in an , 1991 .

[25]  W. Slooff,et al.  Treatment of municipal waste water by reverse osmosis and activated-carbon-removal of organic micropollutants and reduction of toxicity , 1983 .

[26]  I. F. Macdonald,et al.  Flow through Porous Media-the Ergun Equation Revisited , 1979 .

[27]  K. Naddafi,et al.  Efficiency of domestic reverse osmosis ( RO ) in removal of trihalomethanes ( THMs ) from drinking water , 2009 .

[28]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Preparation of Mesoporous High-Surface-Area Activated Carbon , 2000 .

[29]  Jeffrey Q. Adams,et al.  Using Powdered Activated Carbon: A Critical Review , 1991 .

[30]  H. Tamon,et al.  Solvent regeneration of spent activated carbon in wastewater treatment. , 1990 .

[31]  John C. Crittenden,et al.  Design Considerations for GAC Treatment of Organic Chemicals , 1987 .

[32]  T. M. Keinath,et al.  Powdered activated carbon treatment process mechanisms , 1984 .