On Site Investigation and Health Monitoring of a Historic Tower in Mantua, Italy

The paper describes the strategy adopted to assess the structural condition of the tallest historic tower in Mantua (Italy) after the Italian seismic sequence of May–June 2012 and exemplifies the application of health monitoring using (automated) operational modal analysis. The post-earthquake survey (including extensive visual inspection, historic and documentary research, non-destructive (ND) material testing, and ambient vibration tests) highlighted the poor state of preservation of the upper part of the tower; subsequently, a dynamic monitoring system (consisting of a few accelerometers and one temperature sensor) was installed in the building to address the preservation of the historic structure, and automated modal identification was continuously performed. Despite the low levels of vibration that existed in operational conditions, the analysis of data collected over a period of about 15 months allowed to assess and model the effects of changing temperature on modal frequencies and to detect the occurrence of abnormal behavior and damage under the changing environment. The monitoring results demonstrate the potential key role of vibration-based structural health monitoring, implemented through low-cost hardware solutions and appropriate software tools, in the preventive conservation and the condition-based maintenance of historic towers.

[1]  Rodolfo Puglia,et al.  Overview on the Strong‐Motion Data Recorded during the May–June 2012 Emilia Seismic Sequence , 2013 .

[2]  Claudio Modena,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in structural health monitoring: Applications on cultural heritage buildings , 2016 .

[3]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies , 2007 .

[4]  Antonella Saisi,et al.  Post-earthquake diagnostic investigation of a historic masonry tower , 2015 .

[5]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Long-term monitoring and data analysis of the Tamar Bridge , 2013 .

[6]  Gabriele Comanducci,et al.  Sensing hardware optimization and automated condition assessment of a monumental masonry bell-tower , 2015 .

[7]  Alessandro Cabboi,et al.  Automated modal identification and tracking: Application to an iron arch bridge , 2017 .

[8]  Reto Cantieni.  One-Year Monitoring of a Historic Bell Tower , 2014 .

[9]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[10]  Bart Peeters,et al.  System identification and damage detection in civil engineering , 2000 .

[11]  Gabriele Comanducci,et al.  Structural health monitoring of suspension bridges with features affected by changing wind speed , 2015 .

[12]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Fully automated (operational) modal analysis , 2012 .

[13]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[14]  Carmelo Gentile,et al.  Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua, Italy , 2015 .

[15]  Alessandro Cabboi.  Automatic operational modal analysis: challenges and applications to historic structures and infrastructures , 2014 .

[16]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  Antonio Tralli,et al.  Damage assessment of fortresses after the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy) , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[18]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: From automated OMA to damage detection , 2012 .

[19]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis: Text and Readings , 1979 .

[20]  R. Cantieni,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL METHODS USED IN SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES , 2004 .

[21]  Luigi Sorrentino,et al.  The performance of churches in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.