Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity

▪ Abstract The focus of most ideas on diversity maintenance is species coexistence, which may be stable or unstable. Stable coexistence can be quantified by the long-term rates at which community members recover from low density. Quantification shows that coexistence mechanisms function in two major ways: They may be (a) equalizing because they tend to minimize average fitness differences between species, or (b) stabilizing because they tend to increase negative intraspecific interactions relative to negative interspecific interactions. Stabilizing mechanisms are essential for species coexistence and include traditional mechanisms such as resource partitioning and frequency-dependent predation, as well as mechanisms that depend on fluctuations in population densities and environmental factors in space and time. Equalizing mechanisms contribute to stable coexistence because they reduce large average fitness inequalities which might negate the effects of stabilizing mechanisms. Models of unstable coexitence...

[1]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[2]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[3]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[4]  R. Macarthur.  Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. , 1970, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  S. Levin.  Dispersion and Population Interactions , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. A. León,et al.  Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  R. McGehee,et al.  Coexistence of species competing for shared resources. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  T. Schoener,et al.  Effects of density-restricted food encounter on some single-level competition models. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  J. Connell.  Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[10]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Predator-Mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[11]  M. Huston.  A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Richard Levins,et al.  Coexistence in a Variable Environment , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Tree Dispersion, Abundance, and Diversity in a Tropical Dry Forest , 1979, Science.

[14]  A. Hastings.  Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[15]  J H Gillespie,et al.  Conditions for the existence of stationary densities for some two-dimensional diffusion processes with applications in population biology. , 1980, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  Michael Turelli,et al.  Niche Overlap and Invasion of Competitors in Random Environments II. The Effects of Demographic Stochasticity , 1980 .

[17]  P. Abrams.  Are Competition Coefficients Constant? Inductive Versus Deductive Approaches , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Hal L. Smith.  Competitive Coexistence in an Oscillating Chemostat , 1981 .

[19]  Michael Turelli,et al.  Niche overlap and invasion of competitors in random environments I. Models without demographic stochasticity , 1981 .

[20]  Introduction: why are there so many kinds of tropical trees? , 1982 .

[21]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[22]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  The role of rapid dispersal in the population dynamics of competition , 1982 .

[23]  T. Schoener.  The Controversy over Interspecific Competition , 1982 .

[24]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The theory of limiting similarity , 1983 .

[25]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Asymptotic behavior of some stochastic difference equation population models , 1984 .

[28]  P. Abrams.  Variability in resource consumption rates and the coexistence of competing species , 1984 .

[29]  R. Holt.  Density-independent mortality, non-linear competitive interactions, and species coexistence , 1985 .

[30]  S. Ellner,et al.  ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. II. Reciprocal Yield-Law models. , 1985, Theoretical population biology.

[31]  I. Noble,et al.  Dispersal, Variability, and Transient Niches: Species Coexistence in a Uniformly Variable Environment , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[32]  V. Hutson,et al.  Permanent coexistence in general models of three interacting species , 1985, Journal of mathematical biology.

[33]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Coexistence of plant species with similar niches , 1984, Vegetatio.

[34]  Frederic A. Hopf,et al.  The role of the Allee effect in species packing , 1985 .

[35]  S. Ellner,et al.  ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. I. Logistic-type models. , 1985, Theoretical population biology.

[36]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Coexistence of Competitors in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments: A Look at the Combined Effects of Different Sorts of Variability , 1985 .

[37]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Interspecific competition among metapopulations with space-limited subpopulations , 1986 .

[38]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Habitat selection in slowly regenerating environments , 1986 .

[39]  P. D. Boer.  The competitive exclusion principle: Other views and a reply. , 1986 .

[40]  Alternate plant life history strategies and coexistence in randomly varying environments , 1987 .

[41]  Robert P. Gendron,et al.  Models and Mechanisms of Frequency-Dependent Predation , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[42]  A. Ives.  Covariance, coexistence and the population dynamics of two competitors using a patchy resource , 1988 .

[43]  D. Tilman.  Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. (MPB-26), Volume 26 , 1988 .

[44]  J. Grover.  Dynamics of Competition in a Variable Environment: Experiments with Two Diatom Species , 1988 .

[45]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Environmental Heterogeneity and the Coexistence of Desert Rodents , 1988 .

[46]  Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. David Tilman. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1988. xii, 360 pp., illus. $45; paper, $15.95. Monographs in Population Biology, vol. 26. , 1988, Science.

[47]  R. Armstrong.  Competition, seed predation, and species coexistence , 1989 .

[48]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonic competition models , 1989 .

[49]  S. Ellner,et al.  Convergence to stationary distributions in two-species stochastic competition models , 1989, Journal of mathematical biology.

[50]  James R. Runkle,et al.  Synchrony of Regeneration, Gaps, and Latitudinal Differences in Tree Species Diversity , 1989 .

[51]  P. Chesson,et al.  Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Desert rodent community structure : a test of four mechanisms of coexistence , 1989 .

[53]  Joel s. Brown.  Coexistence on a Seasonal Resource , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[54]  Peter Chesson,et al.  MacArthur's consumer-resource model , 1990 .

[55]  D. Tilman.  Constraints and tradeoffs: toward a predictive theory of competition and succession , 1990 .

[56]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Ecology of sessile animals on sublittoral hard substrata: The need to measure variation , 1990 .

[57]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Geometry, heterogeneity and competition in variable environments , 1990 .

[58]  J. Grover.  Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to Monod's Model , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[59]  F. Adler.  Coexistence of two types on a single resource in discrete time , 1990 .

[60]  T. F. H. Allen,et al.  The confusion between scale‐defined levels and conventional levels of organization in ecology , 1990 .

[61]  James B. Grace,et al.  Components of resource competition in plant communities. , 1990 .

[62]  P. Chesson,et al.  A need for niches? , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  H. Caswell,et al.  Disturbance, interspecific interaction and diversity in metapopulations , 1991 .

[64]  D. Simberloff.  The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1991 .

[65]  James P. Grover,et al.  Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to the Variable-Internal-Stores Model , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[66]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Communities in Patchy Environments: A Model of Disturbance, Competition, and Heterogeneity , 1991 .

[67]  Nancy Huntly,et al.  Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems , 1991 .

[68]  S. Levin.  THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[69]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Time scale of resource dynamics and coexistence through time partitioning , 1992 .

[70]  W. Ebenhoh.  Temporal organization in a multi-species model , 1992 .

[71]  M. Zobel.  Plant species coexistence - the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors , 1992 .

[72]  S. Pacala,et al.  Herbivores and Plant Diversity , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[73]  S. Roxburgh,et al.  Application of community matrix theory to plant competition data , 1992 .

[74]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[75]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Coexistence of Competing Parasitoid Species on a Host with a Variable Life Cycle , 1993 .

[76]  David Tilman,et al.  The maintenance of species richness in plant communities , 1993 .

[77]  P. Chesson,et al.  Temporal hierarchies of variation and the maintenance of diversity , 1993 .

[78]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Size-structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest-the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species , 1993 .

[79]  T. Namba,et al.  Competitive Coexistence in a Seasonally Fluctuating Environment II. Multiple Stable States and Invasion Success , 1993 .

[80]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Modelling Biodiversity: Latitudinal Gradient of Forest Species Diversity , 1994 .

[81]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[82]  P. Chesson,et al.  The forest architecture hypothesis for diversity maintenance. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[83]  P. Chesson.  Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments , 1994 .

[84]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Growth and competition in a light gradient , 1994 .

[85]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Importance of Being Discrete (and Spatial) , 1994 .

[86]  T. Fagerström,et al.  Competition and coexistence in plant communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[87]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[88]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[89]  John H. Lawton,et al.  The Ecological Consequences of Shared Natural Enemies , 1994 .

[90]  David Tilman,et al.  Limiting Similarity in Mechanistic and Spatial Models of Plant Competition in Heterogeneous Environments , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[91]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[92]  C. E. Pake,et al.  Is Coexistence of Sonoran Desert Annuals Mediated by Temporal Variability Reproductive Success , 1995 .

[93]  C. Pfister.  Estimating Competition Coefficients from Census Data: A Test with Field Manipulations of Tidepool Fishes , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[94]  N. Hairston,et al.  Age and survivorship of diapausing eggs in a sediment egg bank , 1995 .

[95]  M. A. Leibold.  The Niche Concept Revisited: Mechanistic Models and Community Context , 1995 .

[96]  G. Perry,et al.  Anolis lizards of the Caribbean : ecology, evolution, and plate tectonics , 1997 .

[97]  Peter Chesson,et al.  How species with different regeneration niches coexist in patchy habitats with local disturbances , 1995 .

[98]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[99]  C. E. Pake,et al.  Seed Banks in Desert Annuals: Implications for Persistence and Coexistence in Variable Environments , 1996 .

[100]  P. Abrams.  Limits to the Similarity of Competitors Under Hierarchical Lottery Competition , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[101]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Phenological Pattern of Tree Regeneration in a Model for Forest Species Diversity , 1996 .

[102]  T. Vincent,et al.  Trade-Offs and Coexistence in Consumer-Resource Models: It all Depends on what and where you Eat , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[103]  S. Ellner,et al.  Phenotypic variation in a zooplankton egg bank , 1996 .

[104]  J. Grover.  Resource Competition , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[105]  S. Heard,et al.  Clutch‐Size Behavior and Coexistence in Ephemeralpatch Competition Models , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[106]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[107]  A. Ives,et al.  Aggregation and the coexistence of competing parasitoid species. , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[108]  C. Cáceres,et al.  Temporal variation, dormancy, and coexistence: a field test of the storage effect. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[109]  Kui Lin,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF COMPETITIVE ASYMMETRY ON THE RATE OF COMPETITIVE DISPLACEMENT : HOW ROBUST IS HUBBELL'S COMMUNITY DRIFT MODEL? , 1997 .

[110]  S. Hubbell,et al.  A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forests and coral reefs , 1997, Coral Reefs.

[111]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Strong density- and diversity-related effects help to maintain tree species diversity in a neotropical forest. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[112]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[113]  Ariel Novoplansky,et al.  On the relative importance of competition in unproductive environments , 1997 .

[114]  P. Chesson,et al.  The Roles of Harsh and Fluctuating Conditions in the Dynamics of Ecological Communities , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[115]  J. Vandermeer,et al.  Indirect effects with a keystone predator: coexistence and chaos. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[116]  H. Cornell,et al.  11. Local and Regional Processes as Controls of Species Richness , 1998 .

[117]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  THEORETICAL CONCEPTS AND EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO MEASURING INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1998 .

[118]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Effects of Disturbance on Species Diversity: A Multitrophic Perspective , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[119]  R. Holt,et al.  APPARENT COMPETITION OR APPARENT MUTUALISM? SHARED PREDATION WHEN POPULATIONS CYCLE , 1998 .

[120]  Neuhauser.  Habitat Destruction and Competitive Coexistence in Spatially Explicit Models with Local Interactions. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[121]  R. Holt,et al.  Disentangling Resource and Apparent Competition: Realistic Models for Plant-herbivore Communities , 1998 .

[122]  High Competition with Low Similarity and Low Competition with High Similarity: Exploitative and Apparent Competition in Consumer‐Resource Systems , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[123]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[124]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[125]  B. Bolker,et al.  Spatial Moment Equations for Plant Competition: Understanding Spatial Strategies and the Advantages of Short Dispersal , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[126]  E. Leigh,et al.  Tropical Forest Ecology@@@Tropical Forest Ecology: A View from Barro Colorado Island , 2000 .

[127]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  THEORY OF MARINE COMMUNITIES: COMPETITION, PREDATION, AND RECRUITMENT-DEPENDENT INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1999 .

[128]  J V Greenman,et al.  Host exclusion and coexistence in apparent and direct competition: An application of bifurcation theory. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[129]  A. Hastings,et al.  Learning, Host Fidelity, and the Stability of Host‐Parasitoid Communities , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[130]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species Diversity , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[131]  E. Berlow,et al.  QUANTIFYING VARIATION IN THE STRENGTHS OF SPECIES INTERACTIONS , 1999 .

[132]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  IS PREDATOR‐MEDIATED COEXISTENCE POSSIBLE INUNSTABLE SYSTEMS? , 1999 .

[133]  S Pacala,et al.  Limiting Similarity, Species Packing, and System Stability for Hierarchical Competition‐Colonization Models , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[134]  J. Dushoff,et al.  Local frequency dependence and global coexistence. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[135]  J. Rusek,et al.  Impacts of airborne pollutants on soil fauna , 2000 .

[136]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Species coexistence by permanent spatial heterogeneity in a lottery model. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[137]  Bruce J. MacFadden,et al.  Cenozoic Mammalian Herbivores From the Americas: Reconstructing Ancient Diets and Terrestrial Communities , 2000 .

[138]  P. Chesson.  General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[139]  John F. Mull,et al.  Harvester Ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): Their Community and Ecosystem Influences , 2000 .