A New Concept for Quality Control of Clinical Laboratory Investigations in the Light of Clinical Requirements and Based on Reference Method Values

Quality control is an essential element in clinical laboratory investigations. In the basic programs for quality control used in recent years accuracy control has been carried out through a comparison with method-dependent assigned values. With this system the "accuracy" of results from different laboratories is relative, and comparability is assured only when the laboratories use the same analytical method. Considering the steadily increasing variety of methods and equipment, a meaningful exchange of information in patient care, teaching and research is becoming more and more difficult; but clinical requirements make such an exchange essential. In this paper a new concept for quality control is presented for discussion. In the basic program incorporating the new concept the method-dependent assigned values are replaced by reference method values, which are method-independent. In addition to accuracy control, an ongoing monitoring procedure using a Shewhart control chart is also carried out. The maximum allowable day-to-day imprecision and the maximum allowable deviation from the reference method value are fixed on the basis of clinical requirements. This means that the ratio of biological variation to analytical between-day imprecision should be greater than or equal to 2. If the biological variation is unknown, then the reference interval is used in its place; the quotient, reference interval/analytical between-day imprecision, should then be greater than or equal to 8. The decision limits for the interlaboratory surveys should be fixed in an analogous manner independent of the analytical method. After the introduction of quality control based on the new concept the results from different laboratories would be comparable to the extent dictated by clinical requirements. The main principles underlying the new concept and the effects of using the new approach are presented for discussion, and the reader is invited to submit comments in writing.

[1]  R. Grasbeck,et al.  Reference Values in Laboratory Medicine , 1981 .

[2]  P. Broughton,et al.  International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Scientific Committee Expert Panel on Nomenclature and Principles of Quality Control in Clinical Chemistry. Approved recommendation (1979) on quality control in clinical chemistry. Part 3. Calibration and control materials. , 1980, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[3]  Guder Wg.  [Degree of influence of perturbing factors in clinical-chemical examinations]. , 1980 .

[4]  P. Broughton,et al.  International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Committee on Standards. Expert Panel on Nomenclature and Principles of Quality Control in Clinical Chemistry. Approved recommendation (1978) on quality control in clinical chemistry. Part 1. General principles and terminology. , 1979 .

[5]  G. Siest,et al.  Provisional recommendation on the theory of reference values (1978). Part 1. The concept of reference values. , 1979, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  E. K. Harris,et al.  Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. II. Estimating biological components of variation. , 1971, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  A. Gowenlock.  The Influence of Accuracy and Precision on the Normal Range , 1969 .

[8]  D. Stamm,et al.  Determination of Assigned Values in Control Specimens for Internal Accuracy Control and for Interlaboratory Surveys Evaluationof 200 Different Lots with Identical Experimental Design: Experiences and Conclusions , 1980, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[9]  D. Stamm.  Reference Materials and Reference Methods in Clinical Chemistry , 1979, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[10]  S. B. Atienza-Samols,et al.  With Contributions by , 1978 .

[11]  T. Whitehead,et al.  Quality control in clinical chemistry , 1977 .

[12]  D. Stamm.  Calibration and quality control materials. , 1974, Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[13]  E. K. Harris,et al.  Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. 3. Physiological and medical implications. , 1970, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  H. Kaiser,et al.  Zum Problem der Nachweisgrenze , 1965 .