Perception of Egocentric Distance during Gravitational Changes in Parabolic Flight

We explored the effect of gravity on the perceived representation of the absolute distance of objects to the observers within the range from 1.5–6 m. Experiments were performed on board the CNES Airbus Zero-G during parabolic flights eliciting repeated exposures to short periods of microgravity (0 g), hypergravity (1.8 g), and normal gravity (1 g). Two methods for obtaining estimates of perceived egocentric distance were used: verbal reports and visually directed motion toward a memorized visual target. For the latter method, because normal walking is not possible in 0 g, blindfolded subjects translated toward the visual target by pulling on a rope with their arms. The results showed that distance estimates using both verbal reports and blind pulling were significantly different between normal gravity, microgravity, and hypergravity. Compared to the 1 g measurements, the estimates of perceived distance using blind pulling were shorter for all distances in 1.8 g, whereas in 0 g they were longer for distances up to 4 m and shorter for distances beyond. These findings suggest that gravity plays a role in both the sensorimotor system and the perceptual/cognitive system for estimating egocentric distance.

[1]  Gilles Clément,et al.  Changes in the vertical size of a three-dimensional object drawn in weightlessness by astronauts , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Embodiment, ego-space, and action , 2008 .

[3]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D. C. Higgins Human Spatial Orientation , 1967, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[5]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Big People, Little World: The Body Influences Size Perception , 2009, Perception.

[7]  O. Tošković Brave upside down world: Does looking between the legs elongate or shorten the perceived distance , 2010 .

[8]  C E Lathan,et al.  Effects of gravitoinertial force variations on vertical gaze direction during oculomotor reflexes and visual fixation. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[9]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Visual Perception of Location and Distance , 1996 .

[10]  Gilles Clément,et al.  Long-Duration Spaceflight Increases Depth Ambiguity of Reversible Perspective Figures , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  J. Thomson Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  A. Higashiyama,et al.  Perceived size and perceived distance of targets viewed from between the legs: Evidence for proprioceptive theory , 2006, Vision Research.

[13]  Laurence R. Young,et al.  SLOPE, DISTANCE, AND HEIGHT ESTIMATION OF LUNAR AND LUNAR-LIKE TERRAIN IN A VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT , 2011 .

[14]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Distance estimation in vista space , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions , 1997 .

[16]  J. Thomson How do we use visual information to control locomotion? , 1980, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  L. Harris,et al.  The relative contributions of radial and laminar optic flow to the perception of linear self-motion. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[18]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[19]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  How Haptic Size Sensations Improve Distance Perception , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  O. Sabouraud [Space perception]. , 1978, Revue d'oto-neuro-ophtalmologie.

[21]  Gilles Clément,et al.  Distance and Size Perception in Astronauts during Long-Duration Spaceflight , 2013, Life.

[22]  Andrew Rutherford Handbook of perception and human performance. Vol 1: Sensory processes and perception. Vol 2: Cognitive processes and performance. , 1987 .

[23]  V. Walsh,et al.  Vestibular Activation Differentially Modulates Human Early Visual Cortex and V5/MT Excitability and Response Entropy , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[24]  A. Higashiyama Horizontal and vertical distance perception: The discorded-orientation theory , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Gilles Clément,et al.  Geometric illusions in astronauts during long-duration spaceflight , 2012, Neuroreport.

[26]  Laurence R Harris,et al.  Perceived distance depends on the orientation of both the body and the visual environment. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[27]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  Being Barbie: The Size of One’s Own Body Determines the Perceived Size of the World , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Daniel A. Gajewski,et al.  Gaze behavior and the perception of egocentric distance. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[29]  Eric Villard,et al.  Geometric visual illusions in microgravity during parabolic flight , 2005, Neuroreport.

[30]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Measuring Spatial Perception with Spatial Updating and Action , 2008 .

[31]  J. Andre,et al.  Using verbal and blind-walking distance estimates to investigate the two visual systems hypothesis , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  M. Reschke,et al.  Neuroscience in space , 2008 .

[33]  Gilles Clément,et al.  Influence of the gravitational vertical on geometric visual illusions. , 2005, Acta astronautica.

[34]  Effects of Varying Gravity Levels in Parabolic Flight on the Size-Mass Illusion , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Travel distance estimation from visual motion by leaky path integration , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  The linear perspective information in ground surface representation and distance judgment , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Perception of affordances during long-term exposure to weightlessness in the International Space station , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[38]  Paul DiZio,et al.  Motor function in microgravity: movement in weightlessness , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.