Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials

The axial transmission technique uses a linear arrangement of ultrasonic emitters and receivers placed on a same side of a cortical bone site in contact with the skin, involving ultrasonic propagation along the axis of bone. The velocity of the waves radiated from bone has been shown to reflect bone status. The thickness and composition of soft tissue may vary along the length of the bone, between different skeletal sites, or between subjects. Hence, accurate estimates of velocity require first to eliminate the effect of the overlying soft tissue that is traversed by the ultrasound wave. To correct for such bias without measuring soft tissue properties, we designed new ultrasonic probes in the 1-2 MHz frequency range. It is based on propagation along the bone surface in two opposite directions from two sources placed on both sides of a unique group of receivers. The aim is to obtain an unbiased estimate of the velocity without any intermediate calculation of soft tissue properties, such as thickness variation or velocity. Validation tests were performed on academic material such as Perspex or aluminium. We found that head wave velocity values could be biased by more than 10% for inclination of a few degrees between the test specimen surface and the probe. On test materials, the compensation procedure implemented in our probe led to a relative precision error on velocity measurement lower than 0.2 to 0.3%. These results suggest that the correction procedure allows measuring in vivo velocities independently of soft tissue properties.

[1]  M. Popovtzer,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status. , 1995, Bone.

[2]  E. Bossy,et al.  Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Alexandre A. Radzig,et al.  Handbook of Physical Quantities , 1997 .

[4]  G Berger,et al.  Analysis of the axial transmission technique for the assessment of skeletal status. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R. Heaney,et al.  Cortical ultrasound velocity as an indicator of bone status , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  J. M. Thijssen,et al.  Influence of absorbing and scattering media on the propagation of ultrasound , 1989 .

[7]  H K Genant,et al.  A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. , 2000, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[8]  C. Njeh,et al.  Does Combining the Results from Multiple Bone Sites Measured by a New Quantitative Ultrasound Device Improve Discrimination of Hip Fracture? , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  H K Genant,et al.  An in vitro investigation of the dependence on sample thickness of the speed of sound along the specimen. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  D. Folds Experimental Determination of Ultrasonic Wave Velocities in Plastics, Elastomers, and Syntactic Foam as a Function of Temperature , 1972 .

[11]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M. Weiss,et al.  Discrimination of Proximal Hip Fracture by Quantitative Ultrasound Measurement at the Radius , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  Tommi Kärkkäinen,et al.  Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[14]  D. Hans,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Tibia Depends on Both Cortical Density and Thickness , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  I. Siegel,et al.  The determination of fracture healing by measurement of sound velocity across the fracture site. , 1958, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.